{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,12]],"date-time":"2026-04-12T06:23:16Z","timestamp":1775974996362,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":10,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"6","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Gut"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1991,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>A prospective study of abdominal ultrasound was undertaken in 100 consecutive infants who presented with a history of persistent vomiting aged 5 to 90 days. Each infant had a 'test feed' followed by an ultrasonographic scan of the pylorus at the cotside. On test feeding a palpable tumour was evident in 38 infants. On real time ultrasound using the criteria for diagnosing pyloric stenosis, these 38 infants as well as six others were documented as having pyloric stenosis. In the other 56 patients the vomiting settled in six and a barium examination was performed on the remaining 50. This confirmed gastro-oesophageal reflux in 46, two of whom had an associated hiatus hernia, one with a duodenal malrotation, and three were reported as normal. Ultrasound of the abdomen is an accurate, reliable, and rapid screening method to differentiate the causes of severe vomiting in infancy.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1136\/gut.32.6.612","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,9,18]],"date-time":"2007-09-18T17:41:31Z","timestamp":1190137291000},"page":"612-614","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Value of ultrasound in differentiating causes of persistent vomiting in infants."],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"32","author":[{"given":"M D","family":"Rollins","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M D","family":"Shields","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"R J","family":"Quinn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M A","family":"Wooldridge","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1991,6,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1149","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM197705192962006","article-title":"Ultrasound in the diagnosis of idiopathic hypertrophic pyloric stenosis","volume":"2","author":"Teele, R.L.; Smith, E.H.","year":"1977","unstructured":"Teele RL, Smith EH. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of idiopathic hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. N Engl J Med 1977; 2%: 1149-50.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1136\/adc.64.1.138","article-title":"Pyloric stenosis: congenital or acquired?","volume":"64","author":"Rollins, M.D.; Shields, M.D.; Quinn, R.J.M.; Wooldridge, M.A.W.","year":"1989","unstructured":"Rollins MD, Shields MD, Quinn RJM, Wooldridge MAW. Pyloric stenosis: congenital or acquired? Arch Dis Child 1989; 64: 138-9.","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child"},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.1870090607","article-title":"Ultrasound in the diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis","volume":"9","author":"Blumhagen, J.D.; Coombs, J.B.","year":"1981","unstructured":"Blumhagen JD, Coombs JB. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Clin Ultrasound 1981; 9: 289-92.","journal-title":"J Clin Ultrasound"},{"key":"ref_4","first-page":"1057","article-title":"Sonography ofhypertrophic pyloric stenosis","volume":"136","author":"Strauss, S.; Itzchak, Y.; Manor, A.; Heyman, Z.; Graif, M.","year":"1981","unstructured":"Strauss S, Itzchak Y, Manor A, Heyman Z, Graif M. Sonography ofhypertrophic pyloric stenosis. AmJ Radiology 1981; 136:1057-8.","journal-title":"AmJ Radiology"},{"key":"ref_5","first-page":"118","article-title":"Increasing incidence of infantile of infants who were both test feed positive and ultrasound positive (Table II). The difference between the mean (SD) anteroposterior diameter in the test feed negative but ultrasound positive group","volume-title":"mm) was slight. But hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, 1971-1983","volume":"79","author":"Grant, G.A.; McAleer, J.J.A.","year":"1986","unstructured":"Grant GA, McAleer JJA. Increasing incidence of infantile of infants who were both test feed positive and ultrasound positive (Table II). The difference between the mean (SD) anteroposterior diameter in the test feed negative but ultrasound positive group (13Q8 (0A7) mm) compared to that in the normal infants (11*3 (1@7) mm) was slight. But hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, 1971-1983. Ir Med 7 1986; 79:118-9."},{"key":"ref_6","first-page":"200","article-title":"The improved ultrasound diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis","volume":"16","author":"Stunden, R.J.; Le Quesne, G.W.; Little, K.E.T.","year":"1986","unstructured":"Stunden RJ, Le Quesne GW, Little KET. The improved ultrasound diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. PaediatrRadiol 1986; 16: 200-5.","journal-title":"PaediatrRadiol"},{"key":"ref_7","first-page":"625","article-title":"Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis - diagnosis from the pyloric muscle index","volume":"38","author":"Carver, R.A.; Okorie, M.; Steiner, G.M.; Dickson, A.S.","year":"1988","unstructured":"Carver RA, Okorie M, Steiner GM, Dickson AS. Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis - diagnosis from the pyloric muscle index. Clin Radiol 1988; 38: 625-7.","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"key":"ref_8","first-page":"366","article-title":"Ultrasound diagnosis of gastrothe difference in mean muscle thickness in this group (4 4 (0 4) mm v 2-2 (0 5) mm) was highly significant (p<O0-01). This again confirms that the anteroposterior diameter is a questionable oesophageal reflux","volume":"59","author":"Naik, D.R.; Moore, D.J.","year":"1984","unstructured":"Naik DR, Moore DJ. Ultrasound diagnosis of gastrothe difference in mean muscle thickness in this group (4 4 (0 4) mm v 2-2 (0 5) mm) was highly significant (p<O0-01). This again confirms that the anteroposterior diameter is a questionable oesophageal reflux. Arch Dis Child 1984; 59: 366-7.","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1943","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.290.6486.1943","article-title":"Comparison of barium swallow and ultrasound in diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux in children","volume":"290","author":"Naik, D.R.; Bolia, A.; Moore, D.J.","year":"1985","unstructured":"Naik DR, Bolia A, Moore DJ. Comparison of barium swallow and ultrasound in diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux in children. BMJ 1985; 290: 1943-5.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"911","DOI":"10.1136\/adc.59.10.911","article-title":"Clinical significance of gastro-oesophageal reflux","volume":"59","author":"Carre, I.J.","year":"1984","unstructured":"Carre IJ. Clinical significance of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Arch Dis Child 1984; 59: 911-2.","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child"}],"container-title":["Gut"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/gut.32.6.612","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,7]],"date-time":"2025-12-07T02:25:51Z","timestamp":1765074351000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/gut.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/gut.32.6.612"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1991,6]]},"references-count":10,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1991,6,1]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1991,6]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/gut.32.6.612"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/gut.32.6.612","relation":{},"ISSN":["0017-5749","1468-3288"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0017-5749","type":"print"},{"value":"1468-3288","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1991,6]]}}}