{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,16]],"date-time":"2026-10-16T01:05:56Z","timestamp":1792112756867,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":8,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"11","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Gut"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1992,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The value of serum liver function tests and abdominal ultrasound as screening tests of the need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was determined in patients with unexplained abdominal pain without associated jaundice. In 1989 and 1990 1005 ERCPs were undertaken, of which 138 (14%) were for this indication. The duct or ducts of interest were delineated by ERCP in 95% of patients. The lesions found were bile duct stones in 10 patients, chronic pancreatitis in five, pancreatic carcinoma in one, peptic ulcer or duodenitis in four. A satisfactory ultrasound examination had been performed in 94% of patients. For chronic pancreatitis, its sensitivity was 60% and specificity 95%. For choledocholithiasis, the ultrasonic detection of duct dilatation or stones had a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 86%. Of the liver function tests, the alkaline phosphatase was more sensitive (67%) than the transaminases (44%) in indicating the presence of bile duct stones and had a high specificity (95%). None of the 10 patients with duct stones had normal ultrasound and normal alkaline phosphatase. Thus it was found that demonstration of a normal common bile duct by abdominal ultrasound and normal serum alkaline phosphatase together have 100% specificity in excluding bile duct stones. Using such knowledge over the two year period of this study would have spared 36 patients the need for ERCP.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1136\/gut.33.11.1559","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,9,18]],"date-time":"2007-09-18T17:41:31Z","timestamp":1190137291000},"page":"1559-1561","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":21,"title":["Value of ultrasound and liver function tests in determining the need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in unexplained abdominal pain."],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"33","author":[{"given":"J R","family":"Thornton","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A J","family":"Lobo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"D J","family":"Lintott","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A T","family":"Axon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1992,11,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","first-page":"764","article-title":"Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for unexplained abdominal pain","volume":"280","author":"Bull, J.; Keeling, P.W.N.; Thompson, R.P.H.","year":"1980","unstructured":"Bull J, Keeling PWN, Thompson RPH. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for unexplained abdominal pain. BM3r 1980; 280: 764."},{"key":"ref_2","first-page":"13","article-title":"Prospective comparison of three noninvasive tests for pancreatic disease","volume":"289","author":"Foster, P.N.; Mitchell, C.J.; Robertson, D.R.C.; Hamilton, I.; Irving, H.; Kelleher, J.","year":"1984","unstructured":"Foster PN, Mitchell CJ,Robertson DRC, Hamilton I, Irving H, Kelleher J, et al. Prospective comparison of three noninvasive tests for pancreatic disease. BMJr 1984; 289: 13-6."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.160.1.3012631","article-title":"Biliary dilatation: defining the level and cause by real-time ultrasound","volume":"160","author":"Laing, F.C.; Brooke-Jeffrey, R.; Wing, V.W.; Nyberg, D.A.","year":"1986","unstructured":"Laing FC, Brooke-Jeffrey R, Wing VW, Nyberg DA. Biliary dilatation: defining the level and cause by real-time ultrasound. Radiology 1986; 160: 39-42.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.160.1.3520654","article-title":"Bile duct obstruction: radiologic evaluation of level, cause and tumour resectability","volume":"160","author":"Gibson, R.N.; Yeung, E.; Thompson, J.N.; Carr, D.H.; Hemingway, A.P.; Bradpiece, H.A.","year":"1986","unstructured":"Gibson RN, Yeung E, Thompson JN, Carr DH, Hemingway AP, Bradpiece HA, et al. Bile duct obstruction: radiologic evaluation of level, cause and tumour resectability. Radiology 1986; 160: 43-7.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"390","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(90)90217-S","article-title":"Ultrasound imaging of pancreas and biliary tract","volume":"335","author":"Lindseil, D.R.M.","year":"1990","unstructured":"Lindseil DRM. Ultrasound imaging of pancreas and biliary tract. Lancet 1990; 335: 390-3.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.293.6538.16","article-title":"Ultrasound diagnosis of bile duct calculi","volume":"293","author":"Tobin, M.V.; Mendelson, R.M.; Lamb, G.H.; Gilmore, I.T.","year":"1986","unstructured":"Tobin MV, Mendelson RM, Lamb GH, Gilmore IT. Ultrasound diagnosis of bile duct calculi. BMJ 1986; 293: 16-7.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.302.6772.303","article-title":"Laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"302","author":"Wastell, C.","year":"1991","unstructured":"Wastell C. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. BMJ 1991: 302: 303-4.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.302.6775.533-a","article-title":"Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. (Letter)","volume":"302","author":"Thompson, J.N.","year":"1991","unstructured":"Thompson JN. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. (Letter). BMJ 1991; 302: 533.","journal-title":"BMJ"}],"container-title":["Gut"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/gut.33.11.1559","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,6]],"date-time":"2025-12-06T08:04:53Z","timestamp":1765008293000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/gut.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/gut.33.11.1559"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1992,11]]},"references-count":8,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1992,11,1]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1992,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/gut.33.11.1559"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/gut.33.11.1559","relation":{},"ISSN":["0017-5749","1468-3288"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0017-5749","type":"print"},{"value":"1468-3288","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1992,11]]}}}