{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,26]],"date-time":"2026-06-26T22:43:09Z","timestamp":1782513789981,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"11","content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J Clin Pathol"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,27]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Aims<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>For the diagnostic workup of postmenopausal bleeding, histological examination of the endometrium is frequently performed. Failure of endometrial sampling due to insufficient material is often reported but objective criteria for quality assessment of endometrial biopsies are lacking. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the association between the amount of tissue obtained by endometrial sampling and the diagnostic accuracy, and to establish a cut-off level for a minimal amount of tissue required for a conclusive diagnosis.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>For this retrospective cohort study, clinicopathological data and Pipelle endometrial sampling slides of 139 patients who were treated with hysterectomy were collected. The surface of evaluable endometrial tissue was measured by means of structured digital assessment. The correlation between the predictive values in relation to the endometrial tissue surface was calculated for different cut-off values.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The median endometrial tissue surface was 4.7\u2005mm\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      (range 0.4\u2013156.4) for benign endometrium, 27.8\u2005mm\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      (range 0.0\u2013208.4) for premalignant endometrium and 43.8\u2005mm\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      (range 0.0\u2013223.6) for malignant endometrium. There was a significant association between the endometrial tissue surface and the correctness of diagnosis. A minimal endometrial tissue surface of 35\u2005mm\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      could be defined, for positive and negative predictive values of 92.6% and 85.7%, respectively.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The diagnostic accuracy of Pipelle endometrial sampling is associated with the amount of endometrial tissue surface, with a minimal cut-off value of 35\u2005mm\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      required to classify an endometrial sample as conclusive. Quantification of endometrial tissue can contribute to standardisation of quality assessment of endometrial samplings.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1136\/jclinpath-2017-204338","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,7]],"date-time":"2017-04-07T21:05:25Z","timestamp":1491599125000},"page":"941-946","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":25,"title":["Diagnostic accuracy of endometrial biopsy in relation to the amount of tissue"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"70","author":[{"given":"Casper","family":"Reijnen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nicole C M","family":"Visser","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Johan","family":"Bulten","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Leon F A G","family":"Massuger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Louis J M","family":"van der Putten","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Johanna M A","family":"Pijnenborg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025112110344416000_70.11.941.1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21208"},{"key":"2025112110344416000_70.11.941.2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2012.12.027"},{"key":"2025112110344416000_70.11.941.3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.280.17.1510"},{"key":"2025112110344416000_70.11.941.4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2010.11.010"},{"key":"2025112110344416000_70.11.941.5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0142(20001015)89:8<1765::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO;2-F"},{"key":"2025112110344416000_70.11.941.6","first-page":"539","article-title":"Comparison of the histopathological diagnoses of preoperative dilatation and curettage and Pipelle biopsy","volume":"35","author":"Gungorduk","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Gynaecol Oncol"},{"key":"2025112110344416000_70.11.941.7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-012-2438-8"},{"key":"2025112110344416000_70.11.941.8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1216","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12212","article-title":"Factors attributing to the failure of endometrial sampling in women with postmenopausal bleeding","volume":"92","author":"Visser","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"2025112110344416000_70.11.941.9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.1999.780914.x"},{"key":"2025112110344416000_70.11.941.10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/jcp.2005.029702"},{"key":"2025112110344416000_70.11.941.11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/jcp.2004.023564"},{"key":"2025112110344416000_70.11.941.12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00428-009-0824-9"},{"key":"2025112110344416000_70.11.941.13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0142(19850715)56:2<403::AID-CNCR2820560233>3.0.CO;2-X"},{"key":"2025112110344416000_70.11.941.14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.1997.tb00836.x","article-title":"The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia: a prospective study. Endometrial Hyperplasia Study Group","volume":"23","author":"Terakawa","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"2025112110344416000_70.11.941.15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1525-1438.1995.05030233.x"},{"key":"2025112110344416000_70.11.941.16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.21650"},{"key":"2025112110344416000_70.11.941.17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2009.24.1315"},{"key":"2025112110344416000_70.11.941.18","first-page":"3039261","article-title":"A structured assessment to decrease the amount of inconclusive endometrial biopsies in women with postmenopausal bleeding","volume":"2016","author":"Breijer","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2025112110344416000_70.11.941.19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"525","DOI":"10.1097\/PGP.0000000000000279","article-title":"Endometrial samples from postmenopausal women: a proposal for adequacy criteria","volume":"35","author":"Sakhdari","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Pathol"},{"key":"2025112110344416000_70.11.941.20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.4103\/0973-029X.185924","article-title":"Current status and future trends in telepathology and digital pathology","volume":"20","author":"Chordia","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Oral Maxillofac Pathol"},{"key":"2025112110344416000_70.11.941.21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1995.tb09066.x"}],"container-title":["Journal of Clinical Pathology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/jclinpath-2017-204338","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,21]],"date-time":"2025-11-21T18:34:54Z","timestamp":1763750094000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jcp.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/jclinpath-2017-204338"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,7]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,25]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/jclinpath-2017-204338"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/jclinpath-2017-204338","relation":{},"ISSN":["0021-9746","1472-4146"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0021-9746","type":"print"},{"value":"1472-4146","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,7]]}}}