{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T01:40:10Z","timestamp":1787017210636,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2014,7,25]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Requests for termination of pregnancy (TOP) at very early gestation (\u22646\u2005weeks) can prove challenging for abortion services as the ultrasound feature usually accepted as definitive evidence of an intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), the presence of a yolk sac within a gestational sac, may not yet be evident. In 2011 the Edinburgh TOP service introduced a protocol permitting women to proceed to treatment without further investigations provided that ultrasound showed the features of an eccentrically placed gestational sac (\u22653\u2005mm) with a decidual reaction, and there were no signs, symptoms or risk factors for ectopic pregnancy.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A retrospective audit was conducted of outcomes of women presenting for TOP at \u22646\u2005weeks\u2019 gestation over a 2-year period using the hospital computerised database.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 1155 women presented for TOP with an ultrasound gestational age of \u22646\u2005weeks. Of these, 1030 (89%) had ultrasound evidence of a yolk sac. Eighty-seven women (7.5%) had an eccentrically placed gestational sac with a decidual reaction. All 87 women fulfilled our criteria to proceed to medical TOP, and 66 did so. In the remaining 21 cases, further investigations were performed before they proceeded to medical TOP. Two (0.17%) medical TOPs failed, both in women whose initial ultrasound had shown a yolk sac.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Women with ultrasound features consistent with a very early IUP (\u22653\u2005mm eccentrically placed gestational sac with a decidual reaction) and without signs, symptoms or risk factors for ectopic pregnancy can proceed directly to medical TOP without the need for delay for further ultrasonography.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1136\/jfprhc-2014-100924","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,8]],"date-time":"2014-09-08T21:51:34Z","timestamp":1410213094000},"page":"90-95","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"title":["Termination of pregnancy at very early gestation without visible yolk sac on ultrasound"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"Rebecca","family":"Heller","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Clinical Research Fellow, Chalmers Sexual & Reproductive Health Service, Edinburgh, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sharon","family":"Cameron","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Consultant Gynaecologist, Chalmers Sexual & Reproductive Health Service, Edinburgh, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.1","unstructured":"World Health Organization (WHO). Safe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidance for Health Care Systems (2nd edn). 2012. http:\/\/www.who.int\/reproductivehealth\/publications\/unsafe_abortion\/9789241548434\/en\/ [accessed 17 October 2013]."},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.2","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion (Guideline No. 7). 2011. http:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/files\/rcog-corp\/Abortion%20guideline_web_1.pdf [accessed 17 October 2013]."},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.3","unstructured":"Ingham R Lee E . Evaluation of Early Medical Abortion (EMA) Pilot Sites. London, UK: Department of Health, 2008."},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McGalliard C Gaudoin M . Routine ultrasound for pregnancy termination requests increases women's choice and reduces inappropriate treatments. BJOG 2004;111:79\u201382.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00014.x"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dep084"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.9007"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00001703-199512000-00017"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"899","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02444.x","article-title":"Normal early pregnancy: serum hCG levels and vaginal ultrasonography findings","volume":"97","author":"Cacciatore","year":"1990","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.10","unstructured":"Information Services Division. Abortion Statistics 2012. May 2013. http:\/\/www.isdscotland.org\/Health-Topics\/Sexual-Health\/Publications\/2013-05-28\/2013-05-28-Abortions-Report.pdf?59875124693 [accessed 17 October 2013]."},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.11","unstructured":"The Abortion Act 1967. London, UK: HMSO, 1967."},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.12","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. The Management of Early Pregnancy Loss (Addendum to Green Top Guideline No. 25 October 2006). October 2011. http:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/files\/rcog-corp\/Addendum%20to%20GTG%20No%2025.pdf [accessed 20 January 2014]."},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.320.7239.916"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000130839.61098.12"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.32.7.1207"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"685","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2010.29.5.685","article-title":"First, do no harm \u2026 to early pregnancies","volume":"29","author":"Doubilet","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.17","first-page":"119","article-title":"Use of the double decidual sac sign and intradecidual sign","volume":"30","author":"Yeh","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.174.2.1688662","article-title":"Ectopic pregnancy: features at transvaginal sonography","volume":"174","author":"Fleischer","year":"1990","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.19","first-page":"986","article-title":"Transvaginal sonographic detection of the pseudogestational sac associated with ectopic pregnancy","volume":"75","author":"Hill","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1645","DOI":"10.1185\/03007990802120572","article-title":"Comparison of accuracy and certainty of results of six home pregnancy tests available over-the-counter","volume":"24","author":"Tomlinson","year":"2008","journal-title":"Curr Med Res Opin"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1185\/03007995.2010.545378","article-title":"Home pregnancy test compared to standard-of-care ultrasound dating in the assessment of pregnancy duration","volume":"27","author":"Johnson","year":"2011","journal-title":"Curr Med Res Opin"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70410-1"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.06.014"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(02)00316-5","article-title":"Clinicians\u2019 perception of sonogram indication for mifepristone abortion up to 63 days","volume":"66","author":"Fielding","year":"2002","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)30680-6","article-title":"The use of first trimester ultrasound","volume":"25","author":"Demianczuk","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol Can"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01293.x","article-title":"A comparison of women's, providers\u2019 and ultrasound assessment of pregnancy duration among termination of pregnancy clients in South Africa","volume":"114","author":"Blanchard","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02753.x","article-title":"Alternatives to routine ultrasound for eligibility assessment prior to early termination of pregnancy with mifepristone-misoprostol","volume":"118","author":"Bracken","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(99)10170-3"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(01)00200-1","article-title":"Mifepristone and misoprostol for early abortion when no gestational sac is present","volume":"63","author":"Schaff","year":"2001","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"855","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.10.013","article-title":"Effectiveness of early medical abortion using low-dose mifepristone and buccal misoprostol in women with no defined intrauterine gestational sac","volume":"87","author":"Goldstone","year":"2013","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2009.04.015","article-title":"Methotrexate with or without misoprostol to terminate pregnancies with no gestational sac visible by ultrasound","volume":"107","author":"Wiebe","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa044064"},{"key":"2025090511260783000_41.2.90.33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/14.2.485"}],"container-title":["Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/jfprhc-2014-100924","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,5]],"date-time":"2025-09-05T18:50:40Z","timestamp":1757098240000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jfprhc.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/jfprhc-2014-100924"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,8]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,20]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/jfprhc-2014-100924"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/jfprhc-2014-100924","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-1893","2045-2098"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-1893","type":"print"},{"value":"2045-2098","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,8]]}}}