{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]],"date-time":"2026-07-30T14:44:00Z","timestamp":1785422640065,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2015,2,15]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Intrauterine contraception is a first-line option for young women, yet relatively few prospective studies have been performed in nulliparous women using currently available devices, and many providers are still reluctant to provide this option.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Between January 2012 and June 2014, 109 nulliparous women, aged 18\u201330\u2005years, who had an intrauterine device (IUD) placed at a student health clinic [88 levonorgestrel-intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) users and 21 Cu T 380A (IUD) users] were surveyed at 1, 6, 12 and 18\u2005months after insertion.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Overall satisfaction was high; at follow-up survey 83% of 100 women (mean use 13.4\u2005months) were \u2018happy\u2019 or \u2018very happy\u2019 with their IUD, and there were no differences in satisfaction between the two IUD types. Some 75% of participants stated that the insertion procedure went \u2018very well\u2019, despite 78% rating insertion pain as moderate to severe, and 46% experiencing vasovagal symptoms. The 12-month continuation rate was 89%, with discontinuations for expulsion (3%), side effects (6%), lack of anticipated benefit (1%) and pregnancy (1%). Users of the Cu T 380A were more likely to have heavy menses (74% vs 2%; <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>&lt;0.0001) or moderate to severe cramping (68% vs 20%; <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>=0.0002) compared with LNG-IUS users. There were no uterine perforations or diagnoses of pelvic inflammatory disease. The rate of failed insertions during the study period was 6.2%.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Despite significant symptoms with insertion, intrauterine contraception is safe, effective and ultimately well tolerated in nulliparous women and should be provided to this population in both university and community health settings.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1136\/jfprhc-2014-101046","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,4,8]],"date-time":"2015-04-08T22:51:40Z","timestamp":1428533500000},"page":"36-42","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":38,"title":["Intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women: a prospective survey"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"42","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9805-6592","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alexandra M","family":"Hall","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Physician, University of Wisconsin \u2013 Stout Student Health Services, Menomonie, WI, USA"},{"name":"Physician, Gannett Health Services, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA (until June 2012)"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Beth A","family":"Kutler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Nurse Practitioner, Gannett Health Services, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,4,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182723b7d"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.2","unstructured":"Guttmacher Institute. Fact Sheet: Contraceptive use in the United States. June 2014. http:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/pubs\/fb_contr_use.html [accessed 9 July 2014]."},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.02.020","article-title":"Attitudes and beliefs about the intrauterine device among teenagers and young women","volume":"82","author":"Fleming","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.04.119"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"572","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.02.008","article-title":"Obstetrician-gynecologists and contraception: practice and opinions about the use of IUDs in nulliparous women, adolescents and other patient populations","volume":"89","author":"Luchowski","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/jfprhc-2012-100392"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/13625187.2011.558222"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/02699200802253706"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2003.11.008"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(02)00519-X"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31821188ad"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"592","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(81)90522-6","article-title":"The Pearl Pregnancy Index reexamined: still useful for clinical trials of contraceptives","volume":"139","author":"Shelton","year":"1981","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.13","first-page":"1","article-title":"US Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use 2010","volume":"59","author":"Centres for Disease Control","year":"2010","journal-title":"MMWR Recomm Rep"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2013.868424","article-title":"A prospective cohort study of pain with intrauterine device insertion among women with and without vaginal deliveries","volume":"34","author":"Allen","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/jfprhc-2012-100383"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"208.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.11.018","article-title":"Misoprostol for intrauterine device insertion in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"210","author":"Espey","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq348"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dem244"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.08.022"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.011"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.07.009"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.12.009"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"443","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.03.014","article-title":"Adolescent experience with intrauterine device insertion and use: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"86","author":"Bayer","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1002\/j.1879-3479.1976.tb00584.x","article-title":"Patients\u2019 responses to IUD insertion","volume":"14","author":"Berger","year":"1976","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.07.011"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"616","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.12.003","article-title":"A randomized, phase II study describing the efficacy, bleeding profile, and safety of two low-dose levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive systems and Mirena","volume":"97","author":"Gemzell-Danielsson","year":"2012","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1110855"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000144"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31828b63a0"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.3109\/13814780409044540","article-title":"Complications of the intrauterine device in nulliparous and parous women","volume":"10","author":"Veldhuis","year":"2004","journal-title":"Eur J Gen Pract"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1783\/147118903101197854"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2009.09.004","article-title":"Intrauterine contraception for adolescents aged 14\u201318 years: a multicenter randomized pilot study of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system compared to the Copper T 380A","volume":"81","author":"Godfrey","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpag.2010.07.001"},{"key":"2025090510481146000_42.1.36.34","unstructured":"Worcester S . Data support same-day IUD placement in women seeking contraceptive services. Ob.Gyn.News. 3 June 2014. http:\/\/www.obgynnews.com\/home\/article\/data-support-same-day-iud-placement-in-women-seeking-contraceptive-services\/daac2d 183ed60e64d773d0ddd68d52b8.html [accessed 9 July 2014]."}],"container-title":["Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/jfprhc-2014-101046","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,5]],"date-time":"2025-09-05T18:12:03Z","timestamp":1757095923000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jfprhc.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/jfprhc-2014-101046"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,4,8]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,12,23]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/jfprhc-2014-101046"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/jfprhc-2014-101046","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-1893","2045-2098"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-1893","type":"print"},{"value":"2045-2098","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,4,8]]}}}