{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,14]],"date-time":"2026-07-14T17:53:24Z","timestamp":1784051604619,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"9","content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J Med Ethics"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,18]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The antiabortion movement is increasingly using ostensibly scientific measurements such as \u2018fetal heartbeat\u2019 and \u2018fetal pain\u2019 to provide \u2018objective\u2019 evidence of the moral status of fetuses. However, there is little knowledge on how clinicians conceptualise and operationalise the moral status of fetuses. We interviewed obstetrician\/gynaecologists and neonatologists on this topic since their practice regularly includes clinical management of entities of the same gestational age. Contrary to our expectations, there was consensus among clinicians about conceptions of moral status regardless of specialty. First, clinicians tended to take a gradualist approach to moral status during pregnancy as they developed and viewed viability, the ability to live outside of the uterus, as morally significant. Second, in contrast to \u2018fetal pain\u2019 laws and philosophical discussions about the ethical salience of sentience, the clinicians in our study did not consider the ability to feel pain as a morally relevant factor in moral status determinations. Third, during previability and perviability, clinicians viewed moral status as a personal value decision, which should be made by pregnant people and parents of neonates.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1136\/jme-2022-108392","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,8]],"date-time":"2022-11-08T18:32:20Z","timestamp":1667932340000},"page":"634-639","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Clinicians\u2019 criteria for fetal moral status: viability and relationality, not sentience"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"50","author":[{"given":"Lisa","family":"Campo-Engelstein","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elise","family":"Andaya","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.1","unstructured":"Dubow S . Ourselves unborn: a history of the fetus in modern America. Oxford University Press, 2010."},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Morgan L . Icons of life: a cultural history of human embryos. Univ of California Press, 2009.","DOI":"10.1525\/9780520944725"},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jordan B . Authoritative knowledge and its construction. In: Davis-Floyd R , Sargent CF , eds. Childbirth and authoritative knowledge: cross-cultural perspectives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1997: 55\u201379.","DOI":"10.1525\/9780520918733-003"},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM198803173181105"},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2020.113558","article-title":"Conceptualizing pain and personhood in the Periviable period: perspectives from reproductive health and neonatal intensive care unit clinicians","volume":"269","author":"Andaya","year":"2021","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.6","unstructured":"Jaworska A , Tannenbaum J . The Grounds of Moral Status. In: Zalta EN , ed. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, 2021."},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.7","unstructured":"Warren MA . Moral status: obligations to persons and other living things. Clarendon Press, 1997."},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.8","unstructured":"Beauchamp TL , Childress JF . Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013."},{"issue":"2","key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2041-6962.2008.tb00075.x","article-title":"Moral status as a matter of degree?","volume":"46","author":"DeGrazia","year":"2008","journal-title":"South J Philos"},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Clarke S , Savulescu J . Rethinking our Assumptions about Moral Status. In: Clarke S , Zohny H , Savulescu J , eds. Rethinking moral status. Oxford (UK: Oxford University Press \u00a9 Stephen Clarke and Julian Savulescu, 2021.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780192894076.003.0001"},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.11","first-page":"331","volume-title":"Abortion and the margins of personhood","volume":"39","author":"Little","year":"2007"},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001105"},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.13","unstructured":"Campbell AV . Viability and the moral status of the fetus. Abortion: Medical Progress and Social Implications 2009;115."},{"issue":"5","key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1002\/hast.78","article-title":"Abortion bans premised on fetal pain capacity","volume":"42","author":"Watson","year":"2012","journal-title":"Hastings Cent Rep"},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2018-104910"},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"West R . Jurisprudence and gender. The University of Chicago Law Review 1988;55(1).doi:10.2307\/1599769","DOI":"10.2307\/1599769"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2002.001289","article-title":"One into two will not go: conceptualising conjoined twins","volume":"30","author":"Bratton","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Med Ethics"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"312","DOI":"10.1017\/S0963180120000869","article-title":"A problem of self-ownership for reproductive justice","volume":"30","author":"Lanphier","year":"2021","journal-title":"Camb Q Healthc Ethics"},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1009955129773"},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2016.12.007","article-title":"Ethical dimensions of the fetus as a patient","volume":"43","author":"Chervenak","year":"2017","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e175","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001485","article-title":"Committee opinion no. 664: refusal of medically recommended treatment during pregnancy","volume":"127","author":"No","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Thomson JJ . A defense of abortion. In: Biomedical ethics and the law. Springer, 1976: 39\u201354.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4684-2223-8_5"},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Francione GL . Taking sentience seriously. In: Animal rights. Routledge, 2017: 425\u201344.","DOI":"10.4324\/9781315262529-28"},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Singer P . Animal liberation. In: Animal rights. Springer, 1973: 7\u201318.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-349-25176-6_1"},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2017-104555"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-021-01179-z","article-title":"In search of the moral status of AI: why sentience is a strong argument","volume":"37","author":"Gibert","year":"2022","journal-title":"AI Soc"},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Steinbock B . Life before birth: the moral and legal status of embryos and fetuses. Oxford University Press, 2011.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780195341621.001.0001"},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199103073241010"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1007\/s12152-020-09430-y","article-title":"Nonconscious pain, suffering, and moral status","volume":"13","author":"Aguilera","year":"2020","journal-title":"Neuroethics"},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/14636770120092994"},{"issue":"7","key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1055","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9566.2008.01105.x","article-title":"New reproductive technologies, genetic counselling and the standing of the fetus: views from Germany and Israel","volume":"30","author":"Hashiloni-Dolev","year":"2008","journal-title":"Sociol Health Illn"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s12910-020-0458-7","article-title":"Still a moral dilemma: how Ethiopian professionals providing abortion come to terms with conflicting norms and demands","volume":"21","author":"Ewnetu","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMC Med Ethics"},{"issue":"9-10","key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1444","DOI":"10.1111\/jocn.13157","article-title":"Concealing emotions: nurses' experiences with induced abortion care","volume":"25","author":"Yang","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Clin Nurs"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s12910-019-0396-4","article-title":"When the law makes doors slightly open: ethical dilemmas among abortion service providers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia","volume":"20","author":"McLean","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMC Med Ethics"},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Metz T . An African theory of moral status: A relational alternative to individualism and holism. In: African environmental ethics. Springer, 2019: 9\u201327.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-18807-8_2"},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1086\/673431"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"310","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1088-4963.1999.00310.x","article-title":"Creation ethics: the moral status of early fetuses and the ethics of abortion","volume":"28","author":"Harman","year":"1999","journal-title":"Philos Public Aff"},{"issue":"8","key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"950","DOI":"10.1017\/can.2020.48","article-title":"It\u2019s Complicated: What our attitudes toward pregnancy, abortion, and miscarriage tell us about the moral status of early fetuses","volume":"50","author":"Chambers","year":"2020","journal-title":"Can J Philos"},{"key":"2024082103450685000_50.9.634.39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8519.2009.01715.x"}],"container-title":["Journal of Medical Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/jme-2022-108392","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,26]],"date-time":"2024-08-26T04:36:56Z","timestamp":1724647016000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jme.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/jme-2022-108392"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,8]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,21]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/jme-2022-108392"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/jme-2022-108392","relation":{},"ISSN":["0306-6800","1473-4257"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0306-6800","type":"print"},{"value":"1473-4257","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,8]]}}}