{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,22]],"date-time":"2026-04-22T09:59:54Z","timestamp":1776851994497,"version":"3.51.2"},"reference-count":48,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"5","funder":[{"name":"Stehr-Boldt Fellowship","award":["no award\/grant number"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["no award\/grant number"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J Med Ethics"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,15]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Artificial placentas (APs) are technologies developed to mimic the functioning of the human placenta to support extremely preterm infants in an artificial environment until the lungs are developed enough to support intensive care. AP trials will likely consist of two phases: the delivery into AP, which requires a C-section on the pregnant person, and the AP trial, which only involves the infant. This poses a unique challenge to the principle of respect for autonomy: What if parents disagree on trial participation? In the first phase, the pregnant person has the right to make the final decision as they are the one undergoing a C-section, but in the second phase, parents have equal rights. We identified three solutions. First, to only engage with the pregnant person. Although this is an actionable solution that respects the pregnant person\u2019s autonomy, it undermines the co-parent\u2019s autonomy. Second, to only enrol agreeing parents. This is again an actionable solution that superficially acknowledges the role of both parents, but it undermines the pregnant person\u2019s autonomy. We proposed a midway: Clinicians should engage both parents and strive for consensus. If consensus is not reached, then they should follow the pregnant person\u2019s decision. However, it must be clear from the beginning that once the infant is in the AP, for every other medical decision, both parents have equal rights and for entrenched disagreements they should resort to court. This has the advantage of providing an actionable solution while truly acknowledging the role and autonomy of both parents.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1136\/jme-2024-110485","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,28]],"date-time":"2025-07-28T17:20:23Z","timestamp":1753723223000},"page":"324-329","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Parental autonomy and ethical challenges in artificial placenta trials: addressing parental disagreements across phases of participation"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"52","author":[{"given":"Alice","family":"Cavolo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Zurich Institute of Biomedical Ethics History of Medicine, Zurich, Switzerland"},{"name":"Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Daniel","family":"Pizzolato","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium"},{"name":"European Network of Research Ethics Committees, Bonn, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/1742-4755-10-S1-S2","article-title":"Born Too Soon: The global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births","volume":"10","author":"Blencowe","year":"2013","journal-title":"Reprod Health"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/archdischild-2020-319798"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2018-0933","article-title":"Survival and Impairment of Extremely Premature Infants: A Meta-analysis","volume":"143","author":"Myrhaug","year":"2019","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.051"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.5821","article-title":"Artificial placenta and womb technology: Past, current, and future challenges towards clinical translation","volume":"41","author":"De Bie","year":"2021","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1109\/MSPEC.2021.9393995","article-title":"Artificial Wombs are Science Fiction: But Artificial Placentas are on the Horizon","volume":"58","author":"Zimmer","year":"2021","journal-title":"IEEE Spectr"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"392","DOI":"10.1111\/bioe.12701","article-title":"Artificial womb technology and clinical translation: Innovative treatment or medical research?","volume":"34","author":"Romanis","year":"2020","journal-title":"Bioethics"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.6521","article-title":"Ethical reflections on organizing the first human trial of artificial womb technologies","volume":"44","author":"Cavolo","year":"2024","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3138\/ijfab-15.1.01","article-title":"Should Delivery by Partial Ectogenesis Be Available on Request of the Pregnant Person?","volume":"15","author":"Nelson","year":"2022","journal-title":"Int J Fem Approaches Bioeth"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/ncomms15112"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1080\/15265161.2022.2160515","article-title":"The End of Personhood","volume":"24","author":"Blumenthal-Barby","year":"2024","journal-title":"Am J Bioeth"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.07.007","article-title":"Ethics of research in perinatal medicine","volume":"33","author":"Chervenak","year":"2009","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1520-6661(199605\/06)5:3<115::AID-MFM3>3.0.CO;2-P"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.124274"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1080\/15265161.2022.2048738","article-title":"Ethics Considerations Regarding Artificial Womb Technology for the Fetonate","volume":"23","author":"De Bie","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Bioeth"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1337","DOI":"10.1038\/s41372-023-01713-5","article-title":"Ethical challenges in first-in-human trials of the artificial placenta and artificial womb: not all technologies are created equally, ethically","volume":"43","author":"Kukora","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2015-0542"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1080\/15265161.2021.1925777","article-title":"Postponed Withholding: Balanced Decision-Making at the Margins of Viability","volume":"22","author":"Syltern","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Bioeth"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"426","DOI":"10.1016\/j.siny.2007.06.001","article-title":"Ethics of maternal-fetal surgery","volume":"12","author":"Chervenak","year":"2007","journal-title":"Semin Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1080\/15265161.2020.1867932","article-title":"A New Ethical Framework for Assessing the Unique Challenges of Fetal Therapy Trials","volume":"22","author":"Hendriks","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Bioeth"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"962","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.6163","article-title":"A new ethical framework to determine acceptable risks in fetal therapy trials","volume":"42","author":"Hendriks","year":"2022","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"476","DOI":"10.1017\/S0963180119000409","article-title":"Fetal Repair of Open Neural Tube Defects: Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues","volume":"28","author":"Radic","year":"2019","journal-title":"Camb Q Healthc Ethics"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/S0095-5108(02)00079-9","article-title":"Maternal-fetal research and human research protections policy","volume":"30","author":"Reitsma","year":"2003","journal-title":"Clin Perinatol"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1016\/S0095-5108(02)00080-5","article-title":"Maternal-fetal surgery for treatment of myelomeningocele","volume":"30","author":"Lyerly","year":"2003","journal-title":"Clin Perinatol"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110208856.233"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.26","unstructured":"National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research . The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. US Department of Health and Human Services 1979. Available: https:\/\/www.hhs.gov\/ohrp\/regulations-and-policy\/belmont-report\/read-the-belmont-report\/index.html"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sheppard MK . Informed consent in clinical trials of foetal therapies. els2018. 1\u20137.","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470015902.a0028015"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.siny.2017.09.008"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"910","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.5996","article-title":"'We did everything we could\u2019- a qualitative study exploring the acceptability of maternal-fetal surgery for spina bifida to parents","volume":"41","author":"Crombag","year":"2021","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.30","unstructured":"Beauchamp TL , Childress JF . Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th Ed. Oxford University Press, 2013."},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Resnik DB . The ethics of research with human subjects. Springer International Publishing, 2018.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-68756-8"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2021-107892"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2019-105495"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/bioe.12717"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2018-104910"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjpo-2020-000847","article-title":"Informed consent for neonatal trials: practical points to consider and a check list","volume":"4","author":"Aurich","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMJ Paediatr Open"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s12910-021-00702-7","article-title":"Neonatologists\u2019 decision-making for resuscitation and non-resuscitation of extremely preterm infants: ethical principles, challenges, and strategies\u2014a qualitative study","volume":"22","author":"Cavolo","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Med Ethics"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2014-102595"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1343","DOI":"10.1038\/s41372-023-01716-2","article-title":"The artificial placenta and EXTEND technologies: one of these things is not like the other","volume":"43","author":"Flake","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2008-1839"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1926","DOI":"10.1111\/apa.16866","article-title":"Adults born prematurely prefer a periviability guideline that considers multiple prognostic factors beyond gestational age","volume":"112","author":"De Proost","year":"2023","journal-title":"Acta Paediatr"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3389\/fped.2021.793308","article-title":"Ethical Development of Artificial Amniotic Sac and Placenta Technology: A Roadmap","volume":"9","author":"Verweij","year":"2021","journal-title":"Front Pediatr"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1080\/15265161.2023.2191054","article-title":"Artificial Placenta - Imminent Ethical Considerations for Research Trials and Clinical Translation","volume":"23","author":"Verweij","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Bioeth"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1177\/17470161241259127","article-title":"Expanding the ethical debate on human artificial placenta trials","volume":"21","author":"Cavolo","year":"2025","journal-title":"Res Ethics"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1748-720X.2007.00123.x"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8519.2012.02008.x","article-title":"Randomized controlled trials of maternal-fetal surgery: a challenge to clinical equipoise","volume":"28","author":"Rodrigues","year":"2014","journal-title":"Bioethics"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2020-106102","article-title":"Ethics of resuscitation for extremely premature infants: a systematic review of argument-based literature","volume":"47","author":"Cavolo","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Med Ethics"},{"key":"2026042202101079000_52.5.324.48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1651-2227.2008.00752.x"}],"container-title":["Journal of Medical Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/jme-2024-110485","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,22]],"date-time":"2026-04-22T09:12:04Z","timestamp":1776849124000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jme.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/jme-2024-110485"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,28]]},"references-count":48,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,22]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/jme-2024-110485"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/jme-2024-110485","relation":{},"ISSN":["0306-6800","1473-4257"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0306-6800","type":"print"},{"value":"1473-4257","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,28]]}}}