{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,21]],"date-time":"2026-08-21T12:17:07Z","timestamp":1787314627822,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"9","content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J Med Ethics"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,26]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Unlike some critics of the dead donor rule, I do not defend consequentialism or deny the personhood of any potential organ donor. Instead, I argue that the principles of ethics and action theory that support the dead donor rule also prohibit widely accepted procedures, including kidney and partial liver transplants from living donors, fetal surgeries that permanently damage the uterus, sequential or domino liver transplants and lethal palliation. If physicians sometimes may cause death as a result of relieving a patient\u2019s pain, then they sometimes may cause death as a result of fulfilling the patient\u2019s desire to donate a vital organ.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1136\/jme-2025-111150","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,23]],"date-time":"2025-12-23T10:50:16Z","timestamp":1766487016000},"page":"585-590","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Non-consequentialist and egalitarian objections to the dead donor rule"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"52","author":[{"given":"Lawrence J","family":"Masek","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Philosophy Department, Ohio Dominican University, Columbus, Ohio, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s11017-018-9432-5","article-title":"How (not) to think of the \u201cdead-donor\u201d rule","volume":"39","author":"Omelianchuk","year":"2018","journal-title":"Theor Med Bioeth"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.2307\/3527865","article-title":"The dead donor rule","volume":"29","author":"Robertson","year":"1999","journal-title":"Hastings Cent Rep"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1080\/15265161.2022.2159096","article-title":"The Dead Donor Rule Does Require that the Donor is Dead","volume":"23","author":"Ross","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Bioeth"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.2478\/ebce-2018-0012","article-title":"The challenge of brain death for the sanctity of life ethic","volume":"8","author":"Singer","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ethics & Bioethics"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2011-100351"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.2478\/ebce-2018-0013","article-title":"Brain death as irreversible loss of a human\u2019s moral status","volume":"8","author":"Nowak","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ethics & Bioethics"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2015-103224"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shewmon DA . Brain Death: A Conclusion in Search of a Justification. Hastings Center Report 2018;48. doi:10.1002\/hast.947","DOI":"10.1002\/hast.947"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Busch EN , Mjaaland M . What is death and why do we insist on the dead donor rule. Am J Bioeth 2023;24. doi:10.1080\/15265161.2023.2201205","DOI":"10.1080\/15265161.2023.2201205"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1177\/00243639231162436","article-title":"Double-Effect Donation or Bodily Respect? A \u201cThird Way\u201d Response to Camosy and Vukov","volume":"90","author":"McCarthy","year":"2023","journal-title":"Linacre Q"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stuchlik J . Intention and wrongdoing: in defense of double effect. Cambridge: Cambridge, 2022:127\u20138.","DOI":"10.1017\/9781009030410"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.12","unstructured":"McFadden C . Medical ethics. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis, 1967:288\u201391."},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/jme-2023-109728"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"509","DOI":"10.1038\/s41581-021-00407-5","article-title":"Risk of kidney disease after living kidney donation","volume":"17","author":"Matas","year":"2021","journal-title":"Nat Rev Nephrol"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.15","unstructured":"Killing JSJ , Die L . The ethics of organ transplantation. Washington: Catholic University of America, 2011."},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1080\/15265161.2022.2040646","article-title":"Does Controlled Donation after Circulatory Death Violate the Dead Donor Rule?","volume":"23","author":"Nielsen Busch","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Bioeth"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1007\/s11017-018-9453-0","article-title":"Proportionate palliative sedation and the giving of a deadly drug: the conundrum","volume":"39","author":"Cavanaugh","year":"2018","journal-title":"Theor Med Bioeth"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/jmp\/jhq019"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"648","DOI":"10.1111\/bioe.13025","article-title":"Can double\u2010effect reasoning justify lethal organ donation?","volume":"36","author":"Omelianchuk","year":"2022","journal-title":"Bioethics"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1177\/00243639211038128","article-title":"Double-Effect Donation Disputed","volume":"89","author":"Cavanaugh","year":"2022","journal-title":"Linacre Q"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"442","DOI":"10.1093\/jmp\/jhz008","article-title":"Lethal Organ Donation: Would the Doctor Intend the Donor\u2019s Death?","volume":"44","author":"Bronner","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Med Philos"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1177\/0024363921989477","article-title":"Double Effect Donation","volume":"88","author":"Camosy","year":"2021","journal-title":"Linacre Q"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.23","unstructured":"Anscombe GEM . Intention. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Harvard, 1963:9."},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.24","unstructured":"Bratman M . Intentions, plans, and practical reason. Cambridge: Harvard, 1999:23."},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"525","DOI":"10.5840\/ncbq202020347","article-title":"Phoenix rising from the ashes: recent attempts to revive new natural law action theory","volume":"20","author":"Jensen","year":"2020","journal-title":"Natl Cathol Bioeth Q"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s11017-022-09557-4","article-title":"The inviolateness of life and equal protection: a defense of the dead-donor rule","volume":"43","author":"Omelianchuk","year":"2022","journal-title":"Theor Med Bioeth"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.27","first-page":"S36","article-title":"A Defense of the Dead Donor Rule","volume":"48 Suppl 4","author":"Magnus","year":"2018","journal-title":"Hastings Cent Rep"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8519.2010.01811.x"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5840\/monist197659224"},{"key":"2026082002251564000_52.9.585.30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1080\/15265161.2022.2159574","article-title":"The Dead Donor Rule Is Not Morally Sufficient","volume":"23","author":"Napier","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Bioeth"}],"container-title":["Journal of Medical Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/jme-2025-111150","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,20]],"date-time":"2026-08-20T09:26:10Z","timestamp":1787217970000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jme.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/jme-2025-111150"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,23]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,20]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/jme-2025-111150"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/jme-2025-111150","relation":{},"ISSN":["0306-6800","1473-4257"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0306-6800","type":"print"},{"value":"1473-4257","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,23]]}}}