{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,5]],"date-time":"2026-08-05T03:53:30Z","timestamp":1785902010218,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":10,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Med Ethics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The idea of passive euthanasia has recently been attacked in a particularly clear and explicit way by an \u201cEthics Task Force\u201d established by the European Association of Palliative Care (EAPC) in February 2001. It claims that the expression \u201cpassive euthanasia\u201d is a contradiction in terms and hence that there can be no such thing. This paper critically assesses the main arguments for the Task Force\u2019s view. Three arguments are considered. Firstly, an argument based on the (supposed) wrongness of euthanasia and the (supposed) permissibility of what is often called passive euthanasia. Secondly, the claim that passive euthanasia (so-called) cannot really be euthanasia because it does not cause death. And finally, a consequence based argument which appeals to the (alleged) bad consequences of accepting the category of passive euthanasia.<\/jats:p><jats:p>We conclude that although healthcare professionals\u2019 nervousness about the concept of passive euthanasia is understandable, there is really no reason to abandon the category provided that it is properly and narrowly understand and provided that \u201ceuthanasia reasons\u201d for withdrawing or withholding life-prolonging treatment are carefully distinguished from other reasons.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2003.005777","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2005,1,28]],"date-time":"2005-01-28T22:05:05Z","timestamp":1106949905000},"page":"64-68","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":44,"title":["Passive euthanasia"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"31","author":[{"given":"E","family":"Garrard","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S","family":"Wilkinson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2005,1,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"2024052223111883000_31.2.64.1","first-page":"78","volume":"2","year":"1975","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"2024052223111883000_31.2.64.2","unstructured":"House of Lords. Report of the Select Committee on Medical Ethics. HL Paper 21-I. London: HMSO 1994, para 21, page 10."},{"key":"2024052223111883000_31.2.64.3","unstructured":"BMA. Conference report on physician assisted suicide: a conference to promote consensus. 3\u00e2\u0080\u00934 March 2000. Downloaded from www.bma.org.uk\/ap.nsf\/Content\/pas+project+-+terminology (accessed 24 June 2003)."},{"key":"2024052223111883000_31.2.64.4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1191\/0269216303pm673oa"},{"key":"2024052223111883000_31.2.64.5","unstructured":"See reference 4:98."},{"key":"2024052223111883000_31.2.64.6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1191\/0269216303pm671ed"},{"key":"2024052223111883000_31.2.64.7","unstructured":"Medical Treatment (Prevention of Euthanasia) Bill 2000, UK Parliament."},{"key":"2024052223111883000_31.2.64.8","unstructured":"See reference 4:97\u00e2\u0080\u00938."},{"key":"2024052223111883000_31.2.64.9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R v Bodkin Adams [1957] Crim LR 365 (Central Criminal Court 9 April 1957).","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-2311.1957.tb01010.x"},{"key":"2024052223111883000_31.2.64.10","first-page":"298","volume":"50","year":"2000","journal-title":"Philos Q"}],"container-title":["Journal of Medical Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/jme.2003.005777","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,23]],"date-time":"2024-05-23T07:24:55Z","timestamp":1716449095000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jme.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/jme.2003.005777"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2005,1,28]]},"references-count":10,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2005,1,28]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,2]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/jme.2003.005777"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/jme.2003.005777","relation":{},"ISSN":["0306-6800","1473-4257"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0306-6800","type":"print"},{"value":"1473-4257","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2005,1,28]]}}}