{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,31]],"date-time":"2025-10-31T07:02:18Z","timestamp":1761894138039,"version":"3.44.0"},"reference-count":4,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"7","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Med Ethics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>A request to admit a hospital inpatient with motor neurone disease to the hospice generated unusual unease. Significantly, withdrawal of ventilation had already been planned. The presumption that ventilation would be withdrawn after transfer presented a dilemma. Should the hospice accept the admission? If so, should the hospice staff stop the ventilation, and then when and how? Debate centred on the continuity of best interests and the logistics of withdrawing ventilation. The factors making the request contentious identified competing interests within hospice admission decision making that could detrimentally impact on patient care.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2004.010777","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2005,6,30]],"date-time":"2005-06-30T21:56:04Z","timestamp":1120168564000},"page":"383-384","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["A request for hospice admission from hospital to withdraw ventilation"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"31","author":[{"given":"C","family":"Gannon","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2005,6,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025092413303326000_31.7.383.1","unstructured":"British Medical Association. Withholding and Withdrawing Life-prolonging Medical Treatment. Guidance for Decision-making. 2nd edn. London: BMJ Books, 2001."},{"key":"2025092413303326000_31.7.383.2","first-page":"124","volume":"4","year":"1997","journal-title":"Eur J Palliat Care"},{"key":"2025092413303326000_31.7.383.3","unstructured":"Re B. (Consent to treatment: capacity). All ER 449 2002."},{"key":"2025092413303326000_31.7.383.4","unstructured":"Re (Burke) v. The General Medical Council. EWHC 1879 (Admin) 2004."}],"container-title":["Journal of Medical Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/jme.2004.010777","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,24]],"date-time":"2025-09-24T20:30:38Z","timestamp":1758745838000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jme.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/jme.2004.010777"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2005,6,30]]},"references-count":4,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2005,6,30]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/jme.2004.010777"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/jme.2004.010777","relation":{},"ISSN":["0306-6800","1473-4257"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0306-6800"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1473-4257"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2005,6,30]]}}}