{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,17]],"date-time":"2026-09-17T14:57:37Z","timestamp":1789657057098,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"5","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Med Ethics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>A number of prominent bioethicists, such as Parker, Lucassen and Knoppers, have called for the adoption of a system in which by default genetic information is shared among family members. This paper suggests that a main reason given in support of this call to share genetic information among family members is the idea that genetic information is essentially familial in nature. On examining this \u201cfamilial nature of genetics\u201d argument, the paper shows that most genetic information is only shared in a weaker way among family members and does not necessarily lead to the actual manifestation of particular diseases. The upshot is that the idea that genetic information is familial in nature does not provide sufficient ground for moving towards a system in which by default genetic information is shared among family members.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2008.027029","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,4,30]],"date-time":"2009-04-30T17:23:58Z","timestamp":1241112238000},"page":"306-309","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":31,"title":["Is there a duty to share genetic information?"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"35","author":[{"given":"S M","family":"Liao","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2009,4,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"2024052300483414000_35.5.306.1","unstructured":"House of Commons Select Committee on Science and Technology. Human genetics: the science and its consequences. London: HMSO, 1995."},{"key":"2024052300483414000_35.5.306.2","unstructured":"General Medical Council. Confidentiality: protecting and providing information. 2004. http:\/\/www.gmc-uk.org\/guidance\/current\/library\/confidentiality.asp (accessed 12 Aug 2008)."},{"key":"2024052300483414000_35.5.306.3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2005.013631"},{"key":"2024052300483414000_35.5.306.4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1086\/301707"},{"key":"2024052300483414000_35.5.306.5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.329.7458.165"},{"key":"2024052300483414000_35.5.306.6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0167-7799(01)01879-0"},{"key":"2024052300483414000_35.5.306.7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2006.017467"},{"key":"2024052300483414000_35.5.306.8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"392","DOI":"10.1038\/35072029","article-title":"Protecting genetic privacy.","volume":"2","author":"Roche","year":"2001","journal-title":"Nat Rev Genet"},{"key":"2024052300483414000_35.5.306.9","unstructured":"Murray T . Genetic exceptionalism and \u201cfuture diaries\u201d: is genetic information different from other medical information? In: Rothstein M , ed. Genetic secrets. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997:60\u201375."},{"key":"2024052300483414000_35.5.306.10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00291677"},{"key":"2024052300483414000_35.5.306.11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-143-5-200509060-00012"},{"key":"2024052300483414000_35.5.306.12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1098\/rstb.1999.0539"},{"key":"2024052300483414000_35.5.306.13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ashcroft A Lucassen A Parker M . Case analysis in clinical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511545450"},{"key":"2024052300483414000_35.5.306.14","unstructured":"Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California (Tarasoff I), 529 P 2d 553. 118 Cal Rptr 129 (Cal 1974).."}],"container-title":["Journal of Medical Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/jme.2008.027029","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,23]],"date-time":"2024-05-23T09:36:19Z","timestamp":1716456979000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jme.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/jme.2008.027029"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,4,30]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2009,4,30]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/jme.2008.027029"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/jme.2008.027029","relation":{},"ISSN":["0306-6800","1473-4257"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0306-6800","type":"print"},{"value":"1473-4257","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,4,30]]}}}