{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,6]],"date-time":"2026-10-06T08:25:47Z","timestamp":1791275147981,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":9,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Med Ethics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2003,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Women (N=21) who had had breast cancer and had been enrolled in a large genetic breast cancer epidemiological study were interviewed about their experience of participation in the study, their attitudes to the confidentiality of data, and the feedback of personal and general research results. Collection of family history information seemed more salient in indicating the genetic nature of the study than the enrolment information sheet. There were no concerns about confidentiality.<\/jats:p><jats:p>While participants would have welcomed general feedback about the results of the study and were critical that this had not been provided, the feedback of personal information proved complicated and, sometimes, difficult. It is suggested that individual feedback of genetic test information in epidemiological studies should be undertaken only when there are specific reasons.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.29.2.93","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2003,4,3]],"date-time":"2003-04-03T00:45:19Z","timestamp":1049330719000},"page":"93-96","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":43,"title":["Issues of consent and feedback in a genetic epidemiological study of women with breast cancer: Table 1"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"29","author":[{"given":"M P M","family":"Richards","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M","family":"Ponder","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"P","family":"Pharoah","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S","family":"Everest","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J","family":"Mackay","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2003,4,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"2024052910412297000_29.2.93.1","unstructured":"Human Genetics Commission. Whose hands on your genes? London: Human Genetics Commission, 2000. Also at www.hgc.gov.uk"},{"key":"2024052910412297000_29.2.93.2","unstructured":"Human Genetics Commission. Inside information. Balancing interests in the use of personal genetic information. London: Human Genetics Information, 2002. Also at www.hgc.gov.uk"},{"key":"2024052910412297000_29.2.93.3","unstructured":"Martin P, Kaye J. The use of biological sample collections and personal medical information in human genetic research. London: Wellcome Trust, 1996."},{"key":"2024052910412297000_29.2.93.4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/35066094"},{"key":"2024052910412297000_29.2.93.5","unstructured":"Knoppers B. Of populations, genetics and banks. Genetic Law Monitor 2000;Jan\/Feb:3\u00e2\u0080\u00936."},{"key":"2024052910412297000_29.2.93.6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.ejhg.5200530"},{"key":"2024052910412297000_29.2.93.7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1054\/bjoc.2000.1407"},{"key":"2024052910412297000_29.2.93.8","unstructured":"Medical Research Council. Human tissue and biological samples for use in research. Operational and ethical guidelines. London: Medical Research Council, 2001. Also at www.mrc.ac.uk"},{"key":"2024052910412297000_29.2.93.9","unstructured":"Wellcome Trust\/Medical Research Council. Public perceptions of the collection of human biological samples. London: Wellcome Trust\/Medical Research Council, 2000. Also at www.wellcome.ac.uk and www.mrc.ac.uk"}],"container-title":["Journal of Medical Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/jme.29.2.93","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,29]],"date-time":"2024-05-29T17:41:32Z","timestamp":1717004492000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jme.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/jme.29.2.93"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2003,4]]},"references-count":9,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2003,4,1]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2003,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/jme.29.2.93"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/jme.29.2.93","relation":{},"ISSN":["0306-6800","1473-4257"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0306-6800","type":"print"},{"value":"1473-4257","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2003,4]]}}}