{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,25]],"date-time":"2025-09-25T00:22:43Z","timestamp":1758759763289,"version":"3.44.0"},"reference-count":10,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"12","content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J Med Ethics"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2012,7,31]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>During spring 2009 a Swedish senior paediatric intensivist and associate professor was detained and later prosecuted for mercy-killing a child with severe brain damage. The intensivist was accused of having used high doses of thiopental after having withdrawn life-sustaining treatment when the child was imminently dying. After more than 2.5\u2005years of investigation the physician was acquitted by the Stockholm City Court. The court additionally stated that the physician had provided good end-of-life care. Since the trial it has become evident that the accusation was based on a problematic medicolegal report. Nevertheless, the event has had severe negative consequences for the physician personally and professionally, and probably also, in general, for patients in the final stage of life. This case illustrates, together with other cases, that there is a lack of correspondence between ethical soft law\/healthcare law and the Penal Code. To optimise medical practice we suggest that the criminal law be carefully examined and if possible changed. Furthermore, we suggest a peer-review system for assessing medicolegal reports in cases of suspected homicide.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2012-100681","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,7,31]],"date-time":"2013-07-31T03:35:07Z","timestamp":1375241707000},"page":"772-775","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Police in an intensive care unit: what can happen?"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"39","author":[{"given":"Niels","family":"Lyn\u00f8e","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre for Healthcare Ethics (CHE), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Madeleine","family":"Leijonhufvud","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Law, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,7,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025092414552942000_39.12.772.1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1651-2227.2009.01394.x"},{"key":"2025092414552942000_39.12.772.2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2125.2008.03231.x"},{"issue":"(7309)","key":"2025092414552942000_39.12.772.3","first-page":"389","article-title":"Ethical debate: the distinction between withdrawing life sustaining treatment under the influence of paralysing agents and euthanasia. Paralysing agents may be given up to but not at or beyond the point of extubation","volume":"323","author":"Inwald","year":"2001","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025092414552942000_39.12.772.4","unstructured":"Socialstyrelsen. The National Board of Health and Welfare's regulations and general advice about life-sustaining treatment. http:\/\/www.socialstyrelsen.se\/sosfs\/2011-7 (accessed 5 Apr 2013)."},{"key":"2025092414552942000_39.12.772.5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.330.7488.415"},{"key":"2025092414552942000_39.12.772.6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lyn\u00f8e N Juth N . Does proficiency creativity solve legal dilemmas? Experimental study of medical students\u2019 ideas about death-causes. Med Health Care Philos. Published Online First: 20 Dec 2012. doi:10.1007\/s11019-012-9460-2","DOI":"10.1007\/s11019-012-9460-2"},{"issue":"(7)","key":"2025092414552942000_39.12.772.7","first-page":"330","article-title":"The prosecutor general initiate special healthcare prosecutors","volume":"110","author":"Gunnarsdotter","year":"2013","journal-title":"Swed Med J (L\u00e4kartidningen)"},{"key":"2025092414552942000_39.12.772.8","first-page":"2701","article-title":"Gunnarsdotter S. The National Board of Health and Welfare found no misconduct in the Astrid Lindgren case","volume":"106","year":"2009","journal-title":"Swed Med J (L\u00e4kartidningen)"},{"issue":"(51)","key":"2025092414552942000_39.12.772.9","first-page":"2694","article-title":"Acquitted\u2014after two years, eight month and nine days","volume":"108","author":"Gunnarsdotter","year":"2011","journal-title":"Swed Med J (L\u00e4kartidningen)"},{"issue":"(19)","key":"2025092414552942000_39.12.772.10","first-page":"942","article-title":"No critique of the prosecutor (In the Astrid Lindgren case)","volume":"109","author":"Gunnarsdotter","year":"2012","journal-title":"Swed Med J (L\u00e4kartidningen)"}],"container-title":["Journal of Medical Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/medethics-2012-100681","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,24]],"date-time":"2025-09-24T21:55:40Z","timestamp":1758750940000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jme.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/medethics-2012-100681"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,7,30]]},"references-count":10,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,11,15]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/medethics-2012-100681"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/medethics-2012-100681","relation":{},"ISSN":["0306-6800","1473-4257"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0306-6800"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1473-4257"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,7,30]]}}}