{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,13]],"date-time":"2026-02-13T20:28:46Z","timestamp":1771014526070,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"6","content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J Med Ethics"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2014,7,29]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>In a host surrogate motherhood arrangement, the surrogate agrees to be implanted with, and carry to term, an embryo created from the commissioning couple's gametes. When the surrogate child is born, it is the surrogate mother who, according to UK law, holds the legal status of mother. By contrast, the commissioning mother possesses no maternal status and she can only attain it once the surrogate agrees to the completion of the arrangement. One consequence of this is that, in the event that a host arrangement fails, the commissioning mother is left without maternal status. In this paper, I argue that this denial of maternal status misrepresents the commissioning mother's role in the host arrangement and her relationship with the surrogate child. Consequently, I suggest that commissioning mothers participating in host surrogacy arrangements ought to be granted the status of mother in the event that the arrangement fails.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2012-100949","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,20]],"date-time":"2014-08-20T05:17:04Z","timestamp":1408511824000},"page":"470-473","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["One mum too few: maternal status in host surrogate motherhood arrangements"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"Stuart","family":"Oultram","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025092413531645000_41.6.470.1","unstructured":"Surrogacy Arrangements Act 1985. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HMSO). http:\/\/www.legislation.gov.uk\/ukpga\/1985\/49\/section\/1 (accessed 10 Oct 2013)."},{"key":"2025092413531645000_41.6.470.2","unstructured":"Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HMSO). http:\/\/www.legislation.gov.uk\/ukpga\/2008\/22\/contents (accessed 10 Oct 2013)."},{"key":"2025092413531645000_41.6.470.3","unstructured":"Herring J . Medical law and ethics. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010."},{"key":"2025092413531645000_41.6.470.4","unstructured":"Rae S . The ethics of commercial surrogate motherhood: brave new families. USA: Praeger (West Point), 1994."},{"key":"2025092413531645000_41.6.470.5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-5930.00194","article-title":"Are you my mommy? On the genetic basis of parenthood","volume":"18","author":"Kolers","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Appl Philos"},{"key":"2025092413531645000_41.6.470.6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jonas M . Choosing between claims: allocating parental responsibility in surrogacy disputes. In: H\u00e4yry M Takala T Herissone-Kelly P , eds. Bioethics and social reality. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2005.","DOI":"10.1163\/9789401201353_008"},{"key":"2025092413531645000_41.6.470.7","unstructured":"Genetic parents win surrogate twins case. The Irish Times, 6 Mar 2013. http:\/\/www.irishtimes.com\/news\/crime-and-law\/genetic-parents-win-surrogate-twins-case-1.1318123 (accessed 17 Apr 2013)."},{"key":"2025092413531645000_41.6.470.8","unstructured":"Wingfield M . Mary Wingfield: Surrogacy ruling will have disastrous fallout if we don't legislate right away. Irish Independent, 7 Mar 2013. http:\/\/www.independent.ie\/opinion\/analysis\/mary-wingfield-surrogacy-ruling-will-have-disastrous-fallout-if-we-dont-legislate-right-away-29114683.html (accessed 17 Apr 2013)."},{"key":"2025092413531645000_41.6.470.9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-2230.2010.00790.x","article-title":"The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act (2008) and the tenacity of the sexual family form","volume":"73","author":"McCandless","year":"2010","journal-title":"Mod Law Rev"},{"key":"2025092413531645000_41.6.470.10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-5930.1986.tb00370.x","article-title":"Gifts of Gametes: reflections about surrogacy","volume":"3","author":"Trusted","year":"1986","journal-title":"J Appl Philos"},{"key":"2025092413531645000_41.6.470.11","unstructured":"Camber R . Couple launch custody battle after surrogate mother decides to keep babies. The Daily Mail, 21 Jan 2007. http:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/news\/article-431168\/Couple-launch-custody-battle-surrogate-mother-decides-babies.html (accessed 14 Apr 2013)."},{"key":"2025092413531645000_41.6.470.12","first-page":"165","article-title":"Which came first: the mother or the egg? A Kinship solution to gestational surrogacy?","volume":"47","author":"Kandel","year":"1994","journal-title":"Rutgers Law Rev"},{"key":"2025092413531645000_41.6.470.13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wallbank J . Too many Mothers? Surrogacy, Kinship, and the welfare of the child. Med Law Rev 2002;10.","DOI":"10.1093\/medlaw\/10.3.271"},{"key":"2025092413531645000_41.6.470.14","unstructured":"Gambel N . Legal status: parental responsibility. Natalie Gamble Associates. http:\/\/www.nataliegambleassociates.co.uk\/page\/Parental-responsibility\/58\/ (accessed 20 Mar 2014)."},{"key":"2025092413531645000_41.6.470.15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2011.043745","article-title":"On triparenting. Is having three committed parents better than having only two?","volume":"37","author":"Cutas","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Med Ethics"},{"key":"2025092413531645000_41.6.470.16","unstructured":"Golombok S . Parenting. London: Routledge, 2000."},{"key":"2025092413531645000_41.6.470.17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wilkinson S . Bodies for sale: ethics and exploitation in the human body trade. London: Routledge, 2003.","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203480724"},{"key":"2025092413531645000_41.6.470.18","unstructured":"Roberts E . \u201cNative\u201d narratives of connectedness. In: Davies-Floyd R Dumit J , eds. Cyborg babies: from techno-sex to techno-tots. New York: Routledge, 1998."}],"container-title":["Journal of Medical Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/medethics-2012-100949","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,24]],"date-time":"2025-09-24T20:53:27Z","timestamp":1758747207000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jme.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/medethics-2012-100949"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,19]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,5,22]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,6]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/medethics-2012-100949"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/medethics-2012-100949","relation":{},"ISSN":["0306-6800","1473-4257"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0306-6800","type":"print"},{"value":"1473-4257","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,19]]}}}