{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,24]],"date-time":"2025-09-24T21:10:16Z","timestamp":1758748216609,"version":"3.44.0"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J Med Ethics"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,24]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Gestational surrogacy relies on a legal agreement between the surrogate and the intended parents to define the roles and responsibilities of the parties, including explicit consent by the surrogate to allow the physician to release all pregnancy-related medical information to the intended parents. In the event of surrogate misconduct, however, physicians may feel conflicted if the surrogate asks the physician to withhold information about potentially dangerous behaviour in pregnancy from the intended parents. While the American Society for Reproductive Medicine guidelines may support disclosure over the objections of the surrogate, the authors argue that such disclosure is a violation of the surrogate\u2019s rights and the physician\u2019s ethical and professional duties. A surrogate\u2019s confidentiality must be maintained as it is an essential element of the physician\u2013patient relationship.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2017-104518","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,13]],"date-time":"2018-06-13T12:20:22Z","timestamp":1528892422000},"page":"213-217","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["A surrogate\u2019s secrets are(n\u2019t) safe with me: patient confidentiality in the care of a gestational surrogate"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"47","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8351-2380","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Claire","family":"Horner","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Paul","family":"Burcher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, WellSpan York Hospital, York, Pennsylvania, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025092413350534000_47.4.213.1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.11.007","article-title":"Misconduct in third-party assisted reproduction: a committee opinion","volume":"101","author":"Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025092413350534000_47.4.213.2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e97","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001352","article-title":"ACOG committee opinion no. 660: family building through gestational surrogacy","volume":"127","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists\u2019 Committee on Ethics","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2025092413350534000_47.4.213.3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1111\/fcre.12330","article-title":"Our baby, her choices","volume":"56","author":"Lollo","year":"2018","journal-title":"Fam Court Rev"},{"key":"2025092413350534000_47.4.213.4","first-page":"146","article-title":"When patient-physician confidentiality conflicts with the law","volume":"11","author":"Schleiter","year":"2009","journal-title":"Virtual Mentor"},{"key":"2025092413350534000_47.4.213.5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e175","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001485","article-title":"Committee opinion no. 664: refusal of medically recommended treatment during pregnancy","volume":"127","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists\u2019 Committee on Ethics","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2025092413350534000_47.4.213.6","first-page":"29","article-title":"Abortion clauses in surrogacy contracts: insights from a case study","volume":"49","author":"Forman","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fam Law Q"},{"key":"2025092413350534000_47.4.213.7","first-page":"705","article-title":"The AMA Code of Medical Ethics' opinions on confidentiality of patient information","volume":"13","author":"American Medical Association","year":"2011","journal-title":"Virtual Mentor"},{"key":"2025092413350534000_47.4.213.8","unstructured":"Planned parenthood v. casey 505 U.S. 833. 1992."},{"key":"2025092413350534000_47.4.213.9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1080\/15265160802331678","article-title":"A critique of the \u2019fetus as patient'","volume":"8","author":"Lyerly","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Bioeth"},{"key":"2025092413350534000_47.4.213.10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1520-6661(199605\/06)5:3<115::AID-MFM3>3.0.CO;2-P"},{"key":"2025092413350534000_47.4.213.11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1002\/bsl.444","article-title":"Current analysis of the Tarasoff duty: an evolution towards the limitation of the duty to protect","volume":"19","author":"Walcott","year":"2001","journal-title":"Behav Sci Law"},{"key":"2025092413350534000_47.4.213.12","unstructured":"Beauchamp TL , Childress JF . Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016:311\u201331."},{"key":"2025092413350534000_47.4.213.13","first-page":"369","article-title":"Of elephants and embryos: a proposed framework for legal personhood","volume":"59","author":"Berg","year":"2007","journal-title":"Hastings Law J"},{"key":"2025092413350534000_47.4.213.14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1001\/virtualmentor.2014.16.01.hlaw1-1401","article-title":"Physician duties in the face of deceitful gamete donors, disobedient surrogate mothers, and divorcing parents","volume":"16","author":"Daar","year":"2014","journal-title":"Virtual Mentor"},{"key":"2025092413350534000_47.4.213.15","unstructured":"American Medical Association. Code of medical ethics opinion 1.2.6: work-related & independent medical examinations. https:\/\/www.ama-assn.org\/delivering-care\/work-related-independent-medical-examinations (accessed Apr 2018)."},{"issue":"Suppl 2","key":"2025092413350534000_47.4.213.16","first-page":"S2","article-title":"A proposal to address NFL club doctors' conflicts of interest and to promote player trust","volume":"46","author":"Cohen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hastings Cent Rep"},{"key":"2025092413350534000_47.4.213.17","unstructured":"American Medical Association. Code of medical ethics opinion 3.2.3: industry-employed physicians & independent medical examiners. https:\/\/www.ama-assn.org\/delivering-care\/industry-employed-physicians-independent-medical-examiners (accessed Apr 2018)."}],"container-title":["Journal of Medical Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/medethics-2017-104518","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,24]],"date-time":"2025-09-24T20:35:15Z","timestamp":1758746115000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jme.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/medethics-2017-104518"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,13]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,13]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/medethics-2017-104518"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/medethics-2017-104518","relation":{},"ISSN":["0306-6800","1473-4257"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0306-6800"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1473-4257"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,13]]}}}