{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T14:44:30Z","timestamp":1787755470202,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"8","content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J NeuroIntervent Surg"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,20]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate the long term durability and outcomes of carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) compared with carotid endarterectomy (CEA).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>Using multiple comprehensive databases, we searched for randomized controlled trials comparing CAS with CEA for carotid stenosis. Studies were classified according to symptom status: symptomatic, asymptomatic, or all inclusive stenosis. Postprocedural ipsilateral stroke, restenosis\/occlusion after revascularization, procedural stroke\/death\/myocardial infarction (MI), and postprocedural ipsilateral stroke were evaluated. Subgroup analysis was performed according to follow-up duration.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>22 studies were included and classified for meta-analyses in relation to specific outcomes. The maximum follow-up duration was 10\u2005years. The risk of postprocedural ipsilateral stroke in CEA was equivalent to that in CAS, irrespective of symptom status or follow-up time points. The CAS group had a greater risk of restenosis\/occlusion after revascularization compared with CEA in studies of all inclusive stenosis. A similar tendency was found in studies of symptomatic stenosis, but without statistical significance. However, subgroup analysis showed that the risk of restenosis\/occlusion in CAS decreased gradually with time, to the extent that these risks became comparable 1\u2005year after the procedure. Procedural stroke\/death\/MI and postprocedural ipsilateral stroke occurred more frequently in the CAS group in studies of symptomatic stenosis although not in studies of asymptomatic or all inclusive stenosis. However, this association did not persist when studies were divided according to follow-up time points.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>Although CAS may be more strongly associated with periprocedural stroke\/death compared with CEA, it could be a good alternative to CEA in terms of long term durability and outcomes.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1136\/neurintsurg-2016-012293","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,12]],"date-time":"2016-07-12T07:02:26Z","timestamp":1468306946000},"page":"750-755","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Long term durability and outcomes of carotid stenting and carotid endarterectomy"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Jin-Man","family":"Jung","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jeong-Yoon","family":"Choi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hyun Jung","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sang-il","family":"Suh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Woo-Keun","family":"Seo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0708028"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.08.002","article-title":"Clinical, anatomic, and procedural durability of carotid revascularization","volume":"22","author":"Barrett","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archneurol.2010.262"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.avsg.2011.09.009"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1274","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2013.11.088","article-title":"Durability of eversion carotid endarterectomy","volume":"59","author":"Ballotta","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Vasc Surg"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bonati LH , Lyrer P , Ederle J , et al . Percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;(9):CD000515. doi:10.1002\/14651858.CD000515.pub4","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000515.pub4"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.114.005671"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61184-3"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1515706"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1505215"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/ijs.12624"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.110.589309"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.4414\/sanp.2008.01926","article-title":"Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy\u2014a prospective randomised controlled single-centre trial with long-term follow-up (BACASS)","volume":"159","author":"Hoffmann","year":"2008","journal-title":"Schweizer Archiv fur Neurologie und Psychiatrie"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0912321"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1474-4422(12)70159-X"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa061752"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1474-4422(08)70195-9"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.18","first-page":"985997","article-title":"Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial","volume":"375","author":"Ederle","year":"2010","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2013.09.010"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0735-1097(01)01595-9"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1227\/01.NEU.0000103447.30087.D3"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s001170050828"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2008.02.049"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040127"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00115-007-2353-6"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1474-4422(08)70196-0"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.27","first-page":"4","article-title":"Preliminary report of Trial of Endarterectomy versus Stenting for the Treatment of Carotid Atherosclerotic Stenosis in China (TESCAS-C)","volume":"3","author":"Ling","year":"2006","journal-title":"Chinese J Cerebrovasc Dis"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1161\/str.32.suppl_1.325-d","article-title":"Results of a multicenter prospective randomized trial of carotid artery stenting vs. carotid endarterectomy","volume":"32","author":"Alberts","year":"2011","journal-title":"Stroke"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMe1600123"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"709","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.25056","article-title":"An evidence-based review of the impact of periprocedural myocardial infarction in carotid revascularization","volume":"82","author":"Stilp","year":"2013","journal-title":"Catheter Cardiovasc Interv"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"558","DOI":"10.12659\/AJCR.894198","article-title":"Percutaneous treatment of recurrent in-stent restenosis of carotid artery stenting: A case report and state-of-the-art review","volume":"16","author":"Di Gioia","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Case Rep"},{"key":"2024052303074409000_9.8.750.32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1474-4422(08)70024-3"}],"container-title":["Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/neurintsurg-2016-012293","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,23]],"date-time":"2024-05-23T11:27:01Z","timestamp":1716463621000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jnis.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/neurintsurg-2016-012293"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,8]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,12]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/neurintsurg-2016-012293"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/neurintsurg-2016-012293","relation":{},"ISSN":["1759-8478","1759-8486"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1759-8478","type":"print"},{"value":"1759-8486","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,8]]}}}