{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,27]],"date-time":"2026-02-27T20:04:25Z","timestamp":1772222665955,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":11,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Occup Environ Med"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:p><jats:bold>Background:<\/jats:bold>Intervention development research is an essential prerequisite of any study that attempts to determine whether specific interventions work to prevent work related injury and illness.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Methods:<\/jats:bold>Focus groups (n\u200a=\u200a5) and direct observational studies (n\u200a=\u200a21) of printers were used to elicit key issues that would aid the development of subsequent interventions. Transcripts from these were analysed by standard qualitative methods to identify common and related themes.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results:<\/jats:bold>The views of managers differed significantly from those of print workers in a number of areas, and working practices did not always follow policy. The majority of printers did not perceive dermatitis to be a major problem, although many complained of dry hands. Other key results included: the lack of skin care policy in most companies; poor understanding of the nature, causes, and treatment of dermatitis; low priority of dermatitis within health and safety concerns; little or no provision of occupational health services, particularly skin checks; variability in provision of and access to appropriate skin protection; and lack of accessible washing facilities.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusions:<\/jats:bold>As a result it was decided to evaluate the implementation of four interventions: provision of (1) skin checks and treatment advice; (2) gloves of the correct type and size, and use of an after-work cream; (3) information on dermatitis within the printing industry; and (4) development of best practice skin care policy.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1136\/oem.2005.023523","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2006,3,23]],"date-time":"2006-03-23T17:28:51Z","timestamp":1143134931000},"page":"261-266","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Intervention development in occupational research: an example from the printing industry"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"63","author":[{"given":"T P","family":"Brown","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"L","family":"Rushton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"H C","family":"Williams","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J S C","family":"English","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2006,3,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"2024052223093596000_63.4.261.1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/oem.2004.016097"},{"key":"2024052223093596000_63.4.261.2","first-page":"763","volume":"36","year":"1994","journal-title":"J Occup Med"},{"key":"2024052223093596000_63.4.261.3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"616","DOI":"10.1097\/00043764-200107000-00008","volume":"43","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Occup Environ Med"},{"key":"2024052223093596000_63.4.261.4","unstructured":"Robson LS, Shannon HS, Goldenhar LM, et al. Guide to evaluating the effectiveness of strategies for preventing work injuries: how to show whether a safety intervention really works. 2001-119. Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2001."},{"key":"2024052223093596000_63.4.261.5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/occmed\/50.7.496"},{"key":"2024052223093596000_63.4.261.6","unstructured":"Jones JR, Huxtable CS, Hodgson JT, et al. Self-reported work-related illness in 2001\/02: results from a household survey. SW10102. London: Health and Safety Executive, 2003."},{"key":"2024052223093596000_63.4.261.7","unstructured":"HSE. Health and safety statistics highlight 2001\/02. Bootle, UK: Health & Safety Executive, 2002:1\u00e2\u0080\u009332."},{"key":"2024052223093596000_63.4.261.8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/oem.59.7.487"},{"key":"2024052223093596000_63.4.261.9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/occmed\/50.4.265"},{"key":"2024052223093596000_63.4.261.10","unstructured":"Pope C, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care, 2nd edn. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2000."},{"key":"2024052223093596000_63.4.261.11","unstructured":"Brown TP, Rushton L, Williams HC, et al. Intervention implementation research: an exploratory study of reduction strategies for occupational contact dermatitis in the printing industry. Contact Dermatitis, submitted."}],"container-title":["Occupational and Environmental Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/oem.2005.023523","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,23]],"date-time":"2024-05-23T07:19:02Z","timestamp":1716448742000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/oem.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/oem.2005.023523"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2006,3,23]]},"references-count":11,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2006,3,23]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/oem.2005.023523"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/oem.2005.023523","relation":{},"ISSN":["1351-0711","1470-7926"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1351-0711","type":"print"},{"value":"1470-7926","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2006,3,23]]}}}