{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,25]],"date-time":"2026-08-25T12:18:16Z","timestamp":1787660296071,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"BMJ","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,21]],"date-time":"2026-07-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1784592000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Reg Anesth Pain Med"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Peripheral nerve blockade is a common analgesic technique in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The comparative opioid-sparing and functional outcomes of continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB) versus continuous adductor canal block (CACB) are unclear.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this single-center, double-blind, prospective, superiority randomized controlled trial, 60 adults undergoing ACL reconstruction were randomized to receive either CFNB or CACB. All patients received a 20\u2009mL loading dose of 0.5% ropivacaine and were discharged with a 0.2% ropivacaine infusion (5\u2009mL\/hour basal, 5\u2009mL demand bolus, 30\u2009min lockout). The primary outcome was average numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores analyzed using a linear mixed-effects repeated-measures model over 48 hours. Secondary outcomes included cumulative morphine milligram equivalents (MME), continuous passive motion (CPM) usage, CPM compliance, and Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      57 patients completed the study (CFNB n=28; CACB n=29). Mixed-effects repeated-measures analysis of average NRS pain scores at 24 and 48 hours showed no significant difference between CFNB and CACB. The estimated overall treatment effect for CFNB versus CACB was \u22120.31 NRS points (p=0.58, 95% CI \u22121.39 to 0.77), with no significant treatment-by-time interaction (p=0.97). Current NRS pain scores were lower for CFNB on postoperative day 0 (POD0) (p\n                      <jats:italic>=<\/jats:italic>\n                      0.02, 95%\u2009CI 6.44\u00d710\n                      <jats:sup>\u20136<\/jats:sup>\n                      to 2.00). In an exploratory analysis, fewer CFNB patients required more than 50 MME during the 48-hour follow-up period compared with CACB (CFNB: 5\/28 vs CACB: 13\/29; p\n                      <jats:italic>=<\/jats:italic>\n                      0.045, 95%\u2009CI 0.08 to 0.93). The absolute risk difference was 0.27 (95% CI \u22120.08 to 0.54). There were no differences in CPM use or compliance, bolus volume, or QoR-15.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>CFNB was not superior to CACB on the primary pain outcome over 48 hours. In secondary analysis, CFNB catheters were associated with lower immediate postoperative pain. In exploratory analyses, fewer patients required more than 50 MME over 48 hours. This finding is hypothesis-generating and requires confirmation in an adequately powered trial. There were no differences in quality of recovery or CPM compliance. Whether any opioid-related differences between techniques outweigh concerns about motor blockade warrants further investigation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Trial registration number<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" ext-link-type=\"clintrialgov\" xlink:href=\"NCT03208478\">NCT03208478<\/jats:ext-link>\n                      .\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1136\/rapm-2026-107940","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,21]],"date-time":"2026-07-21T13:30:20Z","timestamp":1784640620000},"page":"rapm-2026-107940","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Continuous femoral nerve blocks versus adductor canal blocks for anterior cruciate ligament surgery: a double-blind, superiority randomized controlled trial"],"prefix":"10.1136","clinical-trial-number":[{"clinical-trial-number":"nct03208478","registry":"10.18810\/clinical-trials-gov"},{"clinical-trial-number":"nct03208478","registry":"10.18810\/clinical-trials-gov"}],"author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0006-6137-2459","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Justin Christopher","family":"Chen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Hong Kong Faculty of Medicine, Hong Kong, Hong Kong"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Claudia Florez","family":"Denoue","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Audrey","family":"Horn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ksenia","family":"Kasimova","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zackary","family":"Vaughn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0631-7562","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jean-Louis","family":"Horn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.L.01705"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.2","first-page":"157","article-title":"Postoperative complications of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after ambulatory surgery","volume":"59","author":"Andr\u00e9s-Cano","year":"2015","journal-title":"Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546516629944"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546515617737"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000029295","article-title":"Comparison of adductor canal block and femoral nerve block for pain management in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"101","author":"Yin","year":"2022","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1053","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0000000000001045","article-title":"Adductor Canal Block Provides Noninferior Analgesia and Superior Quadriceps Strength Compared with Femoral Nerve Block in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction","volume":"124","author":"Abdallah","year":"2016","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"921","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2018.10.149","article-title":"Adductor Canal Nerve Versus Femoral Nerve Blockade for Pain Control and Quadriceps Function Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Patellar Tendon Autograft: A Prospective Randomized Trial","volume":"35","author":"Bailey","year":"2019","journal-title":"Arthroscopy"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.4103\/joacp.JOACP_172_17","article-title":"Ultrasound-guided adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament repair under general anesthesia","volume":"34","author":"Ghodki","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.4103\/1658-354X.154708","article-title":"Femoral nerve block versus adductor canal block for postoperative pain control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized controlled double blind study","volume":"9","author":"El Ahl","year":"2015","journal-title":"Saudi J Anaesth"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm12186019","article-title":"The Effectiveness of Adductor Canal Block Compared to Femoral Nerve Block on Readiness for Discharge in Patients Undergoing Outpatient Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Multi-Center Randomized Clinical Trial","volume":"12","author":"Ten Hoope","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.11","first-page":"323","article-title":"Femoral Nerve Block after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction","volume":"30","author":"Magnussen","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Knee Surg"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3390\/healthcare11020210","article-title":"Motor-Sparing Effect of Adductor Canal Block for Knee Analgesia: An Updated Review and a Subgroup Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Based on a Corrected Classification System","volume":"11","author":"Fan Chiang","year":"2023","journal-title":"Healthcare (Basel)"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AAP.0000000000000015"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000030110","article-title":"Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for pain control after total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and Meta-analysis","volume":"101","author":"Hasabo","year":"2022","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e121","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asmr.2020.01.001","article-title":"Comparison of Continuous Adductor Canal and Femoral Nerve Blocks for Analgesia and Return of Quadriceps Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients","volume":"2","author":"Holland","year":"2020","journal-title":"Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.15585\/mmwr.rr7103a1","article-title":"CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain - United States, 2022","volume":"71","author":"Dowell","year":"2022","journal-title":"MMWR Recomm Rep"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/dyz032"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<873::AID-SIM779>3.0.CO;2-I"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1016\/j.aanat.2019.05.010","article-title":"Neurological structures and mediators of pain sensation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction","volume":"225","author":"Hong","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann Anat"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AAP.0000000000000389"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-005-0679-9"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/036354658201000601"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"404","DOI":"10.1016\/0749-8063(95)90191-4","article-title":"Femoral nerve block as an alternative to parenteral narcotics for pain control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction","volume":"11","author":"Edkin","year":"1995","journal-title":"Arthroscopy"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2010.02333.x"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40721","DOI":"10.1038\/srep40721","article-title":"Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"7","author":"Wang","year":"2017","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.26","article-title":"Adductor canal blocks for postoperative pain treatment in adults undergoing knee surgery","volume":"2019","author":"Schnabel","year":"2019","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000013391","article-title":"A comparison of adductor canal block and femoral nerve block after total-knee arthroplasty regarding analgesic effect, effectiveness of early rehabilitation, and lateral knee pain relief in the early stage","volume":"97","author":"Tan","year":"2018","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000017358","article-title":"Continuous femoral nerve block is more effective than continuous adductor canal block for treating pain after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial","volume":"98","author":"Borys","year":"2019","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1097\/AJP.0000000000001214","article-title":"Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Network Meta-Analysis","volume":"40","author":"Berikashvili","year":"2024","journal-title":"Clin J Pain"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0000000000000741"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-200611000-00022"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/rapm-2018-000002"},{"key":"2026082504200822000_rapm-2026-107940v2.33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/rapm-2019-101091"}],"container-title":["Regional Anesthesia &amp; Pain Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/rapm-2026-107940","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,25]],"date-time":"2026-08-25T11:20:13Z","timestamp":1787656813000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/rapm.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/rapm-2026-107940"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,21]]},"references-count":33,"alternative-id":["10.1136\/rapm-2026-107940"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/rapm-2026-107940","relation":{},"ISSN":["1098-7339","1532-8651"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1098-7339","type":"print"},{"value":"1532-8651","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,21]]}}}