{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,17]],"date-time":"2026-03-17T00:44:59Z","timestamp":1773708299524,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,7,30]],"date-time":"2005-07-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1122681600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":29,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Veterinary Record"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>\n                    Nine groups of four 18\u2010 to 24\u2010month\u2010old rams were inoculated with\n                    <jats:italic>Actinobacillus seminis<\/jats:italic>\n                    by the following routes: intraconjunctival, intranasal, oral, intravenous, intramuscular, intraepididymal, vas deferens, intraurethral or intrapreputial. Eight similar rams were left uninoculated as controls. Systemic clinical signs were minimal and were confined primarily to the inoculation sites and the scrotal contents. Mild to severe epididymitis resulted from all the routes of inoculation except intraconjunctival and intranasal. Direct inoculation into the genital tract, especially into the cauda epididymis, was more effective. Intrapreputial and intraurethral inoculation led to ascending urethral infection, and inoculation into the vas deferens resulted primarily in descending infection of the accessory sex glands.\n                    <jats:italic>A seminis<\/jats:italic>\n                    was isolated from 11 of the 36 test rams (30\u00b76 per cent); 26 of the 36 rams, some from each of the test groups except those inoculated intravenously, reacted serologically.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1136\/vr.157.5.143","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,10,23]],"date-time":"2014-10-23T13:01:21Z","timestamp":1414069281000},"page":"143-147","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Experimental transmission of\n                    <i>Actinobacillus seminis<\/i>\n                    infection to rams"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"157","author":[{"given":"W. A.","family":"Al\u2010Katib","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"London Regional Cancer Centre 790 Commissioners Road East London Ontario Canada N6A 4L6"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"S. M.","family":"Dennis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Diagnostic Medicine\/Pathobiology Kansas State University 1800 Denison Avenue Manhattan KS 66506 USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2005,7,30]]},"container-title":["Veterinary Record"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1136%2Fvr.157.5.143","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/bvajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1136\/vr.157.5.143","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,28]],"date-time":"2025-10-28T11:34:39Z","timestamp":1761651279000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bvajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1136\/vr.157.5.143"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2005,7]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/vr.157.5.143"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/vr.157.5.143","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0042-4900","2042-7670"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0042-4900","type":"print"},{"value":"2042-7670","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2005,7]]}}}