{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,4]],"date-time":"2022-04-04T21:29:37Z","timestamp":1649107777567},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"26","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Veterinary Record"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1950,7,1]]},"DOI":"10.1136\/vr.62.26.381","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,10,4]],"date-time":"2010-10-04T23:18:27Z","timestamp":1286234307000},"page":"381-382","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["A comparison of the efficacy of sulphamezathine (sulphadimethyl-pyrimidine) and sulphaquinoxaline in the control of experimentally induced caecal coccidiosis in chicks"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"62","author":[{"given":"S.","family":"KENDALL","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","container-title":["Veterinary Record"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/vr.62.26.381","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,10]],"date-time":"2021-02-10T19:35:33Z","timestamp":1612985733000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/veterinaryrecord.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/vr.62.26.381"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1950,7,1]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"26","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1950,7,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/vr.62.26.381","relation":{},"ISSN":["0042-4900","2042-7670"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0042-4900","type":"print"},{"value":"2042-7670","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1950,7,1]]}}}