{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,3]],"date-time":"2024-06-03T22:39:39Z","timestamp":1717454379752},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt","issue":"01","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int. Game Theory Rev."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:p> When Herrero (1985) extends Rubinstein's (1982) alternating-offers bargaining model to the case of three or more players any agreement can be supported as a subgame perfect equilibrium (SPE) outcome, given a sufficiently large discount factor. We show that this is not the case when players demand shares for themselves instead of proposing agreements to each other. Although it is possible to rule out agreements, the majority remains to be SPE outcomes. <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1142\/s0219198909002170","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,7,31]],"date-time":"2009-07-31T11:52:17Z","timestamp":1249041137000},"page":"111-115","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["AN n-PERSON RUBINSTEIN BARGAINING GAME"],"prefix":"10.1142","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"P\u00c4R","family":"TORSTENSSON","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"SVERIGES RIKSBANK, Policy and Analysis Division, Financial Stability Department, SE-103 37, Stockholm, Sweden"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"219","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"rf1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0899-8256(92)90013-I"},{"key":"rf2","first-page":"1","volume":"3","author":"Baliga S.","journal-title":"Economics Bulletin"},{"key":"rf4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s001990200330"},{"key":"rf5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0165-1765(99)00136-6"},{"key":"rf6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0165-1765(88)90118-8"},{"key":"rf7","first-page":"255","volume":"3","author":"Chae S.","journal-title":"Seoul Journal of Economics"},{"key":"rf8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1006\/jeth.1994.1005"},{"key":"rf9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-0262.00169"},{"key":"rf10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0165-1765(86)90134-5"},{"key":"rf12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s001990100192"},{"key":"rf14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2298115"},{"key":"rf15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2951630"},{"key":"rf16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/1912531"},{"key":"rf18","first-page":"61","volume":"41","author":"Suh S.-C.","journal-title":"Journal of Mathematical Economics"},{"key":"rf19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2297715"},{"key":"rf20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s001990050298"},{"key":"rf21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0165-1765(92)90070-F"}],"container-title":["International Game Theory Review"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.worldscientific.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1142\/S0219198909002170","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,6]],"date-time":"2019-08-06T21:58:03Z","timestamp":1565128683000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.worldscientific.com\/doi\/abs\/10.1142\/S0219198909002170"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,3]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"01","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,20]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1142\/S0219198909002170"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1142\/s0219198909002170","relation":{},"ISSN":["0219-1989","1793-6675"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0219-1989","type":"print"},{"value":"1793-6675","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,3]]}}}