{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,19]],"date-time":"2025-06-19T04:41:44Z","timestamp":1750308104447,"version":"3.41.0"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,5,17]],"date-time":"2005-05-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1116288000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>\n            In this paper, we review four examples in software engineering practice of the lack of use of empirical evidence. We use these examples to support our claims that practitioners and researchers appear to have different values with regards to empirical evidence, and appear to use different criteria when evaluating the credibility of evidence. From our examples, it seems that practitioners need to be\n            <jats:italic>persuaded<\/jats:italic>\n            to adopt evidence-based software engineering practices. Consequently, the research community needs to consider strategies for persuading practitioners. Paradoxically for software engineering research, the more effective persuasion strategies may be ones that, initially at least, do not rely on empirical evidence.\n          <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1145\/1082983.1083177","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2005,11,7]],"date-time":"2005-11-07T19:28:32Z","timestamp":1131391712000},"page":"1-5","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Software engineering practice versus evidence-based software engineering research"],"prefix":"10.1145","volume":"30","author":[{"given":"Austen","family":"Rainer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dorota","family":"Jagielska","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tracy","family":"Hall","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2005,5,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_1_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/32.6156"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","unstructured":"Bhattacherjee A. and Sanford C. Persuasion strategies for information technology usage: an elaboration likelihood model. MIS Quarterly In review.   Bhattacherjee A. and Sanford C. Persuasion strategies for information technology usage: an elaboration likelihood model. MIS Quarterly In review."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","unstructured":"DTI DTI's Office of Science and Technology's Public Engagement with Science and Technology Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) http:\/\/www.dti.gov.uk\/ost\/ostbusiness\/puset\/puset.htm 18th February 2005 2005  DTI DTI's Office of Science and Technology's Public Engagement with Science and Technology Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) http:\/\/www.dti.gov.uk\/ost\/ostbusiness\/puset\/puset.htm 18th February 2005 2005"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/MS.2005.6"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/32.879815"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","volume-title":"The Logic of Real Arguments","author":"Fisher A.","year":"1988","unstructured":"Fisher , A. The Logic of Real Arguments . Cambridge University Press , 1988 . Fisher, A. The Logic of Real Arguments. Cambridge University Press, 1988."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.2002.1027796"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","volume-title":"Allyn and Bacon","author":"McCroskey J. C.","year":"1997","unstructured":"McCroskey , J. C. An introduction to rhetorical communication . Allyn and Bacon , Boston , 1997 . McCroskey, J. C. An introduction to rhetorical communication. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 1997."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/52.219617"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.21236\/ADA377375"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_1","volume-title":"Communication and attitudes in the 21st Century","author":"Perloff The","year":"2003","unstructured":"Perloff The dynamics of persuasion : Communication and attitudes in the 21st Century . Lawrence Erlbaum Associates , Mahwah, N.J. , 2003 . Perloff The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st Century. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J., 2003."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_1","volume-title":"The elaboration liklehood model of persuasion. Advances in experimental social psychology, 19","author":"Petty R. E.","year":"1986","unstructured":"Petty , R. E. and Cacioppo , J. T . The elaboration liklehood model of persuasion. Advances in experimental social psychology, 19 , 1986 . Petty, R. E. and Cacioppo, J. T. The elaboration liklehood model of persuasion. Advances in experimental social psychology, 19, 1986."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_1","volume-title":"To think or not to think: exploring two routes to persuasion","author":"Petty R. E.","year":"1994","unstructured":"Petty , R. E. , Cacioppo , J. T. , Strathman , A. J. and Priester , J. R . To think or not to think: exploring two routes to persuasion . In Shavitt, S. and Brock, T. C. eds. Persuasion: psychological insight and perspectives, 1994 . Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., Strathman, A. J. and Priester, J. R. To think or not to think: exploring two routes to persuasion. In Shavitt, S. and Brock, T. C. eds. Persuasion: psychological insight and perspectives, 1994."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_1","volume-title":"Dua-process theories in social psychology","author":"Petty R. E.","year":"1999","unstructured":"Petty , R. E. and Wegener , D. T . The elaboration liklihood model: current status and controversies . In Chaiken, S. and Trope, Y. eds. Dua-process theories in social psychology , The Guildford Press , New York , 1999 , 41--72. Petty, R. E. and Wegener, D. T. The elaboration liklihood model: current status and controversies. In Chaiken, S. and Trope, Y. eds. Dua-process theories in social psychology, The Guildford Press, New York, 1999, 41--72."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5555\/1018439.1021902"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_17_1","volume-title":"ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE), (University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Italy, September 30th - October 1st 2003","author":"Rainer A. W.","year":"2003","unstructured":"Rainer , A. W. , Hall , T. and Baddoo , N ., Persuading developers to 'buy into' software process improvement: an exploratory analysis . In ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE), (University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Italy, September 30th - October 1st 2003 , 2003 ). Rainer, A. W., Hall, T. and Baddoo, N., Persuading developers to 'buy into' software process improvement: an exploratory analysis. In ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE), (University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Italy, September 30th - October 1st 2003, 2003)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_18_1","volume-title":"Diffusion of innovations","author":"Rogers E. M.","year":"1995","unstructured":"Rogers , E. M. Diffusion of innovations . Free Press , New York , 1995 . Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York, 1995."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/1022494.1022546"}],"container-title":["ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/1082983.1083177","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/1082983.1083177","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T16:08:05Z","timestamp":1750262885000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/1082983.1083177"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2005,5,17]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1145\/1082983.1083177"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1082983.1083177","relation":{"is-identical-to":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1145\/1083174.1083177","asserted-by":"subject"}]},"ISSN":["0163-5948"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0163-5948"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2005,5,17]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2005-05-17","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}