{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,2]],"date-time":"2026-06-02T13:58:48Z","timestamp":1780408728753,"version":"3.54.1"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":22,"publisher":"ACM","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,6,6]],"date-time":"2005-06-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1118016000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,6,6]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/1165485.1165503","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2006,10,18]],"date-time":"2006-10-18T22:04:00Z","timestamp":1161209040000},"page":"115-124","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":39,"title":["Dialogues about the burden of proof"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"given":"Henry","family":"Prakken","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Groningen, The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chris","family":"Reed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Douglas","family":"Walton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2005,6,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_1_1","volume-title":"CSLI Publications","author":"Barwise J.","year":"1996","unstructured":"J. Barwise and L. Moss . Vicious Circles. Number 60 in CSLI Lecture Notes . CSLI Publications , Stanford, CA , 1996 .]] J. Barwise and L. Moss. Vicious Circles. Number 60 in CSLI Lecture Notes. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, 1996.]]"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008308627745"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_3_1","first-page":"119","volume-title":"Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2004: The Seventeenth Annual Conference","author":"Bex F. J.","year":"2004","unstructured":"F. J. Bex and H. Prakken . Reinterpreting arguments in dialogue: an application to evidential reasoning . In Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2004: The Seventeenth Annual Conference , pages 119 -- 129 , Amsterdam etc , 2004 . IOS Press.]] F. J. Bex and H. Prakken. Reinterpreting arguments in dialogue: an application to evidential reasoning. In Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2004: The Seventeenth Annual Conference, pages 119--129, Amsterdam etc, 2004. IOS Press.]]"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1023\/B:ARTI.0000046007.11806.9a"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_5_1","volume-title":"The Pleadings Game. An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice","author":"Gordon T. F.","year":"1995","unstructured":"T. F. Gordon . The Pleadings Game. An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice . Kluwer Academic Publishers , Dordrecht\/Boston\/ London , 1995 .]] T. F. Gordon. The Pleadings Game. An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht\/Boston\/London, 1995.]]"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/1047788.1047792"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/383535.383549"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-011-3957-1","volume-title":"On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation","author":"Lodder A. R.","year":"1999","unstructured":"A. R. Lodder . DiaLaw. On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation . Law and Philosophy Library. Kluwer Academic Publishers , Dordrecht\/Boston\/London, 1999 .]] A. R. Lodder. DiaLaw. On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation. Law and Philosophy Library. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht\/Boston\/London, 1999.]]"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00872529"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00258422"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/1887.001.0001","volume-title":"A Blueprint for How to Build a Person","author":"Pollock J. L.","year":"1995","unstructured":"J. L. Pollock . Cognitive Carpentry . A Blueprint for How to Build a Person . MIT Press , Cambridge, MA , 1995 .]] J. L. Pollock. Cognitive Carpentry. A Blueprint for How to Build a Person. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.]]"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_12_1","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 7th European Workshop on Logic for Artificial Intelligence (JELIA '2000)","author":"Prakken H.","year":"1919","unstructured":"H. Prakken . On dialogue systems with speech acts, arguments, and counterarguments . In Proceedings of the 7th European Workshop on Logic for Artificial Intelligence (JELIA '2000) , number 1919 in Springer Lecture Notes in AI, pages 224--238, Berlin , 2000. Springer Verlag.]] H. Prakken. On dialogue systems with speech acts, arguments, and counterarguments. In Proceedings of the 7th European Workshop on Logic for Artificial Intelligence (JELIA '2000), number 1919 in Springer Lecture Notes in AI, pages 224--238, Berlin, 2000. Springer Verlag.]]"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/383535.383550"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_14_1","volume-title":"Coherence and flexibility in two-person dialogue games for argumentation. Technical report","author":"Prakken H.","year":"2005","unstructured":"H. Prakken . Coherence and flexibility in two-person dialogue games for argumentation. Technical report , Institute of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University , Utrecht , 2005 .]] H. Prakken. Coherence and flexibility in two-person dialogue games for argumentation. Technical report, Institute of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 2005.]]"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_15_1","first-page":"81","volume-title":"Proceedings of the ECAI-2004 Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument","author":"Prakken H.","year":"2004","unstructured":"H. Prakken , C. Reed , and D. N. Walton . Argumentation schemes and burden of proof . In Proceedings of the ECAI-2004 Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument , pages 81 -- 86 , 2004 .]] H. Prakken, C. Reed, and D. N. Walton. Argumentation schemes and burden of proof. In Proceedings of the ECAI-2004 Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument, pages 81--86, 2004.]]"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-8531-6_4","volume-title":"Informatics and the Foundations of Legal Reasoning","author":"Sartor G.","year":"1995","unstructured":"G. Sartor . Defeasibility in legal reasoning . In Z. Bankowski, I. White, and U. Hahn, editors, Informatics and the Foundations of Legal Reasoning , Law and Philosophy Library, pages 119 -- 157 . Kluwer Academic Publishers , Dordrecht\/Boston\/London, 1995 .]] G. Sartor. Defeasibility in legal reasoning. In Z. Bankowski, I. White, and U. Hahn, editors, Informatics and the Foundations of Legal Reasoning, Law and Philosophy Library, pages 119--157. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht\/Boston\/London, 1995.]]"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1023\/B:ARTI.0000046008.49443.36"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(96)00041-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_19_1","volume-title":"Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning","author":"Walton D. N.","year":"1996","unstructured":"D. N. Walton . Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning . Lawrence Erlbaum Associates , Mahwah, NJ , 1996 .]] D. N. Walton. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1996.]]"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_20_1","volume-title":"Appeal to Expert Opinion","author":"Walton D. N.","year":"1997","unstructured":"D. N. Walton . Appeal to Expert Opinion . Penn State Press , University Press , 1997 .]] D. N. Walton. Appeal to Expert Opinion. Penn State Press, University Press, 1997.]]"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1023\/B:ARTI.0000013333.96215.a9"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_22_1","volume-title":"Commitment in Dialogue. Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning","author":"Walton D. N.","year":"1995","unstructured":"D. N. Walton and E. C. W. Krabbe . Commitment in Dialogue. Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning . State University of New York Press , Albany, NY , 1995 .]] D. N. Walton and E. C. W. Krabbe. Commitment in Dialogue. Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 1995.]]"}],"event":{"name":"ICAIL05: 10th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intellignece and Law","location":"Bologna Italy","acronym":"ICAIL05","sponsor":["The International Association for Artificial Intelligence and Law","CIRSFID"]},"container-title":["Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/1165485.1165503","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/1165485.1165503","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T21:37:05Z","timestamp":1750282625000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/1165485.1165503"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2005,6,6]]},"references-count":22,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/1165485.1165503","10.1145\/1165485"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1165485.1165503","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2005,6,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2005-06-06","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}