{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,19]],"date-time":"2025-06-19T04:33:34Z","timestamp":1750307614514,"version":"3.41.0"},"reference-count":10,"publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,12,31]],"date-time":"2008-12-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1230681600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,12,31]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The current Internet fairness paradigm mandates that all protocols have equivalent response to packet loss and other congestion signals, allowing relatively simple network devices to attain a weak form of fairness by sending uniform signals to all ows. Our paper[1], which recently received the ACM SIGCOMM Test of Time Award, modeled the reference Additive-Increase-Multiplicative-Decrease algorithm used by TCP. However, in many parts of the Internet ISPs are choosing to explicitly control customer traffic, because the traditional paradigm does not sufficiently enforce fair- ness in a number of increasingly common situations. This editorial note takes the position we should embrace this paradigm shift, which will eventually move the responsibility for capacity allocation from the end-systems to the network itself. This paradigm shift might eventually eliminate the requirement that all protocols be TCP-Friendly\".<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1145\/1496091.1496099","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,1,20]],"date-time":"2009-01-20T14:41:13Z","timestamp":1232462473000},"page":"47-49","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Reflections on the TCP macroscopic model"],"prefix":"10.1145","volume":"39","author":[{"given":"Matthew","family":"Mathis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2008,12,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_1_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/263932.264023"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","unstructured":"J. Mahdavi and S. Floyd. TCP-friendly unicast rate-based ow control Jan 1997. Note sent to end2end-interest mailing list.  J. Mahdavi and S. Floyd. TCP-friendly unicast rate-based ow control Jan 1997. Note sent to end2end-interest mailing list."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/90.793002"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/75246.75248"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/956981.956985"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"B. Braden et al. Recommendations on queue management and congestion avoidance in the internet RFC 2309 April 1998.   B. Braden et al. Recommendations on queue management and congestion avoidance in the internet RFC 2309 April 1998.","DOI":"10.17487\/rfc2309"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/TNET.2003.815297"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","unstructured":"Tom Kelly Sally Floyd and Scott Shenker. Patterns of congestion collapse 2003.  Tom Kelly Sally Floyd and Scott Shenker. Patterns of congestion collapse 2003."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","unstructured":"B. Briscoe A. Jacquet T. Moncaster and A. Smith. Re-ECN: Adding accountability for causing congestion to TCP\/IP July 2008. Work in progress.  B. Briscoe A. Jacquet T. Moncaster and A. Smith. Re-ECN: Adding accountability for causing congestion to TCP\/IP July 2008. Work in progress."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","unstructured":"M. Mathis. Heresy following TCP: Train-wreck April 2008. Note sent to the ICCRG mailing list.  M. Mathis. Heresy following TCP: Train-wreck April 2008. Note sent to the ICCRG mailing list."}],"container-title":["ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/1496091.1496099","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/1496091.1496099","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T12:45:43Z","timestamp":1750250743000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/1496091.1496099"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008,12,31]]},"references-count":10,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,12,31]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1145\/1496091.1496099"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1496091.1496099","relation":{},"ISSN":["0146-4833"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0146-4833"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008,12,31]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2008-12-31","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}