{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,19]],"date-time":"2025-06-19T04:31:42Z","timestamp":1750307502342,"version":"3.41.0"},"reference-count":2,"publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2009,6,30]],"date-time":"2009-06-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1246320000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,6,30]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>As the community develops an ever more diverse set of venues for disseminating and discussing technical work and as the traditional resource constraints change from pages and shelf space to reviewer time, the traditional prohibition against double submission deserves closer consideration. We discuss reasons why double submissions have been frowned upon, and try to establish a set of guidelines that ensure appropriate review and dissemination, without preventing informal early discussion of research projects.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1145\/1568613.1568622","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,7,15]],"date-time":"2009-07-15T13:51:27Z","timestamp":1247665887000},"page":"40-42","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Double submissions"],"prefix":"10.1145","volume":"39","author":[{"given":"Henning","family":"Schulzrinne","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Columbia University, New York, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2009,6,30]]},"reference":[{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_1_1_1","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00872316"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","DOI":"10.1109\/MAP.2003.1241310"}],"container-title":["ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/1568613.1568622","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/1568613.1568622","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T12:17:48Z","timestamp":1750249068000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/1568613.1568622"}},"subtitle":["publishing misconduct or just effective dissemination?"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,6,30]]},"references-count":2,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,6,30]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1145\/1568613.1568622"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1568613.1568622","relation":{},"ISSN":["0146-4833"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0146-4833"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,6,30]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2009-06-30","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}