{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,19]],"date-time":"2025-06-19T04:30:25Z","timestamp":1750307425524,"version":"3.41.0"},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,10,22]],"date-time":"2010-10-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1287705600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,10,22]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Software engineering, as an engineering discipline, is still quite young as compared to other engineering disciplines. The software engineering research community has made enormous contributions in past decades to lay down its foundations. However, the research methodologies in software engineering are still not mature. One of the reasons in this regard is the inherent complexity of this field. In this paper, we focus on one aspect of this field -- the evaluation of reusability assessment approaches. We begin by reviewing existing ways of comparing reusability assessment approaches. Following this we propose a different approach. This includes a mixture of both subjective and objective evaluation of a reusability assessment approach. This is novel in that we feel that subjective evaluation has been neglected by other approaches.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1145\/1838687.1838703","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,10,26]],"date-time":"2010-10-26T12:36:02Z","timestamp":1288096562000},"page":"1-4","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Proposal for evaluation of software reusability assessment approach employing a mixed method"],"prefix":"10.1145","volume":"35","author":[{"family":"Fazal-e-Amin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar, 31750 Tronoh, Perak, Malaysia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ahmad Kamil","family":"Mahmood","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar, 31750 Tronoh, Perak, Malaysia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alan","family":"Oxley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar, 31750 Tronoh, Perak, Malaysia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,10,22]]},"reference":[{"volume-title":"Information Reuse and Integration, 2004. IRI 2004. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on, 210--214","author":"Burgin M.","key":"e_1_2_1_1_1","unstructured":"Burgin , M. , Lee , H.K. and Debnath , N . 2004. Software technological roles, usability, and reusability . In Information Reuse and Integration, 2004. IRI 2004. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on, 210--214 . Burgin, M., Lee, H.K. and Debnath, N. 2004. Software technological roles, usability, and reusability. In Information Reuse and Integration, 2004. IRI 2004. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on, 210--214."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Easterbrook S. Singer J. Storey M.-A. and Damian D. 2008. Selecting Empirical Methods for Software Engineering Research. In Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering 285--311.  Easterbrook S. Singer J. Storey M.-A. and Damian D. 2008. Selecting Empirical Methods for Software Engineering Research. In Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering 285--311.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-84800-044-5_11"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","unstructured":"Goul\u00e3o M. and Abreu F.B. 2004. Software Components Evaluation: an Overview. In 5th Confer\u00eancia da APSI Lisbon.  Goul\u00e3o M. and Abreu F.B. 2004. Software Components Evaluation: an Overview. In 5th Confer\u00eancia da APSI Lisbon."},{"volume-title":"Doing Research in the Real World","author":"Gray D.E.","key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","unstructured":"Gray , D.E. 2009. Doing Research in the Real World . SAGE Publication Ltd . Gray, D.E. 2009. Doing Research in the Real World. SAGE Publication Ltd."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3102\/01623737011003255"},{"volume-title":"IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology","key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","unstructured":"IEEE 1990. IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology , NY , USA. IEEE 1990. IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology, NY, USA."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5555\/1485203.1485205"},{"volume-title":"2nd International Workshop on Philosophical Foundations of Information Systems Engineering (PHISE'06)","author":"Lazaro M.","key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","unstructured":"Lazaro , M. and Marcos , E . 2006. An Approach to the Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods in Software Engineering Research . In 2nd International Workshop on Philosophical Foundations of Information Systems Engineering (PHISE'06) LNCS. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Lazaro, M. and Marcos, E. 2006. An Approach to the Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods in Software Engineering Research. In 2nd International Workshop on Philosophical Foundations of Information Systems Engineering (PHISE'06) LNCS. Springer-Verlag, Berlin."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","unstructured":"Lincke R. and Lowe W. 2007. Compendium of Software Quality Standards and Metrics - Version 1.0.  Lincke R. and Lowe W. 2007. Compendium of Software Quality Standards and Metrics - Version 1.0."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mandi\u0107 V. Markkula J. and Oivo M. 2009. Towards Multi-Method Research Approach in Empirical Software Engineering. In Product-Focused Software Process Improvement 96--110.  Mandi\u0107 V. Markkula J. and Oivo M. 2009. Towards Multi-Method Research Approach in Empirical Software Engineering. In Product-Focused Software Process Improvement 96--110.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-02152-7_9"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1287\/isre.12.3.240.9709"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/32.799955"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10009-002-0083-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_1","unstructured":"Tashakkori A. and Teddlie C. 1998. Mixed Methodology Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. SAGE Publications Inc.  Tashakkori A. and Teddlie C. 1998. Mixed Methodology Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. SAGE Publications Inc."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0164-1212(99)00042-4"}],"container-title":["ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/1838687.1838703","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/1838687.1838703","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T11:39:48Z","timestamp":1750246788000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/1838687.1838703"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,10,22]]},"references-count":15,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,10,22]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1145\/1838687.1838703"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1838687.1838703","relation":{},"ISSN":["0163-5948"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0163-5948"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,10,22]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2010-10-22","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}