{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,19]],"date-time":"2025-06-19T04:26:53Z","timestamp":1750307213358,"version":"3.41.0"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,21]],"date-time":"2011-12-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1324425600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,21]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>In order to effectively measure the performance of large scale data management solutions at NetApp, we use a fully automated infrastructure to execute end-to-end system performance tests. Both the software and user requirements of this infrastructure are complex: the system under test runs a multi-protocol, highly specialized operating system and the infrastructure serves a diverse audience of developers, analysts, and field engineers (including both sales and support). In this paper we describe our approach to rapidly constructing automated performance system tests by using a lightweight, little, or domain-specific language called SLSL in order to more effectively express test specifications.<\/jats:p>\n          <jats:p>Using a real world example, we illustrate the efficacy of SLSL in terms of its expressiveness, flexibility, and ease of use by showing a complex test configuration expressed with just a few language constructs. We also demonstrate how SLSL can be used in conjunction with our performance measurement lab to quickly deploy performance tests that yield highly repeatable measurements..<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1145\/2160803.2160843","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,3,13]],"date-time":"2012-03-13T12:29:14Z","timestamp":1331641754000},"page":"19-19","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["A little language for rapidly constructing automated performance tests (abstracts only)"],"prefix":"10.1145","volume":"39","author":[{"given":"Shaun","family":"Dunning","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Darren","family":"Sawyer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,21]]},"container-title":["ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/2160803.2160843","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T10:06:41Z","timestamp":1750241201000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/2160803.2160843"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,21]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,21]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1145\/2160803.2160843"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2160803.2160843","relation":{},"ISSN":["0163-5999"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0163-5999"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2011-12-21","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}