{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]],"date-time":"2026-03-06T08:47:32Z","timestamp":1772786852070,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,9,1]],"date-time":"2012-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1346457600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Queue"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>In the early 2000s, Amazon created GameDay, a program designed to increase resilience by purposely injecting major failures into critical systems semi-regularly to discover flaws and subtle dependencies. Basically, a GameDay exercise tests a company\u2019s systems, software, and people in the course of preparing for a response to a disastrous event. Widespread acceptance of the GameDay concept has taken a few years, but many companies now see its value and have started to adopt their own versions. This discussion considers some of those experiences.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1145\/2367376.2371297","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,3]],"date-time":"2020-09-03T03:28:46Z","timestamp":1599103726000},"page":"20-28","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Resilience Engineering: Learning to Embrace Failure"],"prefix":"10.1145","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"Jesse","family":"Robbins","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Amazon"}]},{"given":"Kripa","family":"Krishnan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Google"}]},{"given":"John","family":"Allspaw","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Etsy"}]},{"given":"Thomas A.","family":"Limoncelli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"StackOverflow"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,9,12]]},"container-title":["Queue"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/2367376.2371297","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/2367376.2371297","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T08:48:48Z","timestamp":1750236528000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/2367376.2371297"}},"subtitle":["A discussion with Jesse Robbins, Kripa Krishnan, John Allspaw, and Tom Limoncelli"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,9]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1145\/2367376.2371297"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2367376.2371297","relation":{},"ISSN":["1542-7730","1542-7749"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1542-7730","type":"print"},{"value":"1542-7749","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2012-09-12","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}