{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,30]],"date-time":"2025-07-30T14:35:40Z","timestamp":1753886140431,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,1]],"date-time":"2012-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1354320000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["eLearn"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>More and more students at all levels of education submit \u201ce-documents\u201d for assessment, grading, and instructor review. While retaining an electronic format, there are several free or low cost software tools available to facilitate this process. Each of the tools mentioned here have been empirically tested in the classroom and\/or online setting\u2014giving feedback to more than 100 students. Results suggest selecting tools that fit your instructional methods and assignments (while not sacrificing quality) can save you time and actually improve your feedback to students.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1145\/2407138.2407139","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,5]],"date-time":"2012-12-05T18:55:48Z","timestamp":1354733748000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The Best Assessment Tools for the Online Classroom"],"prefix":"10.1145","volume":"2012","author":[{"given":"Martin","family":"Sivula","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Johnson &amp; Wales University"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,4]]},"container-title":["eLearn"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/2407138.2407139","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/ft_gateway.cfm?id=2407139&ftid=1323859&dwn=1","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T20:01:03Z","timestamp":1750276863000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/2407138.2407139"}},"subtitle":["Instructor feedback and e-documents"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1145\/2407138.2407139"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2407138.2407139","relation":{},"ISSN":["1535-394X"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1535-394X"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2012-12-04","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}],"article-number":"2407138.2407139"}}