{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,17]],"date-time":"2025-11-17T14:13:42Z","timestamp":1763388822434,"version":"3.41.0"},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,29]],"date-time":"2013-04-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1367193600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,29]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Over the last few years, we have witnessed the deployment of large measurement platforms that enable measurements from many vantage points. Examples of these platforms include SamKnows and RIPE ATLAS. All told, there are tens of thousands of measurement agents. Most of these measurement agents are located in the end-user premises; these can run measurements against other user agents located in strategic locations, according to the measurements to be performed. Thanks to the large number of measurement agents, these platforms can provide data about key network performance indicators from the end-user perspective. This data is useful to network operators to improve their operations, as well to regulators and to end users themselves. Currently deployed platforms use proprietary protocols to exchange information between the different parts. As these platforms grow to become an important tool to understand network performance, it is important to standardize the protocols between the different elements of the platform. In this paper, we present ongoing standardization efforts in this area as well as the main challenges that these efforts are facing.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1145\/2479957.2479967","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,5,1]],"date-time":"2013-05-01T19:47:09Z","timestamp":1367437629000},"page":"58-63","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Standardizing large-scale measurement platforms"],"prefix":"10.1145","volume":"43","author":[{"given":"Marcelo","family":"Bagnulo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganes, Spain"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Philip","family":"Eardley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"BT, Ipswich, United Kingdom"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Trevor","family":"Burbridge","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"BT, Ipswich, United Kingdom"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Brian","family":"Trammell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rolf","family":"Winter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Applied Sciences Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_1_1","unstructured":"http:\/\/www.samknows.com.  http:\/\/www.samknows.com."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","unstructured":"SamKnows July 2011. Test Methodology White Paper.  SamKnows July 2011. Test Methodology White Paper."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","unstructured":"N. Feamster May 2011. TheBISMark Project: Broadband Measurements from the Network Gateway.  N. Feamster May 2011. TheBISMark Project: Broadband Measurements from the Network Gateway."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","unstructured":"R. Kisteleki May 2011. RIPE Atlas First results.  R. Kisteleki May 2011. RIPE Atlas First results."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","unstructured":"http:\/\/www.ookla.com\/  http:\/\/www.ookla.com\/"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2398776.2398805"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/1879141.1879173"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","unstructured":"H. Schulzrinne W. Johnston J. Miller September 2012. Large-Scale Measurement of Broadband Performance: Use Cases Architecture and Protocol Requirements. Internet-Draft draft-schulzrinne-lmap-requirements-00  H. Schulzrinne W. Johnston J. Miller September 2012. Large-Scale Measurement of Broadband Performance: Use Cases Architecture and Protocol Requirements. Internet-Draft draft-schulzrinne-lmap-requirements-00"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","unstructured":"WT-304. Broadband Access Service Attributes and Performance Metrics. http:\/\/www.broadband-forum.org\/technical\/technicalwip.php  WT-304. Broadband Access Service Attributes and Performance Metrics. http:\/\/www.broadband-forum.org\/technical\/technicalwip.php"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","unstructured":"TR-143 May 2008. Enabling Network Throughput Performance Tests and Statistical Monitoring. http:\/\/www.broadband-forum.org\/technical\/download\/TR-143.pdf  TR-143 May 2008. Enabling Network Throughput Performance Tests and Statistical Monitoring. http:\/\/www.broadband-forum.org\/technical\/download\/TR-143.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_1","unstructured":"P802.16.3 Project: Mobile Broadband Network Performance Measurements. http:\/\/www.ieee802.org\/16\/mbnpm\/index.html  P802.16.3 Project: Mobile Broadband Network Performance Measurements. http:\/\/www.ieee802.org\/16\/mbnpm\/index.html"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"E. Stephan August 2005. IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Metrics Registry. BCP 108 RFC 4148.  E. Stephan August 2005. IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Metrics Registry. BCP 108 RFC 4148.","DOI":"10.17487\/rfc4148"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A. Morton April 2011. RFC 4148 and the IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Registry of Metrics Are Obsolete. RFC 6248.  A. Morton April 2011. RFC 4148 and the IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Registry of Metrics Are Obsolete. RFC 6248.","DOI":"10.17487\/rfc6248"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_1","unstructured":"M. Bagnulo T. Burbridge S. Crawford P. Eardley A. Morton January 15 2013. A registry for commonly used metrics. Independent registries. Internet-Draft draft-bagnulo-ippm-new-registry-independent.  M. Bagnulo T. Burbridge S. Crawford P. Eardley A. Morton January 15 2013. A registry for commonly used metrics. Independent registries. Internet-Draft draft-bagnulo-ippm-new-registry-independent."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. Mathis M. Allman July 2001. A Framework for Defining Empirical Bulk Transfer Capacity Metrics. RFC 3148.   M. Mathis M. Allman July 2001. A Framework for Defining Empirical Bulk Transfer Capacity Metrics. RFC 3148.","DOI":"10.17487\/rfc3148"}],"container-title":["ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/2479957.2479967","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/2479957.2479967","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T08:35:28Z","timestamp":1750235728000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/2479957.2479967"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,29]]},"references-count":15,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,29]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1145\/2479957.2479967"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2479957.2479967","relation":{},"ISSN":["0146-4833"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0146-4833"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2013-04-29","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}