{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,24]],"date-time":"2026-01-24T07:46:50Z","timestamp":1769240810973,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,7,12]],"date-time":"2013-07-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1373587200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,7,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The objective of this paper is to conduct a controlled experiment with the three requirements prioritization techniques: Numerical Assignment (NA), Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Extensive Numerical Assignment (ENA), each based on ordinal, ratio and interval scales respectively. NA and AHP are widely used traditional requirements prioritization techniques. ENA is a novel technique introduced by the authors, which acknowledges the uncertain and incomplete nature of human judgment about requirements priorities, which are in turn uncertain guesses about the upcoming product. The aim of the experiment is to examine the three techniques using various objective and subjective measures like number of decisions, time consumption, ease of use, attractiveness, scalability and reprioritizability. The experiment was executed by prioritizing the requirements of a university website system with students as participants in the experiment. The results of the experiment proved that ENA transcends NA and AHP.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1145\/2492248.2492278","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,7,16]],"date-time":"2013-07-16T18:06:45Z","timestamp":1373998005000},"page":"1-10","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["Comparison of requirements prioritization techniques employing different scales of measurement"],"prefix":"10.1145","volume":"38","author":[{"given":"Persis","family":"Voola","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Adi Kavi Nannaya University, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A. Vinaya","family":"Babu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,7,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_1_1","first-page":"37","article-title":"Requirements Uncertainty Prioritization Approach: A Novel Approach for Requirements Prioritization. Software Engineering : An International Journal (SEIJ) Vol 2","volume":"2","author":"Voola Persis","year":"2012","journal-title":"No"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","first-page":"47","article-title":"Post-Release Analysis Of Requirements Selection Quality An Industrial Case Study in Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering:Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ'03), Velden","author":"Karlsson Lena","year":"2003","journal-title":"Austria"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","unstructured":"Wendy J Steinberg. Statistics Alive. 2nd edition ISBN: 978141979504. Wendy J Steinberg. Statistics Alive. 2nd edition ISBN: 978141979504."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/TSMCA.2002.802746"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Persis Voola and A.Vinaya Babu. Interval Evidential Reasoning Algorithm for Requirements Prioritisation. In proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications Springer-Verlag pp. 915--922. Persis Voola and A.Vinaya Babu. Interval Evidential Reasoning Algorithm for Requirements Prioritisation. In proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications Springer-Verlag pp. 915--922.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-27443-5_105"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-69062-7_11"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/52.605933"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","article-title":"Saaty Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process","volume":"1","author":"Thomas","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int.J.Services"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"B. Regnell M. Host. J. Natt och Dag P. Beremark and T. Hjelm. An Industrial Case Study on Distributed Prioritization in Market Driven Requirements Engineering for Packaged Software Requirements. Published in Requirements Engineering Vol 6 2001 pp 51--62 doi:10.2007\/s007660170015. B. Regnell M. Host. J. Natt och Dag P. Beremark and T. Hjelm. An Industrial Case Study on Distributed Prioritization in Market Driven Requirements Engineering for Packaged Software Requirements. Published in Requirements Engineering Vol 6 2001 pp 51--62 doi:10.2007\/s007660170015.","DOI":"10.1007\/s007660170015"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2005.02.064"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_1","unstructured":"Marcus Keutel Werner Mellis. An In-Depth Interpretive Case Study in Requirements Engineering Research: Experiences and Recommendations. University of Cologne. Marcus Keutel Werner Mellis. An In-Depth Interpretive Case Study in Requirements Engineering Research: Experiences and Recommendations. University of Cologne."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"H.F. Hoffman Requirements Engineering: A Situated Discovery Process Gabler Wiesbaden Germany 2000. H.F. Hoffman Requirements Engineering: A Situated Discovery Process Gabler Wiesbaden Germany 2000.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-663-07965-1_3"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Joseph Momoh and Gunter Ruhe. Release Planning Process Improvement -- An Industrial Case Study. Published in Software Process Improvement and Practice 2006; 11:295--307. Joseph Momoh and Gunter Ruhe. Release Planning Process Improvement -- An Industrial Case Study. Published in Software Process Improvement and Practice 2006; 11:295--307.","DOI":"10.1002\/spip.273"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_1","volume-title":"International Conference on Information and Emerging Technologies (ICIET)","year":"2010"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_1_16_1","first-page":"35","article-title":"Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process For Decision Making","volume":"2","author":"Triantaphyllou Evangelos","year":"1995","journal-title":"Engineering Applications: Some Challenges. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Applications and Practice"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_17_1","first-page":"939","volume-title":"Published in Elsevier","author":"Karlsson","year":"1997"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_18_1","unstructured":"Berander P ( 2004 ). Prioritization of Stakeholder Needs in Software Engineering: Understanding and Evaluation. Blekinge Institute of Technology Licentiate Series No .2004:12 Department of Systems and Software engineering Sweden. Berander P (2004). Prioritization of Stakeholder Needs in Software Engineering: Understanding and Evaluation. Blekinge Institute of Technology Licentiate Series No.2004:12 Department of Systems and Software engineering Sweden."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Karlsson L. Berander P. Regnell B. and Wohlin C.(2004). Requirements Prioritisation : An Experiment on Exhaustive Pair-Wise Comparisons Versus Planning Game Partitioning.In proceedings of Empirical Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2004) Edinburgh Scotland. Karlsson L. Berander P. Regnell B. and Wohlin C.(2004). Requirements Prioritisation : An Experiment on Exhaustive Pair-Wise Comparisons Versus Planning Game Partitioning.In proceedings of Empirical Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2004) Edinburgh Scotland.","DOI":"10.1049\/ic:20040407"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_20_1","unstructured":"Ahl A. (2005). An Experimental Comparison of Five Prioritization Techniques Investigating Ease of Use Accuracy and Scalability. Master Thesis No. MSE-2005-11 School of Engineering Blekinge Institute of Technology. Ahl A. (2005). An Experimental Comparison of Five Prioritization Techniques Investigating Ease of Use Accuracy and Scalability. Master Thesis No. MSE-2005-11 School of Engineering Blekinge Institute of Technology."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_21_1","unstructured":"Deepak Sahni. \"A Controlled Experiment on Analytical Hierarchy Process and Cumulative Voting\" Investigating Time Scalability Accuracy Ease of Use and Ease of Learning. Master Thesis No. MSE-2007-17 School of Engineering Blekinge Institute of Technology. Deepak Sahni. \"A Controlled Experiment on Analytical Hierarchy Process and Cumulative Voting\" Investigating Time Scalability Accuracy Ease of Use and Ease of Learning. Master Thesis No. MSE-2007-17 School of Engineering Blekinge Institute of Technology."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_22_1","unstructured":"Ron Weber. Information System Control and Audit. ISBN: 81-317-0472-6. Ron Weber. Information System Control and Audit. ISBN: 81-317-0472-6."},{"issue":"2684","key":"e_1_2_1_23_1","first-page":"677","article-title":"On the Theory of Scales of Measurement. Published in Science","volume":"103","author":"Stevens S. S.","year":"1946","journal-title":"New Series"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ruhe G. Sailu M. O. The Science and Practice of Software Release Planning. IEEE Software (2005). Ruhe G. Sailu M. O. The Science and Practice of Software Release Planning. IEEE Software (2005).","DOI":"10.1142\/9789812775245_0013"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_25_1","unstructured":"Robertson James and Suzanne. Volere Requirements Template. http:\/\/www.volere.co.uk\/rst.htm. Robertson James and Suzanne. Volere Requirements Template. http:\/\/www.volere.co.uk\/rst.htm."},{"issue":"07","key":"e_1_2_1_26_1","first-page":"1653","article-title":"Evolving Prioritization For Software Product Management","volume":"2007","author":"Berander Patrik","journal-title":"Blekinge Institute of Technology Doctoral Dissertation Series No"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/MC.2003.1185216"}],"container-title":["ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/2492248.2492278","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/2492248.2492278","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T08:39:02Z","timestamp":1750235942000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/2492248.2492278"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,7,12]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,7,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1145\/2492248.2492278"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2492248.2492278","relation":{},"ISSN":["0163-5948"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0163-5948","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,7,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2013-07-12","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}