{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,2]],"date-time":"2025-08-02T05:24:02Z","timestamp":1754112242060,"version":"3.41.0"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":15,"publisher":"ACM","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,6,8]],"date-time":"2015-06-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1433721600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"funder":[{"name":"Australian Government"},{"name":"Australian Research Council"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,6,8]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/2746090.2746100","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,6,25]],"date-time":"2015-06-25T14:43:22Z","timestamp":1435243402000},"page":"99-108","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"title":["Deontic defeasible reasoning in legal interpretation"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"given":"Antonino","family":"Rotolo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"CIRSFID, University of Bologna, Italy"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Guido","family":"Governatori","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"NICTA, Australia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Giovanni","family":"Sartor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"EUI and University of Bologna, Italy"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,6,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_1_1","unstructured":"R. Alexy and R. Dreier. Statutory interpretation in the Federal Republic of Germany. In MacCormick and Summers {11}.  R. Alexy and R. Dreier. Statutory interpretation in the Federal Republic of Germany. In MacCormick and Summers {11}."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/371316.371517"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_3_1","volume-title":"Proc. JURIX","author":"Araszkiewicz M.","year":"2013","unstructured":"M. Araszkiewicz . Towards systematic research on statutory interpretation in AI and law . In Proc. JURIX 2013 . IOS Press , 2013. M. Araszkiewicz. Towards systematic research on statutory interpretation in AI and law. In Proc. JURIX 2013. IOS Press, 2013."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_4_1","volume-title":"Proc. JURIX","author":"Araszkiewicz M.","year":"2014","unstructured":"M. Araszkiewicz . Scientia juris: A missing link in the modelling of statutory reasoning . In Proc. JURIX 2014 . IOS Press , 2014. M. Araszkiewicz. Scientia juris: A missing link in the modelling of statutory reasoning. In Proc. JURIX 2014. IOS Press, 2014."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_5_1","volume-title":"Proc. KR","author":"Boella G.","year":"2010","unstructured":"G. Boella , G. Governatori , A. Rotolo , and L. van der Torre . A logical understanding of legal interpretation . In Proc. KR 2010 . AAAI Press , 2010. G. Boella, G. Governatori, A. Rotolo, and L. van der Torre. A logical understanding of legal interpretation. In Proc. KR 2010. AAAI Press, 2010."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_6_1","volume-title":"Legal interpretation and coherence","author":"Brozek B.","year":"2013","unstructured":"B. Brozek . Legal interpretation and coherence . In M. Araszkiewicz and J. Savelka, editors, Coherence : Insights from Philosophy, Jurisprudence and Artificial Intelligence. Springer , 2013 . B. Brozek. Legal interpretation and coherence. In M. Araszkiewicz and J. Savelka, editors, Coherence: Insights from Philosophy, Jurisprudence and Artificial Intelligence. Springer, 2013."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-013-9295-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10458-008-9030-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/jigpal\/jzp075"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_10_1","volume-title":"Proc. ARGUMENTATION 2012","author":"Macagno F.","year":"2012","unstructured":"F. Macagno , G. Sartor , and D. Walton . Argumentation schemes for statutory interpretation . In Proc. ARGUMENTATION 2012 . Masaryk University , 2012 . F. Macagno, G. Sartor, and D. Walton. Argumentation schemes for statutory interpretation. In Proc. ARGUMENTATION 2012. Masaryk University, 2012."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_11_1","volume-title":"Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study. Ashgate","author":"MacCormick D.","year":"1991","unstructured":"D. MacCormick and R. Summers , editors . Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study. Ashgate , 1991 . D. MacCormick and R. Summers, editors. Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study. Ashgate, 1991."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_12_1","volume-title":"Proc. JURIX","author":"Prakken H.","year":"2013","unstructured":"H. Prakken and G. Sartor . Formalising arguments about norms . In Proc. JURIX 2013 . IOS Press , 2013. H. Prakken and G. Sartor. Formalising arguments about norms. In Proc. JURIX 2013. IOS Press, 2013."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_13_1","volume-title":"On Law and Justice","author":"Ross A.","year":"1958","unstructured":"A. Ross . On Law and Justice . Stevens , London , 1958 . A. Ross. On Law and Justice. Stevens, London, 1958."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_14_1","volume-title":"Proc. JURIX","author":"Sartor G.","year":"2014","unstructured":"G. Sartor , D. Walton , F. Macagno , and A. Rotolo . Argumentation schemes for statutory interpretation: A logical analysis . In Proc. JURIX 2014 . IOS Press , 2014. G. Sartor, D. Walton, F. Macagno, and A. Rotolo. Argumentation schemes for statutory interpretation: A logical analysis. In Proc. JURIX 2014. IOS Press, 2014."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_15_1","volume-title":"L'interpretazione della legge. Giuffr\u00e8","author":"Tarello G.","year":"1980","unstructured":"G. Tarello . L'interpretazione della legge. Giuffr\u00e8 , 1980 . G. Tarello. L'interpretazione della legge. Giuffr\u00e8, 1980."}],"event":{"name":"ICAIL '15: 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law","sponsor":["Center for IP Law & Markets Center for Intellectual Property Law & Markets, University of San Diego School of Law","TrademarkNow TrademarkNow","The International Association for Artificial Intelligence and Law","Davis Polk Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP","Legal Robot Legal Robot","Thomson Reuters Thomson Reuters Corporation","SIGAI ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence"],"location":"San Diego California","acronym":"ICAIL '15"},"container-title":["Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/2746090.2746100","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/2746090.2746100","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T06:16:43Z","timestamp":1750227403000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/2746090.2746100"}},"subtitle":["two options for modelling interpretive arguments"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,6,8]]},"references-count":15,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/2746090.2746100","10.1145\/2746090"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2746090.2746100","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,6,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2015-06-08","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}