{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,28]],"date-time":"2025-09-28T04:17:51Z","timestamp":1759033071701,"version":"3.41.0"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,11]],"date-time":"2016-05-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1462924800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The Unified Modeling Language (UML), with its 14 different diagram types, is the de-facto standard modeling language for object-oriented software modeling and documentation. Since the various UML diagrams describe different views of one, and only one, software system under development, they strongly depend on each other in many ways. In other words, the UML diagrams describing a software system must be consistent. Inconsistencies among these diagrams may be a source of faults during software development and analysis. It is therefore paramount that these inconsistencies be detected, analyzed and -- hopefully -- fixed. The goal of this workshop was to gather input and feedbacks on UML consistency rules from the community. This workshop provided an opportunity for researchers who have been working in the area of UML consistency to interact with each other at a highly interactive venue, improve the body of knowledge on UML consistency rules and discuss ideas for further research in this area. This report summarizes details of the workshop and the results obtained that day.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1145\/2894784.2894801","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,13]],"date-time":"2016-05-13T14:30:58Z","timestamp":1463149858000},"page":"34-37","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["1st International Workshop on UML Consistency Rules (WUCOR 2015)"],"prefix":"10.1145","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"Damiano","family":"Torre","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada and University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain"}]},{"given":"Yvan","family":"Labiche","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada"}]},{"given":"Marcela","family":"Genero","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain"}]},{"given":"Maged","family":"Elaasar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada"}]},{"given":"Tuhin Kanti","family":"Das","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Queen's University, Kingston, Canada"}]},{"given":"Bernhard","family":"Hoisl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, Austria"}]},{"given":"Matthias","family":"Kowal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Technische Universit\u00e4t Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_1_1","unstructured":"Mukerji J. and J. Miller 2003. Overview and guide to OMG's architecture. http:\/\/www.omg.org\/mda\/ (last accessed Dec. 2015).  Mukerji J. and J. Miller 2003. Overview and guide to OMG's architecture. http:\/\/www.omg.org\/mda\/ (last accessed Dec. 2015)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/MS.2004.1293067"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2009.04.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4018\/jdm.2011070103"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/ASEA.2008.40"},{"volume-title":"OMG Unified Modeling Language Version 2.5","key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","unstructured":"OMG, 2015. OMG Unified Modeling Language Version 2.5 . Object Management Group OMG, 2015. OMG Unified Modeling Language Version 2.5. Object Management Group"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","volume-title":"UML Bible","author":"Pender T.","unstructured":"Pender , T. , 2003. UML Bible ( 1 st ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. , New York, NY, USA . Pender, T., 2003. UML Bible (1st ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA.","edition":"1"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5555\/2486788.2486883"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","unstructured":"Ibrahim N. R. Ibrahim M.Z. Saringat D. Mansor and T. Herawan 2011. Consistency rules between UML use case and activity diagrams using logical approach. International Journal of Software Engineering and its Applications 5 3 119--134.  Ibrahim N. R. Ibrahim M.Z. Saringat D. Mansor and T. Herawan 2011. Consistency rules between UML use case and activity diagrams using logical approach. International Journal of Software Engineering and its Applications 5 3 119--134."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Simmonds J. R.V. Straeten V. Jonkers and T. Mens 2004. Maintaining Consistency between UML Models using Description Logic. RSTI -- L'Object LMO'04 10 2-3 231--244.  Simmonds J. R.V. Straeten V. Jonkers and T. Mens 2004. Maintaining Consistency between UML Models using Description Logic. RSTI -- L'Object LMO'04 10 2-3 231--244.","DOI":"10.3166\/objet.10.2-3.231-244"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-31797-5_1"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/WICSA.2005.37"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Spanoudakis G. and A. Zisman 2001. Inconsistency management in software engineering: Survey and open research issues. In Handbook of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering S.K. Chang Ed. World Scientific Publ. Co. Singapore 329--380.  Spanoudakis G. and A. Zisman 2001. Inconsistency management in software engineering: Survey and open research issues. In Handbook of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering S.K. Chang Ed. World Scientific Publ. Co. Singapore 329--380.","DOI":"10.1142\/9789812389718_0015"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2601248.2601292"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Torre D. Y. Labiche M. Genero and M. Elaasar 2015. A systematic identification of consistency rules for UML diagrams. Carleton University. http:\/\/goo.gl\/TFMgnE.  Torre D. Y. Labiche M. Genero and M. Elaasar 2015. A systematic identification of consistency rules for UML diagrams. Carleton University. http:\/\/goo.gl\/TFMgnE.","DOI":"10.1145\/2601248.2601292"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_16_1","unstructured":"Torre D. Y. Labiche M. Genero and M. Elaasar 2015. Introduction to WUCOR 2015. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on UML Consistency Rules (WUCOR 2015) co-located with ACM\/IEEE 18th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MoDELS 2015) (Ottawa 2015) CEUR. http:\/\/ceur-ws.org\/Vol-1508\/.  Torre D. Y. Labiche M. Genero and M. Elaasar 2015. Introduction to WUCOR 2015. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on UML Consistency Rules (WUCOR 2015) co-located with ACM\/IEEE 18th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MoDELS 2015) (Ottawa 2015) CEUR. http:\/\/ceur-ws.org\/Vol-1508\/."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_17_1","unstructured":"Hoisl B. and S. Sobernig 2015. Consistency Rules for UML-based Domain-specific Language Models: A Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on UML Consistency Rules (WUCOR 2015) co-located with ACM\/IEEE 18th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MoDELS 2015) (Ottawa Canada September 28 2015) CEUR.  Hoisl B. and S. Sobernig 2015. Consistency Rules for UML-based Domain-specific Language Models: A Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on UML Consistency Rules (WUCOR 2015) co-located with ACM\/IEEE 18th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MoDELS 2015) (Ottawa Canada September 28 2015) CEUR."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2015.11.037"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_19_1","unstructured":"Chiorean D. V. Petra?cu and I. Chiorean 2015. Proposal for Improving the UML Abstract Syntax. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on UML Consistency Rules (WUCOR 2015) co-located with ACM\/IEEE 18th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MoDELS 2015) (Ottawa Canada September 28 2015) CEUR.  Chiorean D. V. Petra?cu and I. Chiorean 2015. Proposal for Improving the UML Abstract Syntax. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on UML Consistency Rules (WUCOR 2015) co-located with ACM\/IEEE 18th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MoDELS 2015) (Ottawa Canada September 28 2015) CEUR."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_20_1","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Experiences and Empirical Studies in Software Modeling - CEUR Workshop Proceedings (EESSMod 2013)","author":"Reggio G.","year":"2013","unstructured":"Reggio , G. , M. Leotta , F. Ricca , and D. Clerissi , 2013. What are the used UML diagrams? A Preliminary Survey . In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Experiences and Empirical Studies in Software Modeling - CEUR Workshop Proceedings (EESSMod 2013) (Miami, Florida - USA , October 1 2013 ), 3--12. Reggio, G., M. Leotta, F. Ricca, and D. Clerissi, 2013. What are the used UML diagrams? A Preliminary Survey. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Experiences and Empirical Studies in Software Modeling - CEUR Workshop Proceedings (EESSMod 2013) (Miami, Florida - USA, October 1 2013), 3--12."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_21_1","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2008)","author":"Petersen K.","year":"2008","unstructured":"Petersen , K. , R. Feldt , S. Mujtaba , and M. Mattsson , 2008. Systematic mapping studies in software engineering . In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2008) (Bari, Italy 2008 ), British Computer Society, 71--80. Petersen, K., R. Feldt, S. Mujtaba, and M. Mattsson, 2008. Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2008) (Bari, Italy 2008), British Computer Society, 71--80."}],"container-title":["ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/2894784.2894801","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/2894784.2894801","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T19:05:41Z","timestamp":1750273541000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/2894784.2894801"}},"subtitle":["Post workshop report"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,11]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1145\/2894784.2894801"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2894784.2894801","relation":{},"ISSN":["0163-5948"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0163-5948"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2016-05-11","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}