{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,31]],"date-time":"2025-12-31T07:45:24Z","timestamp":1767167124765,"version":"build-2238731810"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,25]],"date-time":"2017-05-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1495670400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["AI Matters"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,25]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The reproducibility of scientific experiments is crucial for corroborating, consolidating and reusing new scientific discoveries. However, the constant pressure for publishing results (Fanelli, 2010) has removed reproducibility from the agenda of many researchers: in a recent survey published in Nature (with more than 1500 scientists) over 70% of the participants recognize to have failed to reproduce the work from another colleague at some point in time (Baker, 2016). Analyses from psychology and cancer biology show reproducibility rates below 40% and 10% respectively (Collaboration, 2015) (Begley &amp; Lee, 2012). As a consequence, retractions of publications have occurred in the last years in several disciplines (Marcus &amp; Oransky, 2014) (Rockoff, 2015), and the general public is now skeptical about scientific studies on topics like pesticides, depression drugs or flu pandemics (American, 2010).<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1145\/3054837.3054839","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,25]],"date-time":"2017-05-25T12:16:45Z","timestamp":1495714605000},"page":"4-8","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["AI buzzwords explained"],"prefix":"10.1145","volume":"3","author":[{"given":"Daniel","family":"Garijo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Southern California"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_1_1","unstructured":"American S. (2010 October). In Science We Trust: Poll Results on How you Feel about Science. Scientific American.  American S. (2010 October). In Science We Trust: Poll Results on How you Feel about Science. Scientific American ."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baker M. (2016). 1 500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature 533(7604). Retrieved from http:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/1-500-scientists-lift-the-lid-on-reproducibility-1.19970  Baker M. (2016). 1 500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature 533 (7604). Retrieved from http:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/1-500-scientists-lift-the-lid-on-reproducibility-1.19970","DOI":"10.1038\/533452a"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Begley C. & Lee M. (2012 March). Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. 483 531--533.  Begley C. & Lee M. (2012 March). Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. 483 531--533.","DOI":"10.1038\/483531a"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.websem.2015.01.003"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2457317.2457376"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.is.2012.07.005"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/1142473.1142574"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","unstructured":"Chirigati F. Shasha D. & \n      \n      \n      Freire J.\n      \n  \n   (\n  2013\n  ). \n  ReproZip: Using Provenance to Support Computational Reproducibility\n  . In \n  Proceedings of the 5th USENIX Workshop on the Theory and Practice of Provenance (pp.\n   \n  1\n  :\n  1\n  -\n  1\n  :4). \n  Lombard Illinois\n  : \n  USENIX Association\n  . Retrieved from http:\/\/dl.acm.org\/citation.cfm?id=2482949.2482951   Chirigati F. Shasha D. & Freire J. (2013). ReproZip: Using Provenance to Support Computational Reproducibility. In Proceedings of the 5th USENIX Workshop on the Theory and Practice of Provenance (pp. 1:1-1:4). Lombard Illinois: USENIX Association. Retrieved from http:\/\/dl.acm.org\/citation.cfm?id=2482949.2482951"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Collaboration O. S. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349(6251).  Collaboration O. S. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349 (6251).","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aac4716"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Deelman E. Blythe J. Gil Y. Kesselman C. Mehta G. Patil S. ... Livny M. (2004). Pegasus: Mapping Scientific Workflows onto the Grid. In M. Dikaiakos (Ed.) Grid Computing (Vol. 3165 pp. 11--20). Springer Berlin \/ Heidelberg.  Deelman E. Blythe J. Gil Y. Kesselman C. Mehta G. Patil S. ... Livny M. (2004). Pegasus: Mapping Scientific Workflows onto the Grid. In M. Dikaiakos (Ed.) Grid Computing (Vol. 3165 pp. 11--20). Springer Berlin \/ Heidelberg.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-28642-4_2"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_1","series-title":"Vol. 3","volume-title":"Frontiers in Neuroinformatics","author":"Dinov I. D.","year":"2009"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0010271"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/eScience.2014.22"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/eScience.2014.33"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2110497.2110504"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0080278"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1101\/gr.4086505"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/MC.2007.421"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/MIS.2010.9"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_20_1","unstructured":"Goderis A. (2008). Workflow re-use and discovery in Bioinformatics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). School of Computer Science The University of Manchester.  Goderis A. (2008). Workflow re-use and discovery in Bioinformatics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). School of Computer Science The University of Manchester."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/11574620_25"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_22_1","unstructured":"Holl S. (2014). Automated Optimization Methods for Scientific Workflows in e-Science Infrastructures (Doctoral dissertation University of Bonn). Retrieved from http:\/\/hss.ulb.uni-bonn.de\/2014\/3508\/3508.htm  Holl S. (2014). Automated Optimization Methods for Scientific Workflows in e-Science Infrastructures (Doctoral dissertation University of Bonn). Retrieved from http:\/\/hss.ulb.uni-bonn.de\/2014\/3508\/3508.htm"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_23_1","volume-title":"ech. Rep.)","author":"Lebo T.","year":"2013"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/cpe.v18:10"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_25_1","unstructured":"Marcus A. & Oransky I. (2014 December). Top retractions of 2014. The Scientist.  Marcus A. & Oransky I. (2014 December). Top retractions of 2014. The Scientist ."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_26_1","volume-title":"CrowdLabs: Social Analysis and Visualization for the Sciences. In 23rd International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management (SS-DBM) (pp. 555--564)","author":"Mates P.","year":"2011"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_27_1","unstructured":"Missier P. Dey S. Belhajjame K. Cuevas-Vicenttn V. & \n      \n      \n      Ludscher B.\n      \n  \n   (\n  2013\n  ). \n  D-PROV: Extending the PROV Provenance Model with Workflow Structure\n  . In \n  Proceedings of the 5th USENIX Workshop on the Theory and Practice of Provenance (pp.\n   \n  9\n  :\n  1\n  -\n  9\n  :7). \n  Lombard Illinois\n  : \n  USENIX Association\n  . Retrieved from http:\/\/dl.acm.org\/citation .cfm?id=2482949.2482961   Missier P. Dey S. Belhajjame K. Cuevas-Vicenttn V. & Ludscher B. (2013). D-PROV: Extending the PROV Provenance Model with Workflow Structure. In Proceedings of the 5th USENIX Workshop on the Theory and Practice of Provenance (pp. 9:1-9:7). Lombard Illinois: USENIX Association. Retrieved from http:\/\/dl.acm.org\/citation .cfm?id=2482949.2482961"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/eScience.2016.7870888"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_29_1","unstructured":"Rockoff J. D. (2015 September). Amgen Finds Data Falsified in Obesity-Diabetes Study Featuring Grizzly Bears. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/amgen-finds-data-falsified-in-obesity-diabetes-study-featuring-grizzly-bears-1441123200  Rockoff J. D. (2015 September). Amgen Finds Data Falsified in Obesity-Diabetes Study Featuring Grizzly Bears. The Wall Street Journal . Retrieved from http:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/amgen-finds-data-falsified-in-obesity-diabetes-study-featuring-grizzly-bears-1441123200"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.future.2008.06.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_31_1","first-page":"11","article-title":"Towards Reproducibility in Scientific Workflows: An Infrastructure-Based Approach","volume":"2015","author":"Santana-Prez I.","year":"2015","journal-title":"Scientific Programming"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.14778\/2732977.2732988"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Taylor I. J. Deelman E. Gannon D. B. & Shields M. (2006). Workflows for e-Science: Scientific Workflows for Grids. Secaucus NJ USA: Springer-Verlag New York Inc.   Taylor I. J. Deelman E. Gannon D. B. & Shields M. (2006). Workflows for e-Science: Scientific Workflows for Grids . Secaucus NJ USA: Springer-Verlag New York Inc.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-84628-757-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wolstencroft K. Haines R. Fellows D. Williams A. Withers D. Owen S. ... Goble C. (2013). The Taverna workflow suite: designing and executing workflows of Web Services on the desktop web or in the cloud. Nucleic Acids Research.  Wolstencroft K. Haines R. Fellows D. Williams A. Withers D. Owen S. ... Goble C. (2013). The Taverna workflow suite: designing and executing workflows of Web Services on the desktop web or in the cloud. Nucleic Acids Research .","DOI":"10.1093\/nar\/gkt328"}],"container-title":["AI Matters"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3054837.3054839","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3054837.3054839","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,17]],"date-time":"2025-06-17T23:36:43Z","timestamp":1750203403000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3054837.3054839"}},"subtitle":["scientific workflows"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,25]]},"references-count":34,"aliases":["10.1145\/3067682.3067683"],"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,25]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3054837.3054839"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3054837.3054839","relation":{},"ISSN":["2372-3483"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2372-3483","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,25]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2017-05-25","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}