{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,16]],"date-time":"2025-07-16T13:39:24Z","timestamp":1752673164000,"version":"3.41.0"},"reference-count":4,"publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,18]],"date-time":"2017-04-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1492473600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["GetMobile: Mobile Comp. and Comm."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,18]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Evaluating an interactive system with users can be costly and timeconsuming. As a result, it can be extremely frustrating for evaluators whenever they are not able to use any of the data collected from the user evaluation of a system because of problems with how the study was designed or executed. In such instances, evaluators must learn from their mistakes and rerun the study a second time. However, the time, effort, and resources that went into completing the study the first time is still wasted. This problem can be minimized by first conducting a pilot study -- a small-scale version of the actual study -- prior to the final study, to identify, remove, and avoid any potential problems.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1145\/3081016.3081020","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,18]],"date-time":"2017-04-18T18:42:34Z","timestamp":1492540954000},"page":"8-11","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Pilot Studies"],"prefix":"10.1145","volume":"20","author":[{"given":"Khai","family":"Truong","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Toronto"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_1_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7748\/ns2002.06.16.40.33.c3214"},{"volume-title":"Doing Social Research","year":"1988","author":"Baker Therese L","key":"e_1_2_1_2_1"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/0974-7788.59946"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Noordzij Marlies Giovanni Tripepi Friedo W. Dekker Carmine Zoccali Michael W. Tanck and Kitty J. Jager. \"Sample size calculations: basic principles and common pitfalls.\" Nephrology dialysis transplantation (2010): gfp732.  Noordzij Marlies Giovanni Tripepi Friedo W. Dekker Carmine Zoccali Michael W. Tanck and Kitty J. Jager. \"Sample size calculations: basic principles and common pitfalls.\" Nephrology dialysis transplantation (2010): gfp732.","DOI":"10.1093\/ndt\/gfq563"}],"container-title":["GetMobile: Mobile Computing and Communications"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3081016.3081020","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3081016.3081020","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T03:36:59Z","timestamp":1750217819000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3081016.3081020"}},"subtitle":["When and how to conduct them when conducting user studies"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,18]]},"references-count":4,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,18]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3081016.3081020"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3081016.3081020","relation":{},"ISSN":["2375-0529","2375-0537"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2375-0529"},{"type":"electronic","value":"2375-0537"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,18]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2017-04-18","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}