{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,21]],"date-time":"2026-02-21T20:47:56Z","timestamp":1771706876224,"version":"3.50.1"},"publisher-location":"New York, New York, USA","reference-count":41,"publisher":"ACM Press","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,1]],"date-time":"2017-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1483228800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3097286.3097288","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,17]],"date-time":"2017-07-17T12:20:18Z","timestamp":1500294018000},"page":"1-10","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":22,"title":["Stance Classification of Twitter Debates"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"given":"Aseel","family":"Addawood","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Illinois Informatics Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jodi","family":"Schneider","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Information Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Masooda","family":"Bashir","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Information Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","reference":[{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anatoliy Gruzd and Melissa Goertzen. 2013. Wired academia: Why social science scholars are using social media. In Proceedings of the 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE, 3332--3341.","DOI":"10.1109\/HICSS.2013.614"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wei Wang, Ivan Hernandez, Daniel A Newman, Jibo He and Jiang Bian.2016.Twitter analysis: Studying US weekly trends in work stress and emotion. Applied Psychology, 65, 2 (2016), 355--378.","DOI":"10.1111\/apps.12065"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-3","unstructured":"Bo Pang, Lillian Lee and Shivakumar Vaithyanathan. 2002. Thumbs up?: Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In Proceedings of the ACL-02 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. ACL, 79--86."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Saif M Mohammad, Svetlana Kiritchenko, Parinaz Sobhani, Xiaodan Zhu and Colin Cherry. 2016. Semeval-2016 Task 6: Detecting stance in tweets. Proceedings of SemEval, 16 (2016).","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/S16-1003"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-5","unstructured":"Amjad Abu-Jbara, Mona Diab, Pradeep Dasigi and Dragomir Radev. 2012. Subgroup detection in ideological discussions. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. ACL, 399--409."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-6","unstructured":"Pranav Anand, Marilyn Walker, Rob Abbott, Jean E Fox Tree, Robeson Bowmani and Michael Minor. 2011. Cats rule and dogs drool!: Classifying stance in online debate. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis. ACL, 1--9."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-7","unstructured":"Jean Mark Gawron, Dipak Gupta, Kellen Stephens, Ming-Hsiang Tsou, Brian Spitzberg and Li An. 2012. Using group membership markers for group identification in web logs. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM). AAAI, 467--470."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-8","unstructured":"Kazi Saidul Hasan and Vincent Ng. 2013. Stance classification of ideological debates: Data, models, features, and constraints. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (IJCNLP). ACL, 1348--1356."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Minghui Qiu, Liu Yang and Jing Jiang. 2013. Modeling interaction features for debate side clustering. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. ACM, 873--878.","DOI":"10.1145\/2505515.2505634"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-10","unstructured":"Matt Thomas, Bo Pang and Lillian Lee. 2006. Get out the vote: Determining support or opposition from congressional floor-debate transcripts. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. ACL, 327--335."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Simone Teufel and Marc Moens.2002.Summarizing scientific articles: Experiments with relevance and rhetorical status. Computational Linguistics, 28, 4 (2002), 409--445.","DOI":"10.1162\/089120102762671936"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-12","unstructured":"Marilyn A Walker, Pranav Anand, Robert Abbott and Ricky Grant. 2012. Stance classification using dialogic properties of persuasion. In Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. ACL, 592--596."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Antonio Reyes, Paolo Rosso and Davide Buscaldi. 2012. From humor recognition to irony detection: The figurative language of social media. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 74 (2012), 1--12.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.datak.2012.02.005"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-14","unstructured":"Ellen Riloff, Ashequl Qadir, Prafulla Surve, Lalindra De Silva, Nathan Gilbert and Ruihong Huang. 2013. Sarcasm as contrast between a positive sentiment and negative situation. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. ACL, 704--714."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-15","unstructured":"Dave Lee. 2016, February 18. Apple vs the FBI---A plain English guide. Retrieved September 16, 2016 from http:\/\/www.bbc.com\/news\/technology-35601035."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-16","unstructured":"Aseel A. Addawood and Masooda N. Bashir. 2016. \"What is your evidence?\" A study of controversial topics on social media. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Argument Mining. ACL, 1--11."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-17","unstructured":"Wei-Hao Lin, Theresa Wilson, Janyce Wiebe and Alexander Hauptmann. 2006. Which side are you on?: Identifying perspectives at the document and sentence levels. In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. ACL, 109--116."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-18","unstructured":"Swapna Somasundaran and Janyce Wiebe. 2010. Recognizing stances in ideological on-line debates. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text. ACL, 116--124."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-19","unstructured":"Akiko Murakami and Rudy Raymond. 2010. Support or oppose?: classifying positions in online debates from reply activities and opinion expressions. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics. ACL, 869--875."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-20","unstructured":"Adam Faulkner.2014. Automated classification of stance in student essays: An approach using stance target information and the Wikipedia link-based measure. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference. AAAI, 174--179."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Parinaz Sobhani, Diana Inkpen and Stan Matwin. 2015. From argumentation mining to stance classification. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Argumentation Mining. ACL, 67--77.","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/W15-0509"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ashwin Rajadesingan and Huan Liu. 2014. Identifying users with opposing opinions in Twitter debates. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction. Springer, 153--160.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-05579-4_19"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Saif M. Mohammad, Xiaodan Zhu, Svetlana Kiritchenko and Joel Martin. 2015. Sentiment, emotion, purpose, and style in electoral tweets. Information Processing & Management, 51, 4 (2015), 480--499.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ipm.2014.09.003"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-24","unstructured":"S. Etlinger and W. Amand. 2012. Crimson Hexagon [Program documentation]. Retrieved September 15, 2016 from http:\/\/www.crimsonhexagon.com\/wp-cotent\/uploads\/2012\/02\/CrimsonHexagon_Altimeter_Webinar_111611.pdf."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Clayton A. Davis, Onur Varol, Emilio Ferrara, Alessandro Flammini and Filippo Menczer. 2016. BotOrNot: A system to evaluate social bots. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 273--274.","DOI":"10.1145\/2872518.2889302"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jacob Cohen. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 1 (1960), 37--46.","DOI":"10.1177\/001316446002000104"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Laura M. Smith, Linhong Zhu, Kristina Lerman and Zornitsa Kozareva. 2013. The role of social media in the discussion of controversial topics. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom). IEEE, 236--243.","DOI":"10.1109\/SocialCom.2013.41"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-28","unstructured":"Kevin Gimpel, Nathan Schneider, Brendan O'Connor, Dipanjan Das, Daniel Mills, Jacob Eisenstein, Michael Heilman, Dani Yogatama, Jeffrey Flanigan and Noah A. Smith. 2011. Part-of-speech tagging for Twitter: Annotation, features, and experiments. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL2011). ACL, 42--47."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Eugene Agichtein, Carlos Castillo, Debora Donato, Aristides Gionis and Gilad Mishne. 2008. Finding high-quality content in social media. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 183--194.","DOI":"10.1145\/1341531.1341557"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Carlos Castillo, Marcelo Mendoza and Barbara Poblete. 2011. Information credibility on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 675--684.","DOI":"10.1145\/1963405.1963500"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Theresa Wilson, Janyce Wiebe and Paul Hoffmann. 2005. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. ACL, 347--354.","DOI":"10.3115\/1220575.1220619"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-32","unstructured":"Steven Bird, Ewan Klein and Edward Loper. 2009. Natural language processing with Python: Analyzing text with the natural language toolkit. O'Reilly Media, Inc., Sebatstopol, CA."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-33","unstructured":"Nitesh V. Chawla. 2005. Data mining for imbalanced datasets: An overview in Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook. Springer, 853--867."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-34","unstructured":"Sotiris Kotsiantis, Dimitris Kanellopoulos and Panayiotis Pintelas. 2006. Handling imbalanced datasets: A review. GESTS International Transactions on Computer Science and Engineering, 30, 1 (2006), 25--36."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-35","unstructured":"Nitesh V. Chawla, Kevin W. Bowyer, Lawrence O. Hall and W. Philip Kegelmeyer. 2002. SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 16 (2002), 321--357."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rezvaneh Rezapour and Jana Diesner. 2017. Classification and detection of micro-level impact of issue-focused documentary films based on reviews. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 1419--1431.","DOI":"10.1145\/2998181.2998201"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nitesh V. Chawla, Nathalie Japkowicz and Aleksander Kotcz. 2004. Editorial: Special issue on learning from imbalanced data sets. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 6, 1 (2004), 1--6.","DOI":"10.1145\/1007730.1007733"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maria Liakata, Shyamasree Saha, Simon Dobnik, Colin Batchelor and Dietrich Rebholz-Schuhmann. 2012. Automatic recognition of conceptualization zones in scientific articles and two life science applications. Bioinformatics, 28, 7 (2012), 991--1000.","DOI":"10.1093\/bioinformatics\/bts071"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mark Hall, Eibe Frank, Geoffrey Holmes, Bernhard Pfahringer, Peter Reutemann and Ian H Witten. 2009. The WEKA data mining software: An update. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 11, 1 (2009), 10--18.","DOI":"10.1145\/1656274.1656278"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-40","unstructured":"Danny Roobaert, Grigoris Karakoulas and Nitesh V. Chawla. 2006. Information gain, correlation and Support Vector Machines in Feature extraction. Springer. 463--470."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3097286.3097288-41","unstructured":"Keith Hampton, Lee Rainie, Weixu Lu, Maria Dwyer, Inyoung Shin and Kristen Purcell. 2014. Social Media and the 'Spiral of Silence'. Retrieved September 10, 2016 from http:\/\/www.pewinternet.org\/2014\/08\/26\/social-media-and-the-spiral-of-silence\/."}],"event":{"name":"the 8th International Conference","location":"Toronto, ON, Canada","acronym":"#SMSociety17","number":"8","start":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,28]]},"end":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,30]]}},"container-title":["Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society - #SMSociety17"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3097286.3097288","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/dl.acm.org\/ft_gateway.cfm?id=3097288&ftid=1894936&dwn=1","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T03:30:38Z","timestamp":1750217438000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/dl.acm.org\/citation.cfm?doid=3097286.3097288"}},"subtitle":["The Encryption Debate as A Use Case"],"proceedings-subject":"Social Media & Society","short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017]]},"references-count":41,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3097286.3097288","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017]]}}}