{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,14]],"date-time":"2026-01-14T21:11:52Z","timestamp":1768425112266,"version":"3.49.0"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":32,"publisher":"ACM","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,29]],"date-time":"2018-03-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1522281600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,29]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3190645.3190684","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,30]],"date-time":"2018-03-30T12:21:43Z","timestamp":1522412503000},"page":"1-6","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["A model of a relative peer grading system for MOOCs"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"given":"Timothy","family":"Holston","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"The University of Mississippi University"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dawn","family":"Wilkins","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The University of Mississippi University"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_1_1","unstructured":"Stephen P Balfour. 2013. Assessing writing in MOOCs: Automated essay scoring and calibrated peer review (tm). Research & Practice in Assessment 8 (2013).  Stephen P Balfour. 2013. Assessing writing in MOOCs: Automated essay scoring and calibrated peer review (tm). Research & Practice in Assessment 8 (2013)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5944\/openpraxis.8.3.282"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_3_1","unstructured":"Calibrated Peer Review 2017. Calibrated Peer Review\u00e2\u010e\u0107: Web-based writing and peer review. (October 2017). http:\/\/cpr.molsci.ucla.edu\/Overview.aspx.  Calibrated Peer Review 2017. Calibrated Peer Review\u00e2\u010e\u0107: Web-based writing and peer review. (October 2017). http:\/\/cpr.molsci.ucla.edu\/Overview.aspx."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_4_1","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 675--683","author":"Caragiannis Ioannis","year":"2015"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2940716.2940748"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_6_1","unstructured":"Gr\u00e1inne Gr\u00e1inne Conole. 2015. MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. Revista de Educaci\u00f3n a Distancia 39 (2015).  Gr\u00e1inne Gr\u00e1inne Conole. 2015. MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. Revista de Educaci\u00f3n a Distancia 39 (2015)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nancy Falchikov and Judy Goldfinch. 2000. Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of educational research 70 3 (2000) 287--322.  Nancy Falchikov and Judy Goldfinch. 2000. Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of educational research 70 3 (2000) 287--322.","DOI":"10.3102\/00346543070003287"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_8_1","first-page":"76","article-title":"MOOCs: The Enduring Importance of \"Teacher Presence","volume":"16","author":"Foroughi Abbas","year":"2016","journal-title":"Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3991\/ijet.v10i4.4653"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_10_1","first-page":"n2","article-title":"Peer Grading in a MOOC: Reliability, Validity, and Perceived Effects","volume":"18","author":"Luo Heng","year":"2014","journal-title":"Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fei Mi and Dit-Yan Yeung. 2015. Probabilistic Graphical Models for Boosting Cardinal and Ordinal Peer Grading in MOOCs.. In AAAI. 454--460.   Fei Mi and Dit-Yan Yeung. 2015. Probabilistic Graphical Models for Boosting Cardinal and Ordinal Peer Grading in MOOCs.. In AAAI. 454--460.","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v29i1.9210"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_12_1","unstructured":"Debbie Morrison. 2013. The ultimate student guide to xMOOCs and CMOOCs. MOOC News and Reviews (2013).  Debbie Morrison. 2013. The ultimate student guide to xMOOCs and CMOOCs. MOOC News and Reviews (2013)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/03098770601167922"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_14_1","unstructured":"Chris Piech Jonathan Huang Zhenghao Chen Chuong Do Andrew Ng and Daphne Koller. 2013. Tuned models of peer assessment in MOOCs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.2579 (2013).  Chris Piech Jonathan Huang Zhenghao Chen Chuong Do Andrew Ng and Daphne Koller. 2013. Tuned models of peer assessment in MOOCs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.2579 (2013)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2623330.2623654"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2724660.2724678"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_17_1","unstructured":"Christian M Reiner Timothy W Bothell and Richard R Sudweeks. 2002. Preparing Effective Essay Questions. (2002).  Christian M Reiner Timothy W Bothell and Richard R Sudweeks. 2002. Preparing Effective Essay Questions. (2002)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"474","DOI":"10.2307\/4451167","article-title":"Calibrated Peer Review\u00e2\u010e\u0107: an application to increase student reading & writing skills","volume":"63","author":"Robinson Ralph","year":"2001","journal-title":"The American Biology Teacher"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5944\/openpraxis.5.1.42"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_20_1","unstructured":"Arlene A Russell. 2004. Calibrated peer review-a writing and critical-thinking instructional tool. Teaching Tips: Innovations in Undergraduate Science Instruction 54 (2004).  Arlene A Russell. 2004. Calibrated peer review-a writing and critical-thinking instructional tool. Teaching Tips: Innovations in Undergraduate Science Instruction 54 (2004)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Philip M Sadler and Eddie Good. 2006. The impact of self-and peer-grading on student learning. Educational assessment 11 1 (2006) 1--31.  Philip M Sadler and Eddie Good. 2006. The impact of self-and peer-grading on student learning. Educational assessment 11 1 (2006) 1--31.","DOI":"10.1207\/s15326977ea1101_1"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2876034.2876036"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_23_1","unstructured":"Rolf Schulmeister. 2014. The Position of xMOOCs in Educational Systems. eleed 10 1 (2014). http:\/\/nbn-resolving.de\/urn:nbn:de:0009-5-40743  Rolf Schulmeister. 2014. The Position of xMOOCs in Educational Systems. eleed 10 1 (2014). http:\/\/nbn-resolving.de\/urn:nbn:de:0009-5-40743"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_24_1","volume-title":"KDD Workshop on Data Mining for Educational Assessment and Feedback (ASSESS","author":"Shah Nihar B","year":"2014"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_25_1","volume-title":"NIPS Workshop on Data Driven Education.","author":"Shah Nihar B","year":"2013"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/03075079412331382153"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.19173\/irrodl.v15i3.1680"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Keith Topping. 1998. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of educational Research 68 3 (1998) 249--276.  Keith Topping. 1998. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of educational Research 68 3 (1998) 249--276.","DOI":"10.3102\/00346543068003249"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Keith J Topping. 2009. Peer assessment. Theory into practice 48 1 (2009) 20--27.  Keith J Topping. 2009. Peer assessment. Theory into practice 48 1 (2009) 20--27.","DOI":"10.1080\/00405840802577569"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.iheduc.2008.06.005"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_31_1","volume-title":"Poster presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education","author":"Xiong Y"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_32_1","unstructured":"Li Yuan Stephen Powell JISC CETIS et al. 2013. MOOCs and Open Education: Implications for higher education. (2013).  Li Yuan Stephen Powell JISC CETIS et al. 2013. MOOCs and Open Education: Implications for higher education. (2013)."}],"event":{"name":"ACM SE '18: Southeast Conference","location":"Richmond Kentucky","acronym":"ACM SE '18","sponsor":["ACM Association for Computing Machinery"]},"container-title":["Proceedings of the ACMSE 2018 Conference"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3190645.3190684","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3190645.3190684","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T02:26:50Z","timestamp":1750213610000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3190645.3190684"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,29]]},"references-count":32,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3190645.3190684","10.1145\/3190645"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3190645.3190684","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2018-03-29","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}