{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,5]],"date-time":"2026-01-05T11:23:05Z","timestamp":1767612185857,"version":"3.41.0"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":15,"publisher":"ACM","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,27]],"date-time":"2018-05-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1527379200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,27]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3195836.3195838","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,29]],"date-time":"2018-06-29T15:14:53Z","timestamp":1530285293000},"page":"57-60","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["How do practitioners perceive assurance cases in safety-critical software systems?"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"given":"Jinghui","family":"Cheng","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Polytechnique Montr\u00e9al, Montr\u00e9al, Canada"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Micayla","family":"Goodrum","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Notre Dame"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ronald","family":"Metoyer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Notre Dame"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jane","family":"Cleland-Huang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Notre Dame"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_1_1","volume-title":"https:\/\/www.adelard.com\/asce\/choosing-asce\/cae.html Accessed","author":"Arguments","year":"2017","unstructured":"Adelard. 2017. Claims, Arguments and Evidence (CAE). ( 2017 ). https:\/\/www.adelard.com\/asce\/choosing-asce\/cae.html Accessed 2017, May. Adelard. 2017. Claims, Arguments and Evidence (CAE). (2017). https:\/\/www.adelard.com\/asce\/choosing-asce\/cae.html Accessed 2017, May."},{"volume-title":"Ind. Perspect. Safety-critical Syst.","author":"Bishop Peter","unstructured":"Peter Bishop and Robin Bloomfield . 1998. A Methodology for Safety Case Development . In Ind. Perspect. Safety-critical Syst. Vol. 19 . Springer London , 194--203. Peter Bishop and Robin Bloomfield. 1998. A Methodology for Safety Case Development. In Ind. Perspect. Safety-critical Syst. Vol. 19. Springer London, 194--203.","key":"e_1_3_2_1_2_1"},{"volume-title":"Mak. Syst. Safer","author":"Bloomfield Robin","unstructured":"Robin Bloomfield and Peter Bishop . 2010. Safety and Assurance Cases: Past, Present and Possible Future - an Adelard Perspective . In Mak. Syst. Safer . Springer London , 51--67. Robin Bloomfield and Peter Bishop. 2010. Safety and Assurance Cases: Past, Present and Possible Future - an Adelard Perspective. In Mak. Syst. Safer. Springer London, 51--67.","key":"e_1_3_2_1_3_1"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_4_1","volume-title":"Composition of Safety Argument Patterns. In Int. Conf. Comput. Safety, Reliab. Secur. 51--63","author":"Denney Ewen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ewen Denney and Ganesh Pai . 2016 . Composition of Safety Argument Patterns. In Int. Conf. Comput. Safety, Reliab. Secur. 51--63 . Ewen Denney and Ganesh Pai. 2016. Composition of Safety Argument Patterns. In Int. Conf. Comput. Safety, Reliab. Secur. 51--63."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_5_1","volume-title":"Representing Confidence in Assurance Case Evidence. In Int. Conf. Comput. Safety, Reliab. Secur. 15--26","author":"Duan Lian","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lian Duan , Sanjai Rayadurgam , Mats P E Heimdahl , Oleg Sokolsky , and Insup Lee . 2014 . Representing Confidence in Assurance Case Evidence. In Int. Conf. Comput. Safety, Reliab. Secur. 15--26 . Lian Duan, Sanjai Rayadurgam, Mats P E Heimdahl, Oleg Sokolsky, and Insup Lee. 2014. Representing Confidence in Assurance Case Evidence. In Int. Conf. Comput. Safety, Reliab. Secur. 15--26."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_6_1","volume-title":"An investigation of proposed techniques for quantifying confidence in assurance arguments. Saf. Sci. 92 (feb","author":"Graydon Patrick J.","year":"2017","unstructured":"Patrick J. Graydon and C. Michael Holloway . 2017. An investigation of proposed techniques for quantifying confidence in assurance arguments. Saf. Sci. 92 (feb 2017 ), 53--65. Patrick J. Graydon and C. Michael Holloway. 2017. An investigation of proposed techniques for quantifying confidence in assurance arguments. Saf. Sci. 92 (feb 2017), 53--65."},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_2_1_7_1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ssci.2013.04.007"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_8_1","volume-title":"27th Int. Syst. Saf. Conf. 25--33","author":"Hawkins Richard","year":"2009","unstructured":"Richard Hawkins and Tim Kelly . 2009 . A Systematic Approach for Developing Software Safety Arguments . In 27th Int. Syst. Saf. Conf. 25--33 . Richard Hawkins and Tim Kelly. 2009. A Systematic Approach for Developing Software Safety Arguments. In 27th Int. Syst. Saf. Conf. 25--33."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_9_1","volume-title":"Proc. Dependable Syst. Networks 2004 Work. Assur. Cases.","author":"Kelly Tim","year":"2004","unstructured":"Tim Kelly and Rob Weaver . 2004 . The Goal Structuring Notation - A Safety Argument Notation . In Proc. Dependable Syst. Networks 2004 Work. Assur. Cases. Tim Kelly and Rob Weaver. 2004. The Goal Structuring Notation - A Safety Argument Notation. In Proc. Dependable Syst. Networks 2004 Work. Assur. Cases."},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_2_1_10_1","DOI":"10.2307\/2529310"},{"volume-title":"Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook","author":"Miles Matthew B","unstructured":"Matthew B Miles , A Michael Huberman , and Johnny Saldana . 2014. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook . Sage . Matthew B Miles, A Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldana. 2014. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Sage.","key":"e_1_3_2_1_12_1"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_13_1","first-page":"417","article-title":"Lessons from the North Sea: Should \"safety cases\" come to America","volume":"38","author":"Steinzor Rena","year":"2011","unstructured":"Rena Steinzor . 2011 . Lessons from the North Sea: Should \"safety cases\" come to America ? Bost. Coll. Environ. Aff. Law Rev. 38 , 2 (2011), 417 -- 444 . Rena Steinzor. 2011. Lessons from the North Sea: Should \"safety cases\" come to America? Bost. Coll. Environ. Aff. Law Rev. 38, 2 (2011), 417--444.","journal-title":"Bost. Coll. Environ. Aff. Law Rev."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_14_1","volume-title":"Should healthcare providers do safety cases? Lessons from a cross-industry review of safety case practices. Saf. Sci. 84 (apr","author":"Sujan Mark","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mark Sujan , Ibrahim Habli , Tim Kelly , Simone Pozzi , and Christopher Johnson . 2016. Should healthcare providers do safety cases? Lessons from a cross-industry review of safety case practices. Saf. Sci. 84 (apr 2016 ), 181--189. Mark Sujan, Ibrahim Habli, Tim Kelly, Simone Pozzi, and Christopher Johnson. 2016. Should healthcare providers do safety cases? Lessons from a cross-industry review of safety case practices. Saf. Sci. 84 (apr 2016), 181--189."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_15_1","volume-title":"Issue 7: Safety Management Requirements for Defence Systems. Part 1: Requirements.","author":"Defence U.K.","year":"2017","unstructured":"U.K. Ministry of Defence . 2017. Defence Standard 00--56 , Issue 7: Safety Management Requirements for Defence Systems. Part 1: Requirements. ( 2017 ). U.K. Ministry of Defence. 2017. Defence Standard 00--56, Issue 7: Safety Management Requirements for Defence Systems. Part 1: Requirements. (2017)."},{"unstructured":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2014. Infusion Pumps Total Product Life Cycle: Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff. (2014).  U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2014. Infusion Pumps Total Product Life Cycle: Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff. (2014).","key":"e_1_3_2_1_16_1"}],"event":{"sponsor":["SIGSOFT ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering","IEEE-CS Computer Society"],"acronym":"ICSE '18","name":"ICSE '18: 40th International Conference on Software Engineering","location":"Gothenburg Sweden"},"container-title":["Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3195836.3195838","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3195836.3195838","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T02:26:35Z","timestamp":1750213595000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3195836.3195838"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,27]]},"references-count":15,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3195836.3195838","10.1145\/3195836"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3195836.3195838","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,27]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2018-05-27","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}