{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,9]],"date-time":"2026-06-09T09:31:35Z","timestamp":1780997495258,"version":"3.54.1"},"publisher-location":"New York, New York, USA","reference-count":49,"publisher":"ACM Press","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,1]],"date-time":"2018-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1514764800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3216122.3216162","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,10]],"date-time":"2018-07-10T16:26:42Z","timestamp":1531240002000},"page":"183-192","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Computing Extensions of Dynamic Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with Second-Order Attacks"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"given":"Gianvincenzo","family":"Alfano","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Informatics, Modeling, Electronics and System Engineering (DIMES), University of Calabria, Rende (CS), Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sergio","family":"Greco","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Informatics, Modeling, Electronics and System Engineering (DIMES), University of Calabria, Rende (CS), Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Francesco","family":"Parisi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Informatics, Modeling, Electronics and System Engineering (DIMES), University of Calabria, Rende (CS), Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"320","reference":[{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-1","unstructured":"http:\/\/argumentationcompetition.org\/2017\/results.html, 2017."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-2","unstructured":"Gianvincenzo Alfano, Sergio Greco, and Francesco Parisi. Computing stable and preferred extensions of dynamic bipolar argumentation frameworks. In Proc. of Workshop on Advances In Argumentation In Artificial Intelligence co-located with XVI International Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA), pages 28--42, 2017."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gianvincenzo Alfano, Sergio Greco, and Francesco Parisi. Efficient computation of extensions for dynamic abstract argumentation frameworks: An incremental approach. In Proc. of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 49--55, 2017.","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2017\/8"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gianvincenzo Alfano, Sergio Greco, Francesco Parisi, Gerardo I. Simari, and Guillermo R. Simari. Incremental computation of warranted arguments in dynamic defeasible argumentation: The rule addition case. In Proc. of the Symp. on Applied Computing (SAC), pages 911--917, 2018.","DOI":"10.1145\/3167132.3167232"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-5","unstructured":"Teresa Alsinet, Josep Argelich, Ramón Béjar, César Fernández, Carles Mateu, and Jordi Planes. An argumentative approach for discovering relevant opinions in twitter with probabilistic valued relationships. Pattern Recognition Letters, In press, 2017."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Leila Amgoud and Srdjan Vesic. A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell., 63(2):149--183, 2011.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10472-011-9271-9"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Leila Amgoud and Srdjan Vesic. Revising option status in argument-based decision systems. Journal of Logic and Computation, 22(5):1019--1058, 2012.","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exq057"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Katie Atkinson, Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin, Anthony Hunter, Henry Prakken, Chris Reed, Guillermo R. Simari, Matthias Thimm, and Serena Villata. Towards artificial argumentation. AI Magazine, 38(3):25--36, 2017.","DOI":"10.1609\/aimag.v38i3.2704"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pietro Baroni, Martin Caminada, and Massimiliano Giacomin. An introduction to argumentation semantics. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 26(4):365--410, 2011.","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888911000166"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pietro Baroni, Federico Cerutti, Massimiliano Giacomin, and Giovanni Guida. Encompassing attacks to attacks in abstract argumentation frameworks. In Proc. of European Conf. on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU), pages 83--94, 2009.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-02906-6_9"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin, and Beishui Liao. On topology-related properties of abstract argumentation semantics. A correction and extension to dynamics of argumentation systems: A division-based method. Artificial Intelligence, 212:104--115, 2014.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2014.03.003"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ringo Baumann. Splitting an argumentation framework. In Proc. of International Conference on Logic Programming and Non-Monotonic Reasoning (LPNMR), pages 40--53, 2011.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-20895-9_6"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ringo Baumann. Normal and strong expansion equivalence for argumentation frameworks. Artificial Intelligence, 193:18--44, 2012.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2012.08.004"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-14","unstructured":"Ringo Baumann. Context-free and context-sensitive kernels: Update and deletion equivalence in abstract argumentation. In Proc. of European Conf. on Art. Int. (ECAI), pages 63--68, 2014."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ringo Baumann and Gerhard Brewka. Expanding argumentation frameworks: Enforcing and monotonicity results. In Proc. of Third International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA), pages 75--86, 2010.","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-60750-619-5-75"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. J. Log. Comput., 13(3):429--448, 2003.","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/13.3.429"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon and Paul E. Dunne. Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 171(10 - 15):619 - 641, 2007.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.05.001"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-18","unstructured":"Pierre Bisquert, Claudette Cayrol, Florence Dupin de Saint-Cyr, and Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex. Characterizing change in abstract argumentation systems. In Trends in Belief Revision and Argumentation Dynamics, volume 48, pages 75--102. 2013."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Guido Boella, Souhila Kaci, and Leendert W. N. van der Torre. Dynamics in argumentation with single extensions: Abstraction principles and the grounded extension. In Proc. of European Conf. on Symb. and Quant. Appr. to Reasoning and Uncertainty (ECSQARU), pages 107--118, 2009.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-02906-6_11"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Guido Boella, Souhila Kaci, and Leendert W. N. van der Torre. Dynamics in argumentation with single extensions: Attack refinement and the grounded extension. In Proc. of Sixth International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS), pages 150--159, 2009.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-12805-9_9"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-21","unstructured":"Claudette Cayrol, Florence Dupin de Saint-Cyr, and Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex. Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: Adding an argument. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 38:49--84, 2010."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-22","unstructured":"Federico Cerutti, Mauro Vallati, Massimiliano Giacomin, and Tobia Zanetti. ArgSemSAT-2017."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Günther Charwat, Wolfgang Dvorák, Sarah Alice Gaggl, Johannes Peter Wallner, and Stefan Woltran. Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation - A survey. Artificial Intelligence, 220:28--63, 2015.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2014.11.008"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Andrea Cohen, Sebastian Gottifredi, Alejandro Javier García, and Guillermo Ricardo Simari. A survey of different approaches to support in argumentation systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 29(5):513--550, 2014.","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888913000325"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-25","unstructured":"Sylvie Coste-Marquis, Sébastien Konieczny, Pierre Marquis, and Mohand Akli Ouali. Weighted attacks in argumentation frameworks. In KR, 2012."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Phan Minh Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77(2):321--358, 1995.","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paul E. Dunne, Anthony Hunter, Peter McBurney, Simon Parsons, and Michael Wooldridge. Weighted argument systems: Basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results. Artif. Intell., 175(2):457--486, 2011.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2010.09.005"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paul E. Dunne and Michael Wooldridge. Complexity of abstract argumentation. In Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pages 85--104. 2009.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_5"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-29","unstructured":"Wolfgang Dvorák, Reinhard Pichler, and Stefan Woltran. Towards fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for argumentation. In Proc. of European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty (ECSQARU), 2010."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Marcelo A. Falappa, Alejandro Javier Garcia, Gabriele Kern-Isberner, and Guillermo Ricardo Simari. On the evolving relation between belief revision and argumentation. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 26(1):35--43, 2011.","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888910000391"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bettina Fazzinga, Sergio Flesca, and Francesco Parisi. Efficiently estimating the probability of extensions in abstract argumentation. In Proc. of International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM), pages 106--119, 2013.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-40381-1_9"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bettina Fazzinga, Sergio Flesca, and Francesco Parisi. On the complexity of probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 16(3):22, 2015.","DOI":"10.1145\/2749463"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bettina Fazzinga, Sergio Flesca, and Francesco Parisi. On efficiently estimating the probability of extensions in abstract argumentation frameworks. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 69:106--132, 2016.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2015.11.009"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bettina Fazzinga, Sergio Flesca, Francesco Parisi, and Adriana Pietramala. PARTY: A mobile system for efficiently assessing the probability of extensions in a debate. In Proc. of International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA), pages 220--235, 2015.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-22849-5_16"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alejandro J. García and Guillermo R. Simari. Defeasible logic programming: An argumentative approach. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP), 4(1-2):95--138, 2004.","DOI":"10.1017\/S1471068403001674"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-36","unstructured":"Sergio Greco and Francesco Parisi. Efficient computation of deterministic extensions for dynamic abstract argumentation frameworks. In Proc. of European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), pages 1668--1669, 2016."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sergio Greco and Francesco Parisi. Incremental computation of deterministic extensions for dynamic argumentation frameworks. In Proc. of European Conference On Logics In Artificial Intelligence (JELIA), pages 288--304, 2016.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-48758-8_19"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sergio Greco and Francesco Parisi. Incremental computation of grounded semantics for dynamic abstract argumentation frameworks. In Proc. of 2nd Workshop on Conflict Resolution in Decision Making (COREDEMA), pages 66--81, 2016.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-57285-7_5"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-39","unstructured":"Nadin Kökciyan, Nefise Yaglikci, and Pinar Yolum. Argumentation for resolving privacy disputes in online social networks: (extended abstract). In Proc. of International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Sytems (AAMAS), pages 1361--1362, 2016."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bei Shui Liao, Li Jin, and Robert C. Koons. Dynamics of argumentation systems: A division-based method. Artificial Intelligence, 175(11):1790--1814, 2011.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2011.03.006"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sanjay Modgil. An abstract theory of argumentation that accommodates defeasible reasoning about preferences. In Proc. of European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU), pages 648--659, 2007.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-75256-1_57"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sanjay Modgil. Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks. Artif. Intell., 173(9-10):901--934, 2009.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2009.02.001"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-43","unstructured":"Sanjay Modgil, Francesca Toni, Floris Bex, Ivan Bratko, Carlos I. Chesñevar, Wolfgang DvundeCorák, Marcelo A. Falappa, Xiuyi Fan, Sarah Alice Gaggl, Alejandro J. García, Maria P. González, Thomas F. Gordon, João Leite, Martin MoundeCzina, Chris Reed, Guillermo R. Simari, Stefan Szeider, Paolo Torroni, and Stefan Woltran. Agreement Technologies, volume 8 of Law, Governance and Technology, chapter 21: The Added Value of Argumentation: Examples and Challenges, pages 357--404. Springer, 2013."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Emilia Oikarinen and Stefan Woltran. Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks. Artificial Intelligence, 175(14-15):1985--2009, 2011.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2011.06.003"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-45","unstructured":"Iyad Rahwan and Guillermo R. Simari. Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 1st edition, 2009."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-46","unstructured":"Hannes Strass and Stefan Ellmauthaler. goDIAMOND-ICCMA 2017 System Description."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Matthias Thimm, Serena Villata, Federico Cerutti, Nir Oren, Hannes Strass, and Mauro Vallati. Summary report of the first international competition on computational models of argumentation. Artificial Intelligence Magazine, 37(1):102, 2016.","DOI":"10.1609\/aimag.v37i1.2640"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Serena Villata, Guido Boella, Dov M. Gabbay, and Leendert W. N. van der Torre. Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 66(1-4):163--197, 2012.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10472-012-9317-7"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3216122.3216162-49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yuming Xu and Claudette Cayrol. The matrix approach for abstract argumentation frameworks. In Proc. of International Workshop on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation (TAFA), pages 243--259, 2015.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-28460-6_15"}],"event":{"name":"the 22nd International Database Engineering & Applications Symposium","location":"Villa San Giovanni, Italy","acronym":"IDEAS 2018","number":"22","sponsor":["Concordia University"],"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,18]]},"end":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,20]]}},"container-title":["Proceedings of the 22nd International Database Engineering & Applications Symposium on - IDEAS 2018"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3216122.3216162","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/dl.acm.org\/ft_gateway.cfm?id=3216162&ftid=1986372&dwn=1","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,5]],"date-time":"2025-07-05T17:51:47Z","timestamp":1751737907000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/dl.acm.org\/citation.cfm?doid=3216122.3216162"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018]]},"references-count":49,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3216122.3216162","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018]]}}}