{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T04:30:04Z","timestamp":1750221004577,"version":"3.41.0"},"publisher-location":"New York, New York, USA","reference-count":43,"publisher":"ACM Press","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]],"date-time":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1546300800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3351287.3351288","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,29]],"date-time":"2019-08-29T12:18:43Z","timestamp":1567081123000},"page":"1-7","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Experimenting with Model Solutions as a Support Mechanism"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"given":"Henrik","family":"Nygren","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Helsinki"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Juho","family":"Leinonen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Helsinki"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nea","family":"Pirttinen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Helsinki"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Antti","family":"Leinonen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Helsinki"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Arto","family":"Hellas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Helsinki"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","reference":[{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-1","unstructured":"Adrian A. de Freitas and Michelle M. de Freitas. 2013. Classroom Live: A software-assisted gamification tool. Computer Science Education 23 (06 2013), 186--206."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-2","unstructured":"Gabriel Barata, Sandra Gama, Joaquim Jorge, and Daniel Gonçalves. 2013. Engaging Engineering Students with Gamification. 2013 5th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications, VS-GAMES 2013, 24--31."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jens Bennedsen and Michael E. Caspersen. 2007. Failure Rates in Introductory Programming. SIGCSE Bull. 39, 2 (June 2007), 32--36. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1272848.1272879","DOI":"10.1145\/1272848.1272879"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-4","unstructured":"Allan Collins, John Seely Brown, and Ann Holum. 1991. Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American educator 15, 3 (1991), 6--11."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-5","unstructured":"Allan Collins, John Seely Brown, and Susan E Newman. 1989. Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser 18 (1989), 32--42."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-6","unstructured":"Sebastian Deterding, Miguel Sicart, Lennart Nacke, Kenton O'Hara, and Dan Dixon. 2011. Gamification. Using Game-design Elements in Non-gaming Contexts. In CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2425--2428."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-7","unstructured":"Walter Doyle. 1983. Academic work. Review of educational research 53, 2 (1983), 159--199."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-8","unstructured":"Carol S. Dweck. 1986. Motivational Processes Affecting Learning. American Psychologist (1986), 1040--1048."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"C. A. Eleftheria, P. Charikleia, C. G. Iason, T. Athanasios, and T. Dimitrios. 2013. An innovative augmented reality educational platform using Gamification to enhance lifelong learning and cultural education. In IISA 2013. 1--5.","DOI":"10.1109\/IISA.2013.6623724"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-10","unstructured":"Katherine Fu, Jonathan Cagan, and Kenneth Kotovsky. 2010. Design team convergence: the influence of example solution quality. Journal of Mechanical Design 132, 11 (2010), 111005."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-11","unstructured":"David Gibson, Nathaniel Ostashewski, Kim Flintoff, Sheryl Grant, and Erin Knight. 2015. Digital Badges in Education. Education and Information Technologies 20, 2 (2015), 403--410."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Geoff Goehle. 2013. Gamification and Web-based Homework. PRIMUS 23 (03 2013).","DOI":"10.1080\/10511970.2012.736451"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lassi Haaranen, Petri Ihantola, Lasse Hakulinen, and Ari Korhonen. 2014. How (Not) to Introduce Badges to Online Exercises. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 33--38. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2538862.2538921","DOI":"10.1145\/2538862.2538921"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-14","unstructured":"Judith Harackiewicz, Kenneth Barron, and Andrew J. Elliot. 1998. Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why? Educational Psychologist 33 (12 1998), 1--21."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-15","unstructured":"Arto Hellas, Petri Ihantola, Andrew Petersen, Vangel V Ajanovski, Mirela Gutica, Timo Hynninen, Antti Knutas, Juho Leinonen, Chris Messom, and Soohyun Nam Liao. 2018. Predicting academic performance: a systematic literature review. In Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. ACM, 175--199."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-16","unstructured":"Chris Hulleman, Sheree M Schrager, Shawn M Bodmann, and Judith Harackiewicz. 2010. A Meta-Analytic Review of Achievement Goal Measures: Different Labels for the Same Constructs or Different Constructs With Similar Labels? Psychological bulletin 136 (05 2010), 422--49."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-17","unstructured":"Petri Ihantola, Juha Sorva, and Arto Vihavainen. 2014. Automatically detectable indicators of programming assignment difficulty. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Information technology education. ACM, 33--38."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-18","unstructured":"Slava Kalyuga. 2009. The expertise reversal effect. In Managing Cognitive Load in Adaptive Multimedia Learning. IGI Global, 58--80."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-19","unstructured":"Ravinder Koul, Roy Clariana, Kalayanee Jitgarun, and Alisa Songsriwittaya. 2009. The influence of achievement goal orientation on plagiarism. Learning and Individual Differences 19 (12 2009), 506--512."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-20","unstructured":"Balraj Kumar and Parul Khurana. 2012. Gamification in Education - Learn Computer Programming with Fun. International Journal of Computers and Distributed Systems 2 (12 2012)."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-21","unstructured":"Juho Leinonen, Leo Leppänen, Petri Ihantola, and Arto Hellas. 2017. Comparison of time metrics in programming. In Proceedings of the 2017 acm conference on international computing education research. ACM, 200--208."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Leo Leppänen, Lassi Vapaakallio, and Arto Vihavainen. 2016. Illusion of Progress is Moar Addictive Than Cat Pictures. In Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 133--136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2876034.2893388","DOI":"10.1145\/2876034.2893388"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Simon, Ibrahim Albluwi, Brett A. Becker, Michail Giannakos, Amruth N. Kumar, Linda Ott, James Paterson, Michael James Scott, Judy Sheard, and Claudia Szabo. 2018. Introductory Programming: A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE 2018 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 55--106. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3293881.3295779","DOI":"10.1145\/3293881.3295779"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-24","unstructured":"Behrooz Mostafavi, Guojing Zhou, Collin Lynch, Min Chi, and Tiffany Barnes. 2015. Data-driven worked examples improve retention and completion in a logic tutor. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Springer, 726--729."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fiona Nah, Qing Zeng, Venkata Rajasekhar Telaprolu, Abhishek Padmanabhuni Ayyappa, and Brenda Eschenbrenner. 2014. Gamification of Education: A Review of Literature. 401--409.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-07293-7_39"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-26","unstructured":"Henrik Nygren, Juho Leinonen, and Arto Hellas. 2019. Non-restricted Access to Model Solutions: A Good Idea?. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. ACM, 44--50."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-27","unstructured":"Siobhan O'Donovan, James Gain, and Patrick Marais. 2013. A Case Study in the Gamification of a University-level Games Development Course. In Proceedings of the South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists Conference (SAICSIT '13). ACM, 242--251."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-28","unstructured":"Eleanor O'Rourke, Christy Ballweber, and Zoran Popovií. 2014. Hint systems may negatively impact performance in educational games. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference. ACM, 51--60."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-29","unstructured":"Corwin Senko, Chris S. Hulleman, and Judith M. Harackiewicz. 2011. Achievement Goal Theory at the Crossroads: Old Controversies, Current Challenges, and New Directions. Educational Psychologist 46, 1 (2011), 26--47."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Corwin Senko and Katie L. Tropiano. 2016. Comparing Three Models of Achievement Goals: Goal Orientations, Goal Standards, and Goal Complexes. Journal of Educational Psychology 108 (02 2016).","DOI":"10.1037\/edu0000114"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-31","unstructured":"Jaime Spacco, William Pugh, Nat Ayewah, and David Hovemeyer. 2006. The Marmoset project: an automated snapshot, submission, and testing system. In Companion to the 21st ACM SIGPLAN symposium on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications. Citeseer, 669--670."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-32","unstructured":"Kristin Stephens-Martinez and Armando Fox. 2018. Giving hints is complicated: understanding the challenges of an automated hint system based on frequent wrong answers. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. ACM, 45--50."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-33","unstructured":"John Sweller and Graham A Cooper. 1985. The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and instruction 2, 1 (1985), 59--89."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-34","unstructured":"J Gregory Trafton and Brian J Reiser. 1993. Studying examples and solving problems: Contributions to skill acquisition. In Proceedings of the 15th conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Citeseer, 1017--1022."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-35","unstructured":"Kurt VanLehn. 1998. Analogy events: How examples are used during problem solving. Cognitive Science 22, 3 (1998), 347--388."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Arto Vihavainen, Jonne Airaksinen, and Christopher Watson. 2014. A Systematic Review of Approaches for Teaching Introductory Programming and Their Influence on Success. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 19--26. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2632320.2632349","DOI":"10.1145\/2632320.2632349"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Arto Vihavainen, Matti Paksula, and Matti Luukkainen. 2011. Extreme Apprenticeship Method in Teaching Programming for Beginners. In Proceedings of the 42Nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 93--98. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1953163.1953196","DOI":"10.1145\/1953163.1953196"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Arto Vihavainen, Thomas Vikberg, Matti Luukkainen, and Jaakko Kurhila. 2013. Massive Increase in Eager TAs: Experiences from Extreme Apprenticeship-based CS1. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 123--128. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2462476.2462508","DOI":"10.1145\/2462476.2462508"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Christopher Watson and Frederick W.B. Li. 2014. Failure Rates in Introductory Programming Revisited. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 39--44. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2591708.2591749","DOI":"10.1145\/2591708.2591749"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"H Wood and D Wood. 1999. Help seeking, learning and contingent tutoring. Computers & Education 33, 2-3 (1999), 153--169.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0360-1315(99)00030-5"},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-41","unstructured":"Daniel Zingaro. 2015. Examining Interest and Grades in Computer Science 1: A Study of Pedagogy and Achievement Goals. Trans. Comput. Educ. 15, 3 (2015), 14:1--14:18."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-42","unstructured":"Daniel Zingaro, Michelle Craig, Leo Porter, Brett A Becker, Yingjun Cao, Phill Conrad, Diana Cukierman, Arto Hellas, Dastyni Loksa, and Neena Thota. 2018. Achievement Goals in CS1: Replication and Extension. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, 687--692."},{"key":"key-10.1145\/3351287.3351288-43","unstructured":"Daniel Zingaro and Leo Porter. 2016. Impact of student achievement goals on CS1 outcomes. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM technical symposium on Computing Science Education. ACM, 279--296."}],"event":{"number":"1","sponsor":["Univ of Kent at Canterbury, University of Kent at Canterbury"],"acronym":"UKICER","name":"the 1st UK & Ireland Computing Education Research Conference","start":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,5]]},"location":"Canterbury, United Kingdom","end":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,6]]}},"container-title":["Proceedings of the 1st UK & Ireland Computing Education Research Conference on   - UKICER"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3351287.3351288","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/dl.acm.org\/ft_gateway.cfm?id=3351288&ftid=2081375&dwn=1","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T00:25:51Z","timestamp":1750206351000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/dl.acm.org\/citation.cfm?doid=3351287.3351288"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"references-count":43,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3351287.3351288","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019]]}}}