{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T04:25:25Z","timestamp":1750220725717,"version":"3.41.0"},"reference-count":6,"publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,16]],"date-time":"2020-01-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1579132800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,16]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Standard Reviewing Procedures The final acceptance decision for a paper can be taken by following different alternative peer-reviewing processes (these review processes are implemented for both conferences and journals). The standard setup can be described as follows: while authors are usually not aware of the reviewers' identity (so-called blind review setting), reviewers may be aware of the authors' identity or not, resulting in single-blind or double-blind review processes, respectively. In the rare cases when the authors are aware of the reviewers' identity, the reviewing process is considered zero-blind. Other feasible alternatives are characterized by the amount of stages implemented before the acceptance decision is made (single-stage vs. multi-stage review processes) and the public visibility of review comments (open\/public vs. closed review processes). The actual process of finding agreement regarding the papers' acceptance or rejection has also a certain bandwidth, ranging from delegating the responsibility of the decision-making to few people over staged committee and board setups to organizing physical\/virtual meetings involving many people.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1145\/3375572.3375575","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,23]],"date-time":"2020-01-23T03:05:08Z","timestamp":1579748708000},"page":"12-13","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Pains and Gains of Peer-Reviewing in Software Engineering"],"prefix":"10.1145","volume":"45","author":[{"given":"Jacopo","family":"Soldani","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy"}]},{"given":"Marco","family":"Kuhrmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Passau, Passau, Germany"}]},{"given":"Dietmar","family":"Pfahl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_1_1","unstructured":"ScienceOpen. URL: https:\/\/www.scienceopen.com  ScienceOpen. URL: https:\/\/www.scienceopen.com"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","unstructured":"F1000Research. URL: https:\/\/f1000research.com  F1000Research. URL: https:\/\/f1000research.com"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","unstructured":"Claire Le Goues. \"SSBSE with Double Blind\" blog post. URL: https:\/\/www.cs.cmu.edu\/~clegoues\/double-blind.html  Claire Le Goues. \"SSBSE with Double Blind\" blog post. URL: https:\/\/www.cs.cmu.edu\/~clegoues\/double-blind.html"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","unstructured":"Robert Feldt. \"Double Blind Reviewing\" blog post. URL: http:\/\/www.robertfeldt.net\/advice\/double_blind_reviewing\/  Robert Feldt. \"Double Blind Reviewing\" blog post. URL: http:\/\/www.robertfeldt.net\/advice\/double_blind_reviewing\/"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","volume-title":"PeerJ Preprints","volume":"4","author":"Beller Moritz","year":"2016","unstructured":"Moritz Beller , Alberto Bacchelli . \"Double-blind review in software engineering venues \", PeerJ Preprints , vol. 4 , 2016 . DOI: 10.7287\/peerj.preprints.1757v2 10.7287\/peerj.preprints.1757v2 Moritz Beller, Alberto Bacchelli. \"Double-blind review in software engineering venues\", PeerJ Preprints, vol. 4, 2016. DOI: 10.7287\/peerj.preprints.1757v2"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2017.10.019"}],"container-title":["ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3375572.3375575","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3375572.3375575","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,17]],"date-time":"2025-06-17T22:38:14Z","timestamp":1750199894000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3375572.3375575"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,16]]},"references-count":6,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,16]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3375572.3375575"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3375572.3375575","relation":{},"ISSN":["0163-5948"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0163-5948"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,16]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2020-01-22","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}