{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T04:24:36Z","timestamp":1750220676369,"version":"3.41.0"},"reference-count":2,"publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,9]],"date-time":"2020-07-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1594252800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Peer review in software engineering is considered, same as for other disciplines, to be a key element of the research process, yet it is often perceived as not to work fully well. To understand the pains and gains in the peer review system, we ran a survey with open and closed questions with the authors and PC members of ICSE 2014\/2015\/2016. We received 241 responses (29% response rate). 67% of the respondents identified themselves as professors. We analyzed the responses quantitatively and qualitatively (with open coding). All questions were optional. Agreement scales had 10 points, so mild levels of agreement could be expressed but there was no undecided middle point. The resulting article appeared in Information and Software Technology in 2018 [1] and we also disclosed the anonymized data set [2].<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1145\/3402127.3402133","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,9]],"date-time":"2020-07-09T22:13:10Z","timestamp":1594332790000},"page":"16-16","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Double-blind is good but open would be better"],"prefix":"10.1145","volume":"45","author":[{"given":"Lutz","family":"Prechelt","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Freie Universit\u00e4t Berlin, Berlin, Germany"}]},{"given":"Daniel","family":"Graziotin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany"}]},{"given":"Daniel","family":"Mendez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Blekinge Institute of Technology and fortiss GmbH, Karlskrona, Sweden"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_1_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2017.10.019"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","volume-title":"Open science repository for 'on the status and future of peer review in software engineering'. figshare URL: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.6084\/m9.figshare. 5086357, doi:10.6084\/m9.figshare.5086357","author":"Prechelt L.","year":"2017","unstructured":"L. Prechelt , D. Graziotin , D. M\u00e9ndez . Open science repository for 'on the status and future of peer review in software engineering'. figshare URL: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.6084\/m9.figshare. 5086357, doi:10.6084\/m9.figshare.5086357 , 2017 . 10.6084\/m9.figshare L. Prechelt, D. Graziotin, D. M\u00e9ndez. Open science repository for 'on the status and future of peer review in software engineering'. figshare URL: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.6084\/m9.figshare. 5086357, doi:10.6084\/m9.figshare.5086357, 2017."}],"container-title":["ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3402127.3402133","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3402127.3402133","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,17]],"date-time":"2025-06-17T22:03:13Z","timestamp":1750197793000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3402127.3402133"}},"subtitle":["Perceptions of peer review in the SE community"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,9]]},"references-count":2,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3402127.3402133"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3402127.3402133","relation":{},"ISSN":["0163-5948"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0163-5948"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2020-07-09","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}