{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]],"date-time":"2026-03-10T00:20:08Z","timestamp":1773102008414,"version":"3.50.1"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":49,"publisher":"ACM","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,21]],"date-time":"2021-06-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1624233600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,21]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3462757.3466062","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,28]],"date-time":"2021-07-28T06:50:46Z","timestamp":1627455046000},"page":"12-21","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Precedential constraint"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"given":"Trevor","family":"Bench-Capon","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom"}]},{"given":"Katie","family":"Atkinson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_1_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2746090.2746103"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-016-9178-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/222092.222106"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_5_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Constrained by precedent","volume":"63","author":"Alexander Larry","year":"1989","unstructured":"Larry Alexander . 1989 . Constrained by precedent . Southern California Law Review 63 (1989), 1 -- 64 . Larry Alexander. 1989. Constrained by precedent. Southern California Law Review 63 (1989), 1--64.","journal-title":"Southern California Law Review"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_6_1","volume-title":"Modeling legal arguments: Reasoning with cases and hypotheticals","author":"Ashley Kevin D","unstructured":"Kevin D Ashley . 1990. Modeling legal arguments: Reasoning with cases and hypotheticals . MIT press , Cambridge, Mass . Kevin D Ashley. 1990. Modeling legal arguments: Reasoning with cases and hypotheticals. MIT press, Cambridge, Mass."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-009-9077-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_8_1","volume-title":"Practical legal expert systems: the relation between a formalisation of legislation and expert knowledge","author":"Bench-Capon Trevor","unstructured":"Trevor Bench-Capon . 1991. Practical legal expert systems: the relation between a formalisation of legislation and expert knowledge . In Law, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, M Bennun and A Narayanan (Eds.). Ablex , 191--201. Trevor Bench-Capon. 1991. Practical legal expert systems: the relation between a formalisation of legislation and expert knowledge. In Law, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, M Bennun and A Narayanan (Eds.). Ablex, 191--201."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/323706.323713"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-017-9201-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_11_1","volume-title":"Proceedings of CMNA 2020. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2669","author":"Bench-Capon Trevor","year":"2020","unstructured":"Trevor Bench-Capon . 2020 . Explaining Legal Decisions Using IRAC . In Proceedings of CMNA 2020. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2669 , 74--83. Trevor Bench-Capon. 2020. Explaining Legal Decisions Using IRAC. In Proceedings of CMNA 2020. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2669, 74--83."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_12_1","volume-title":"Proceeding of JURIX","author":"Bench-Capon Trevor","year":"2017","unstructured":"Trevor Bench-Capon and Katie Atkinson . 2017 . Dimensions and Values for Legal CBR . In Proceeding of JURIX 2017. 27--32. Trevor Bench-Capon and Katie Atkinson. 2017. Dimensions and Values for Legal CBR. In Proceeding of JURIX 2017. 27--32."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_13_1","volume-title":"Proceedings of JURIX","author":"Bench-Capon Trevor","year":"2018","unstructured":"Trevor Bench-Capon and Katie Atkinson . 2018 . Lessons from Implementing Factors with Magnitude . In Proceedings of JURIX 2018. 11--20. Trevor Bench-Capon and Katie Atkinson. 2018. Lessons from Implementing Factors with Magnitude. In Proceedings of JURIX 2018. 11--20."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_14_1","volume-title":"Proceedings of JURIX","author":"Bench-Capon Trevor","year":"2015","unstructured":"Trevor Bench-Capon and Floris Bex . 2015 . Cases and Stories, Dimensions and Scripts .. In Proceedings of JURIX 2015. 11--20. Trevor Bench-Capon and Floris Bex. 2015. Cases and Stories, Dimensions and Scripts.. In Proceedings of JURIX 2015. 11--20."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_15_1","volume-title":"Proceedings of JURIX","author":"Bench-Capon Trevor","year":"2001","unstructured":"Trevor Bench-Capon and Edwina L Rissland . 2001 . Back to the future: Dimensions revisited . In Proceedings of JURIX 2001. IOS Press, 41--52. Trevor Bench-Capon and Edwina L Rissland. 2001. Back to the future: Dimensions revisited. In Proceedings of JURIX 2001. IOS Press, 41--52."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(03)00108-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/112646.112664"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_18_1","volume-title":"Two-Stage Models of Legal Prediction. In The 3rd XAILA Workshop at JURIX","author":"Branting L Karl","year":"2020","unstructured":"L Karl Branting . 2020 . Explanation in Hybrid , Two-Stage Models of Legal Prediction. In The 3rd XAILA Workshop at JURIX 2020. L Karl Branting. 2020. Explanation in Hybrid, Two-Stage Models of Legal Prediction. In The 3rd XAILA Workshop at JURIX 2020."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_19_1","volume-title":"Scalable and explainable legal prediction. AI and Law","author":"Branting L Karl","year":"2020","unstructured":"L Karl Branting , Craig Pfeifer , Bradford Brown , Lisa Ferro , John Aberdeen , Brandy Weiss , Mark Pfaff , and Bill Liao . 2020. Scalable and explainable legal prediction. AI and Law ( 2020 ), 1--26. L Karl Branting, Craig Pfeifer, Bradford Brown, Lisa Ferro, John Aberdeen, Brandy Weiss, Mark Pfaff, and Bill Liao. 2020. Scalable and explainable legal prediction. AI and Law (2020), 1--26."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_20_1","volume-title":"Proceedings of Jurix","author":"Br\u00fcninghaus Stefanie","year":"2003","unstructured":"Stefanie Br\u00fcninghaus and Kevin Ashley . 2003 . A predictive role for intermediate legal concepts . In Proceedings of Jurix 2003. 153--62. Stefanie Br\u00fcninghaus and Kevin Ashley. 2003. A predictive role for intermediate legal concepts. In Proceedings of Jurix 2003. 153--62."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/1047788.1047838"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5555\/2698634.2698988"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_23_1","volume-title":"Proceedings of COMMA","author":"Gordon Thomas F","year":"2016","unstructured":"Thomas F Gordon and Douglas Walton . 2016 . Formalizing Balancing Arguments .. In Proceedings of COMMA 2016. 327--338. Thomas F Gordon and Douglas Walton. 2016. Formalizing Balancing Arguments.. In Proceedings of COMMA 2016. 327--338."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3086512.3086521"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3322640.3326697"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2018358.2018363"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3086512.3086523"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-019-09245-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_29_1","volume-title":"Modifying the Reason Model. AI and Law","author":"Horty John F","year":"2021","unstructured":"John F Horty . 2021. Modifying the Reason Model. AI and Law ( 2021 ), On Line . John F Horty. 2021. Modifying the Reason Model. AI and Law (2021), On Line."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9125-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S1352325205050019"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-015-9163-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_33_1","volume-title":"Proceedings of JURIX","author":"Lindahl Lars","year":"2006","unstructured":"Lars Lindahl and Jan Odelstad . 2006 . Open and closed intermediaries in normative systems . In Proceedings of JURIX 2006. IOS Press, 91--99. Lars Lindahl and Jan Odelstad. 2006. Open and closed intermediaries in normative systems. In Proceedings of JURIX 2006. IOS Press, 91--99."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/1599508"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_35_1","volume-title":"Using machine learning to predict decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. AI and Law","author":"Medvedeva Masha","year":"2019","unstructured":"Masha Medvedeva , Michel Vols , and Martijn Wieling . 2019. Using machine learning to predict decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. AI and Law ( 2019 ), 1--30. Masha Medvedeva, Michel Vols, and Martijn Wieling. 2019. Using machine learning to predict decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. AI and Law (2019), 1--30."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3322640.3326703"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_37_1","volume-title":"A A formal analysis of some factor- and precedent-based accounts of precedential constraint. AI and Law","author":"Prakken Henry","year":"2021","unstructured":"Henry Prakken . 2021. A A formal analysis of some factor- and precedent-based accounts of precedential constraint. AI and Law ( 2021 ), Available On-Line . Henry Prakken. 2021. A A formal analysis of some factor- and precedent-based accounts of precedential constraint. AI and Law (2021), Available On-Line."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_38_1","volume-title":"A top-level model of case-based argumentation for explanation: formalisation and experiments. Argument and Computation","author":"Prakken Henry","year":"2021","unstructured":"Henry Prakken and Ratsma Rosa . 2021. A top-level model of case-based argumentation for explanation: formalisation and experiments. Argument and Computation ( 2021 ), Available On-line . Henry Prakken and Ratsma Rosa. 2021. A top-level model of case-based argumentation for explanation: formalisation and experiments. Argument and Computation (2021), Available On-line."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_39_1","first-page":"3","article-title":"Modelling reasoning with precedents in a formal dialogue game","volume":"6","author":"Prakken Henry","year":"1998","unstructured":"Henry Prakken and Giovanni Sartor . 1998 . Modelling reasoning with precedents in a formal dialogue game . AI and Law 6 , 3 -- 4 (1998), 231--87. Henry Prakken and Giovanni Sartor. 1998. Modelling reasoning with precedents in a formal dialogue game. AI and Law 6, 3--4 (1998), 231--87.","journal-title":"AI and Law"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/ext010"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_41_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-015-9166-x"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-017-9216-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_43_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/41735.41743"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_44_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1019544429704"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_45_1","volume-title":"Harvard Law Review","author":"Ross Alf","year":"1957","unstructured":"Alf Ross . 1957. T\u00fb-t\u00fb. Harvard Law Review ( 1957 ), 812--825. Alf Ross. 1957. T\u00fb-t\u00fb. Harvard Law Review (1957), 812--825."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_46_1","volume-title":"Stanford Law Review","author":"Schauer Frederick","year":"1987","unstructured":"Frederick Schauer . 1987. Precedent. Stanford Law Review ( 1987 ), 571--605. Frederick Schauer. 1987. Precedent. Stanford Law Review (1987), 571--605."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_47_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/5689.5920"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_48_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00118477"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_49_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/74014.74018"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_50_1","volume-title":"Proceedings of COMMA","author":"Zheng Heng","year":"2020","unstructured":"Heng Zheng , Davide Grossi , and Bart Verheij . 2020 . Case-Based Reasoning with Precedent Models: Preliminary Report . In Proceedings of COMMA 2020. 443--450. Heng Zheng, Davide Grossi, and Bart Verheij. 2020. Case-Based Reasoning with Precedent Models: Preliminary Report. In Proceedings of COMMA 2020. 443--450."}],"event":{"name":"ICAIL '21: Eighteenth International Conference for Artificial Intelligence and Law","location":"S\u00e3o Paulo Brazil","acronym":"ICAIL '21","sponsor":["SIGAI ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence"]},"container-title":["Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3462757.3466062","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3462757.3466062","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,17]],"date-time":"2025-06-17T21:28:31Z","timestamp":1750195711000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3462757.3466062"}},"subtitle":["the role of issues"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,21]]},"references-count":49,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3462757.3466062","10.1145\/3462757"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3462757.3466062","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2021-07-27","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}