{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T04:22:40Z","timestamp":1750220560666,"version":"3.41.0"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":21,"publisher":"ACM","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,21]],"date-time":"2021-06-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1624233600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"funder":[{"name":"Agencia Estatal de Investigaci\u00f3n","award":["DER2017-88501-P"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["DER2017-88501-P"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,21]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3462757.3466077","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,28]],"date-time":"2021-07-28T06:50:46Z","timestamp":1627455046000},"page":"195-199","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Making intelligent online dispute resolution tools available to self-represented litigants in the public justice system"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"given":"Fernando Esteban","family":"de la Rosa","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Granada, Granada, Spain"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"John","family":"Zeleznikow","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"La Trobe University Law School, Melbourne, Australia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_1_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-006-9013-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_2_1","article-title":"When Accessing Justice Requires Absence from the Courthouse: Utah's Online Dispute Resolution Program and the Impact it Will Have on Pro Se Litigants","volume":"21","author":"Dardanes Julianne","year":"2021","unstructured":"Julianne Dardanes . 2021 . When Accessing Justice Requires Absence from the Courthouse: Utah's Online Dispute Resolution Program and the Impact it Will Have on Pro Se Litigants . Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 21 , 1 (2021). Julianne Dardanes. 2021. When Accessing Justice Requires Absence from the Courthouse: Utah's Online Dispute Resolution Program and the Impact it Will Have on Pro Se Litigants. Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 21, 1 (2021).","journal-title":"Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal"},{"volume-title":"Family Court of Australia.","author":"Dewar John","key":"e_1_3_2_1_3_1","unstructured":"John Dewar , Barry W. Smith , and Cate Banks . 2000. Litigants in Person in the Family Court of Australia - Research Report No 20 , Family Court of Australia. Vol. Research Report No 20 . Family Court of Australia Canberra . John Dewar, Barry W. Smith, and Cate Banks. 2000. Litigants in Person in the Family Court of Australia - Research Report No 20, Family Court of Australia. Vol. Research Report No 20. Family Court of Australia Canberra."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_4_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Recent Development of Internet Courts in China","volume":"5","author":"Fang Xuhui","year":"2018","unstructured":"Xuhui Fang . 2018 . Recent Development of Internet Courts in China . International Journal on Online Dispute Resolution 5 (2018), 1 -- 2 , 49--55. Xuhui Fang. 2018. Recent Development of Internet Courts in China. International Journal on Online Dispute Resolution 5 (2018), 1--2, 49--55.","journal-title":"International Journal on Online Dispute Resolution"},{"volume-title":"Getting to yes","author":"Fisher Roger","key":"e_1_3_2_1_5_1","unstructured":"Roger Fisher and William Ury . 1981. Getting to yes . Penguin Group , New York . Roger Fisher and William Ury. 1981. Getting to yes. Penguin Group, New York."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_6_1","unstructured":"Hazel Genn and Yvette Genn. 1989. The effectiveness of representation at tribunals. Lord Chancellor's Department.  Hazel Genn and Yvette Genn. 1989. The effectiveness of representation at tribunals. Lord Chancellor's Department."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_7_1","volume-title":"The growing challenge of pro se litigation. 13 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 439","author":"Landsman Stephan","year":"2009","unstructured":"Stephan Landsman . 2009. The growing challenge of pro se litigation. 13 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 439 ( 2009 ). Stephan Landsman. 2009. The growing challenge of pro se litigation. 13 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 439 (2009)."},{"volume-title":"Enhanced dispute resolution through the use of information technology","author":"Lodder Arno","key":"e_1_3_2_1_8_1","unstructured":"Arno Lodder and John Zeleznikow . 2010. Enhanced dispute resolution through the use of information technology . Cambridge University Press . Arno Lodder and John Zeleznikow. 2010. Enhanced dispute resolution through the use of information technology. Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/795824"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_10_1","unstructured":"Eric Niiler. 2019. Can AI be a Fair Judge in Court? Estonia Thinks So. https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/can-ai-be-fair-judge-court-estonia-thinks-so\/  Eric Niiler. 2019. Can AI be a Fair Judge in Court? Estonia Thinks So. https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/can-ai-be-fair-judge-court-estonia-thinks-so\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_11_1","first-page":"113","article-title":"Public-Centred Civil Justice Redesign: A Case Study of the British Columbia Civil Resolution Tribunal","volume":"3","author":"Salter Shannon","year":"2016","unstructured":"Shannon Salter and Darin Thompson . 2016 . Public-Centred Civil Justice Redesign: A Case Study of the British Columbia Civil Resolution Tribunal \". McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution 3 (2016), 113 . Shannon Salter and Darin Thompson. 2016. Public-Centred Civil Justice Redesign: A Case Study of the British Columbia Civil Resolution Tribunal\". McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution 3 (2016), 113.","journal-title":"McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.53637\/ZGUX2213"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_13_1","volume-title":"A hybrid rule-neural approach for the automation of legal reasoning in the discretionary domain of family law in Australia. Artificial intelligence and Law 7, 2--3","author":"Stranieri Andrew","year":"1999","unstructured":"Andrew Stranieri , John Zeleznikow , Mark Gawler , and Bryn Lewis . 1999. A hybrid rule-neural approach for the automation of legal reasoning in the discretionary domain of family law in Australia. Artificial intelligence and Law 7, 2--3 ( 1999 ). Andrew Stranieri, John Zeleznikow, Mark Gawler, and Bryn Lewis. 1999. A hybrid rule-neural approach for the automation of legal reasoning in the discretionary domain of family law in Australia. Artificial intelligence and Law 7, 2--3 (1999)."},{"volume-title":"Online courts and the future of justice","author":"Susskind Richard E.","key":"e_1_3_2_1_14_1","unstructured":"Richard E. Susskind . 2019. Online courts and the future of justice . Oxford University Press . Richard E. Susskind. 2019. Online courts and the future of justice. Oxford University Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5553\/IJODR\/235250102015002001002"},{"volume-title":"The Uses of Argument","author":"Toulmin S.","key":"e_1_3_2_1_16_1","unstructured":"S. Toulmin . 1958. The Uses of Argument . Cambridge University Press , Cambridge . S. Toulmin. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_17_1","volume-title":"The Algorithmic Divide and Equality in the Age of Artificial Intelligence, 72 FLA. L. REV 331","author":"Peter K. Yu.","year":"2020","unstructured":"Peter K. Yu. 2020. The Algorithmic Divide and Equality in the Age of Artificial Intelligence, 72 FLA. L. REV 331 ( 2020 ). Peter K. Yu. 2020. The Algorithmic Divide and Equality in the Age of Artificial Intelligence, 72 FLA. L. REV 331 (2020)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-2230.12412"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_19_1","volume-title":"Using Web-based Legal Decision Support Systems to Improve Access to. Justice Information and Communications Technology Law 11, 1","author":"Zeleznikow J.","year":"2002","unstructured":"J. Zeleznikow . 2002. Using Web-based Legal Decision Support Systems to Improve Access to. Justice Information and Communications Technology Law 11, 1 ( 2002 ). J. Zeleznikow. 2002. Using Web-based Legal Decision Support Systems to Improve Access to. Justice Information and Communications Technology Law 11, 1 (2002)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_20_1","volume-title":"The challenges of using Online Dispute Resolution to support Self Represented Litigants. Journal of Internet Law 3 23, 7","author":"Zeleznikow John","year":"2020","unstructured":"John Zeleznikow . 2020. The challenges of using Online Dispute Resolution to support Self Represented Litigants. Journal of Internet Law 3 23, 7 ( 2020 ). John Zeleznikow. 2020. The challenges of using Online Dispute Resolution to support Self Represented Litigants. Journal of Internet Law 3 23, 7 (2020)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10726-021-09734-1"}],"event":{"name":"ICAIL '21: Eighteenth International Conference for Artificial Intelligence and Law","sponsor":["SIGAI ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence"],"location":"S\u00e3o Paulo Brazil","acronym":"ICAIL '21"},"container-title":["Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3462757.3466077","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3462757.3466077","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,17]],"date-time":"2025-06-17T21:28:31Z","timestamp":1750195711000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3462757.3466077"}},"subtitle":["towards and ethical use of the ai technology in the administration of justice"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,21]]},"references-count":21,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3462757.3466077","10.1145\/3462757"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3462757.3466077","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2021-07-27","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}