{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,2]],"date-time":"2026-01-02T07:40:43Z","timestamp":1767339643853,"version":"3.44.0"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":55,"publisher":"ACM","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,12]],"date-time":"2021-10-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1633996800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100002252","name":"NEC Foundation of America","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100002252","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,12]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3472714.3473647","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,12]],"date-time":"2021-10-12T20:47:22Z","timestamp":1634071642000},"page":"240-246","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Facial Recognition UX*"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"given":"Aimee","family":"Roundtree","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Texas State University, United States"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_1_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1050651908329562"},{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_3_2_1_2_1","first-page":"611","article-title":"Collaborative partnerships: Academia and industry working together","volume":"42","author":"Bosley D. S.","year":"1995","unstructured":"Bosley, D. S. 1995. Collaborative partnerships: Academia and industry working together. Technical Communication, 42, 4, 611-619.","journal-title":"Technical Communication"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/ProComm.2018.00042"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_4_1","first-page":"203","volume-title":"Can we be partners? Industry\/corporate advisory boards for academic, technical communication programs","author":"Yee C.","unstructured":"Yee, C. 2020. Can we be partners? Industry\/corporate advisory boards for academic, technical communication programs. In Publications management: Essays for professional communicators (pp. 203-211). Routledge."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_5_1","unstructured":"Harvard University. 2021. Gift vs. Grant. https:\/\/research.fas.harvard.edu\/policies\/gift-vs-grant"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_6_1","unstructured":"Harvard University. 2021. Gift vs. Sponsored Research Policy. https:\/\/osp.finance.harvard.edu\/gift-vs-sponsored-research-policy"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_7_1","unstructured":"The University of Houston. 2021. Sponsored Project or Gift? https:\/\/uh.edu\/research\/sponsored-projects\/proc-pol-guide\/projects-gifts\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_8_1","unstructured":"NYU. 2021. Distinguishing Between Gifts and Sponsored Awards. https:\/\/www.nyu.edu\/about\/policies-guidelines-compliance\/policies-and-guidelines\/distinguishing-between-gifts-and-sponsored-research.html"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_9_1","unstructured":"Stanford University. 2021. hard to differentiate. Gift vs. Sponsored Projects and Distinctions from Other Forms of Funding. https:\/\/doresearch.stanford.edu\/policies\/research-policy-handbook\/definitions-and-types-agreements\/gift-vs-sponsored-projects-and-distinctions-other-forms-funding"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_10_1","unstructured":"UCI. 2021. Gift vs. Grant. https:\/\/www.research.uci.edu\/sponsored-projects\/gift-vs-grant\/index.html"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_11_1","unstructured":"Carnegie Mellon. 2021. Gift vs. Grant. https:\/\/www.cmu.edu\/osp\/contracts\/contracts-process\/negotiate\/giftandgrant.html"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.36961\/si16360"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_13_1","unstructured":"UC Berkeley. 2009. UC Berkeley Guidance for Companies. https:\/\/bit.ly\/3wpItF9"},{"volume-title":"a review","author":"Sampat B. N.","key":"e_1_3_2_1_14_1","unstructured":"Sampat, B. N., & Azoulay, P. 2011) The impact of publicly funded biomedical and health research: a review. Department of Health Policy and Management, Columbia University."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.2014.2107"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_16_1","volume-title":"Private R&D","author":"Atkinson R.","year":"2020","unstructured":"Atkinson, R. 2020. Debunking the Myth That Federal R&D Investment \u201cCrowds Out\u201d Private R&D. Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. https:\/\/itif.org\/publications\/2020\/08\/25\/debunking-myth-federal-rd-investment-crowds-out-private-rd"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Abdalla M. & Abdalla M. 2020. The Grey Hoodie Project: Big Tobacco Big Tech and the threat on academic integrity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.13676.","DOI":"10.1145\/3461702.3462563"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0236166"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mitchell A. P. Basch E. M. & Dusetzina S. B. 2016. Financial relationships with industry among national comprehensive cancer network guideline authors. JAMA oncology 2 12 1628-1631.","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaoncol.2016.2710"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/02699931.2015.1049124"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/02564602.2015.1117403"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1166\/asl.2017.10426"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Unar J. A. Seng W. C. & Abbasi A. 2014. A review of biometric technology along with trends and prospects. Pattern recognition 47 8 2673-2688.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.patcog.2014.01.016"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1687-5281-2014-34"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_25_1","first-page":"77392","volume-title":"Third International Conference, HCI-CPT 2021, Held as Part of the 23rd HCI International Conference, HCII 2021, Virtual Event, July 24\u201329, 2021, Proceedings. DOI 10","author":"Roundtree A.","year":"2021","unstructured":"Roundtree, A. 2021. Testing Facial Recognition Software for Young Adults and Adolescents: An Integrative Review. In HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy, and Trust. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12788. Third International Conference, HCI-CPT 2021, Held as Part of the 23rd HCI International Conference, HCII 2021, Virtual Event, July 24\u201329, 2021, Proceedings. DOI 10.1007\/978-3-030-77392-2"},{"volume-title":"Ongoing face recognition vendor test (frvt) part 1: Verification","author":"Grother P.","key":"e_1_3_2_1_26_1","unstructured":"Grother, P., Ngan, M., & Hanaoka, K. 2018. Ongoing face recognition vendor test (frvt) part 1: Verification. National Institute of Standards and Technology."},{"volume-title":"Face recognition vendor test (FRVT) part 2: identification. U.S. Department of Commerce","author":"Grother P.","key":"e_1_3_2_1_27_1","unstructured":"Grother, P., Grother, P., Ngan, M., & Hanaoka, K. 2019. Face recognition vendor test (FRVT) part 2: identification. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology."},{"volume-title":"Face recognition vendor test (frvt) part 4: Morph-performance of automated face morph detection. U.S. Department of Commerce","author":"Ngan M.","key":"e_1_3_2_1_28_1","unstructured":"Ngan, M., Ngan, M., Grother, P., Hanaoka, K., & Kuo, J. 2020. Face recognition vendor test (frvt) part 4: Morph-performance of automated face morph detection. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ngan M. L. Grother P. J. & Hanaoka K. K. 2020. Ongoing face recognition vendor test (FRVT) Part 6A: Face recognition accuracy with masks using pre-COVID-19 algorithms.","DOI":"10.6028\/NIST.IR.8311"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_30_1","volume-title":"Ethics and Facial Recognition Technology: An Integrative Review. In 2021 3rd World Symposium on Artificial Intelligence (WSAI). 10-19","author":"Roundtree A.","year":"2020","unstructured":"Roundtree, A. 2020. Ethics and Facial Recognition Technology: An Integrative Review. In 2021 3rd World Symposium on Artificial Intelligence (WSAI). 10-19. IEEE."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_31_1","unstructured":"Slate. 2020. Was This Google Ethicist Fired for Doing Her Job? What Next TBD. https:\/\/slate.com\/podcasts\/what-next-tbd\/2020\/12\/timnit-gebru-google-ethical-ai"},{"volume-title":"\u2018This is bigger than just Timnit\u2019: How Google tried to silence a critic and ignited a movement","author":"Schwab K.","key":"e_1_3_2_1_32_1","unstructured":"Schwab, K. 2021. \u2018This is bigger than just Timnit\u2019: How Google tried to silence a critic and ignited a movement. Fast Company. https:\/\/www.fastcompany.com\/90608471\/timnit-gebru-google-ai-ethics-equitable-tech-movement"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_33_1","unstructured":"Vincent J. 2021. Google is poisoning its reputation with A.I. researchers. The Verge. https:\/\/www.theverge.com\/2021\/4\/13\/22370158\/google-ai-ethics-timnit-gebru-margaret-mitchell-firing-reputation"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_34_1","unstructured":"Grant N. Bass D. & Eidelson J. 2021. Google Turmoil Exposes Cracks Long in Making for Top A.I. Watchdog. Bloomberg Technology. https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/articles\/2021-04-21\/google-ethical-ai-group-s-turmoil-began-long-before-public-unraveling"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_35_1","unstructured":"Daws R. 2021. Google is leaking A.I. talent following ethicist's controversial firing. A.I. News. https:\/\/artificialintelligence-news.com\/2021\/02\/05\/google-leaking-ai-talent-following-ethicist-controversial-firing\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_36_1","unstructured":"Hao K. 2020. We read the paper that forced Timnit Gebru out of Google. Here's what it says. MIT Technology Review. https:\/\/www.technologyreview.com\/2020\/12\/04\/1013294\/google-ai-ethics-research-paper-forced-out-timnit-gebru\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_37_1","unstructured":"Dickey M.R. 2021. Google fires top A.I. ethics researcher Margaret Mitchell. TechCrunch. https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2021\/02\/19\/google-fires-top-ai-ethics-researcher-margaret-mitchell\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_38_1","unstructured":"Osborne C. 2021. Google fires top ethical A.I. expert Margaret Mitchell. ZDNet. https:\/\/www.zdnet.com\/article\/google-fires-top-ethical-ai-expert-margaret-mitchell\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_39_1","unstructured":"Schiffer Z. 2021. Google fires second A.I. ethics researcher following an internal investigation. The Verge. https:\/\/www.theverge.com\/2021\/2\/19\/22292011\/google-second-ethical-ai-researcher-fired"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_40_1","unstructured":"Langley H. 2021. Google says it is investigating an A.I. ethicist for sharing sensitive documents amid bristling tensions between employees and leadership. Business Insider. https:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/google-says-it-is-investigatin-ai-ethicist-margaret-mitchell-2021-1?render-embed=video"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_41_1","unstructured":"Fried I. 2021. Scoop: Google is investigating the actions of another top A.I. ethicist. Axios. https:\/\/www.axios.com\/scoop-google-is-investigating-the-actions-of-another-top-ai-ethicist-50030739-ea3d-4ea2-b452-c228b4fc9773.html"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_42_1","volume-title":"Scoop: Google CEO pledges to investigate exit of top A.I. ethicist. Axios. https:\/\/www.axios.com\/sundar-pichai-memo-timnit-gebru-exit-18b0efb0-5bc3-41e6-ac28-2956732ed78b.html","author":"Fried I.","year":"2020","unstructured":"Fried, I. 2020. Scoop: Google CEO pledges to investigate exit of top A.I. ethicist. Axios. https:\/\/www.axios.com\/sundar-pichai-memo-timnit-gebru-exit-18b0efb0-5bc3-41e6-ac28-2956732ed78b.html"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_43_1","unstructured":"Simonite T. 2021. A Second A.I. Researcher Says She Was Fired by Google. Wired. https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/second-ai-researcher-says-fired-google\/"},{"volume-title":"Google fires second A.I. ethics leader as the dispute over research, diversity grows","author":"Dave P.","key":"e_1_3_2_1_44_1","unstructured":"Dave, P. & Dastin, J. 2021. Google fires second A.I. ethics leader as the dispute over research, diversity grows. Reuters. https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/us-alphabet-google-research-idCAKBN2AJ2JA"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_45_1","unstructured":"Dean J. 2021. About Google's approach to research publication. https:\/\/bit.ly\/3fka0SO"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_46_1","unstructured":"Dean J. 2020. On the Firing of Dr. Timnit Gebru. https:\/\/bit.ly\/3hR7vsM"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_47_1","unstructured":"Fried I. 2020. Tech research becomes hazardous ground. Axios. https:\/\/www.axios.com\/google-timnit-gebru-tech-research-hazardous-ground-c20ebf78-d15e-45f2-985d-fac1c4be2eec.html"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_48_1","unstructured":"Moon M. 2021. Google engineers leave the company over the controversial exit of top A.I. ethicist. Endgadget. https:\/\/www.engadget.com\/google-engineers-leave-over-timnit-gebru-exit-093645678.html"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_49_1","unstructured":"Medium. 2021. Standing with Dr. Timnit Gebru \u2014 #ISupportTimnit #BelieveBlackWomen. Google Walkout For Real Change. https:\/\/googlewalkout.medium.com\/standing-with-dr-timnit-gebru-isupporttimnit-believeblackwomen-6dadc300d382"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_50_1","unstructured":"Dickey M.R. 2021. Google has a new responsible A.I. lead. TechCrunch. https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2021\/02\/18\/google-has-a-new-responsible-ai-lead\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_51_1","unstructured":"Johnson K. 2021. Google's new A.I. ethics lead calls for more 'diplomatic' conversation. Venture Beat. https:\/\/venturebeat.com\/2021\/02\/18\/googles-new-ai-ethics-lead-calls-for-more-diplomatic-conversation\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_52_1","unstructured":"Moghadam S.H. 2021. Marian Croak's vision for responsible A.I. at Google. Google Blog. https:\/\/blog.google\/technology\/ai\/marian-croak-responsible-ai\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_53_1","unstructured":"Fried I. 2021. Google tweaks diversity research policies following inquiry. Axios. https:\/\/bit.ly\/3bQvGUu"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_54_1","unstructured":"Kolakowski N. 2020. Google CEO Sundar Pichai Apologizes Following A.I. Expert's Departure. Dice. https:\/\/insights.dice.com\/2020\/12\/11\/google-ceo-sundar-pichai-apologizes-following-a-i-experts-departure\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_55_1","unstructured":"Holt K. 2020. Google will investigate the controversial exit of a top A.I. ethicist. Endgadget. https:\/\/www.engadget.com\/google-sundar-pichai-timnit-gebru-ai-ethics-204137362.html"}],"event":{"name":"SIGDOC '21: The 39th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication","sponsor":["SIGDOC ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communications"],"location":"Virtual Event USA","acronym":"SIGDOC '21"},"container-title":["Proceedings of the 39th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3472714.3473647","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3472714.3473647","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,10]],"date-time":"2025-09-10T22:29:16Z","timestamp":1757543356000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3472714.3473647"}},"subtitle":["A Case Study of Industry-Academic Partnerships to Promote User-Centered Ethics in Facial Recognition"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,12]]},"references-count":55,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3472714.3473647","10.1145\/3472714"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3472714.3473647","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2021-10-12","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}