{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,18]],"date-time":"2025-12-18T19:58:38Z","timestamp":1766087918752,"version":"3.41.0"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":105,"publisher":"ACM","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,20]],"date-time":"2022-06-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1655683200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000001","name":"NSF (National Science Foundation)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["DGE1745016"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["DGE1745016"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000001","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,21]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3531146.3533104","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,20]],"date-time":"2022-06-20T14:27:10Z","timestamp":1655735230000},"page":"366-378","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Flipping the Script on Criminal Justice Risk Assessment: An actuarial model for assessing the risk the federal sentencing system poses to defendants"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"given":"Mikaela","family":"Meyer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Statistics & Data Science and Heinz College, Carnegie Mellon University, USA"}]},{"given":"Aaron","family":"Horowitz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"American Civil Liberties Union, USA"}]},{"given":"Erica","family":"Marshall","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Idaho Justice Project, USA"}]},{"given":"Kristian","family":"Lum","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, USA"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_1_1","unstructured":"[1] United States v.\u00a0Salerno 481 U.S.\u00a0739.1987. https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/supremecourt\/text\/481\/739"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anna Alexandrova and Mark Fabian. 2021. Democratising Measurement: or Why Thick Concepts Call for Coproduction. European Journal for Philosophy of Science(2021).","DOI":"10.1007\/s13194-021-00437-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_3_1","volume-title":"It\u2019s COMPASlicated: The Messy Relationship between RAI Datasets and Algorithmic Fairness Benchmarks. (June","author":"Bao Michelle","year":"2021","unstructured":"Michelle Bao, Angela Zhou, Samantha Zottola, Brian Brubach, Sarah Desmarais, Aaron Horowitz, Kristian Lum, and Suresh Venkatasubramanian. 2021. It\u2019s COMPASlicated: The Messy Relationship between RAI Datasets and Algorithmic Fairness Benchmarks. (June 2021). arxiv:2106.05498"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2095230"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0093854808326545"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10940-007-9024-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_7_1","volume-title":"Making Sense of Pretrial Risk Assessments. The Champion","author":"Buskey Brandon","year":"2018","unstructured":"Brandon Buskey and Andrea Woods. 2018. Making Sense of Pretrial Risk Assessments. The Champion, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (2018)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_8_1","unstructured":"Maria-Veronica Ciocanel Chad\u00a0M Topaz Rebecca Santorella Shilad Sen Christian\u00a0Michael Smith and Adam Hufstetler. 2020. JUSTFAIR Data Dictionary. (2020). https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/1I3U9sLIwYIzPthe5t6Uq_GM24IOxSVlk\/view"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_9_1","volume-title":"JUSTFAIR: Judicial System Transparency through Federal Archive Inferred Records. Plos one 15, 10","author":"Ciocanel Maria-Veronica","year":"2020","unstructured":"Maria-Veronica Ciocanel, Chad\u00a0M Topaz, Rebecca Santorella, Shilad Sen, Christian\u00a0Michael Smith, and Adam Hufstetler. 2020. JUSTFAIR: Judicial System Transparency through Federal Archive Inferred Records. Plos one 15, 10 (2020)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1257\/pol.20170329"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9781119184256.ch4"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S1816383117000704"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_13_1","volume-title":"Proposed Amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines. (Dec","author":"U.S.\u00a0Sentencing Commission","year":"2016","unstructured":"U.S.\u00a0Sentencing Commission. 2016. Proposed Amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines. (Dec. 2016)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_14_1","volume-title":"Amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines. (April","author":"U.S.\u00a0Sentencing Commission","year":"2018","unstructured":"U.S.\u00a0Sentencing Commission. 2018. Amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines. (April 2018)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_15_1","volume-title":"Variable Codebook for Individual Offenders: Standardized Research Data Documentation for Fiscal Years 1999 -","author":"U.S.\u00a0Sentencing Commission","year":"2019","unstructured":"U.S.\u00a0Sentencing Commission. 2020. Variable Codebook for Individual Offenders: Standardized Research Data Documentation for Fiscal Years 1999 - 2019. (April 2020)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_16_1","volume-title":"Federal Judicial Caseload Statistics","author":"United","year":"2019","unstructured":"United\u00a0States Courts. 2019. Federal Judicial Caseload Statistics 2019. https:\/\/www.uscourts.gov\/statistics-reports\/federal-judicial-caseload-statistics-2019"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_17_1","unstructured":"Crimes and Criminal Procedure. 1948. 18 U.S.C. \u00a7\u2014."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Matthew DeMichele Peter Baumgartner Michael Wenger Kelle Barrick Megan Comfort and Shilpi Misra. 2018. The Public Safety Assessment: A Re-Validation and Assessment of Predictive Utility and Differential Prediction by Race and Gender in Kentucky. https:\/\/craftmediabucket.s3.amazonaws.com\/uploads\/PDFs\/3-Predictive-Utility-Study.pdf","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3168452"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_19_1","first-page":"3","article-title":"Performance of Recidivism Risk Assessment Instruments in U.S","volume":"13","author":"Desmarais L.","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sarah\u00a0L. Desmarais, Kiersten\u00a0L. Johnson, and Jay\u00a0P. Singh. 2016. Performance of Recidivism Risk Assessment Instruments in U.S. Correctional Settings. Psychological Services 13, 3 (Aug. 2016), 206\u2013222.","journal-title":"Correctional Settings. Psychological Services"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_20_1","volume-title":"Risk Assessment Instruments Validated and Implemented in Correctional Settings in the United States","author":"Desmarais L.","year":"2013","unstructured":"Sarah\u00a0L. Desmarais and Jay\u00a0P. Singh. 2013. Risk Assessment Instruments Validated and Implemented in Correctional Settings in the United States. Lexington, KY: Council of State Governments(2013)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0093854820932959"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_23_1","volume-title":"Justice denied: The harmful and lasting effects of pretrial detention. Vera Evidence Brief","author":"Digard L\u00e9on","year":"2019","unstructured":"L\u00e9on Digard and Elizabeth Swavola. 2019. Justice denied: The harmful and lasting effects of pretrial detention. Vera Evidence Brief. New York: Vera Institute of Justice (2019)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_24_1","volume-title":"Hard Choices in Artificial Intelligence: Addressing Normative Uncertainty through Sociotechnical Commitments. (Nov","author":"Dobbe Roel","year":"2019","unstructured":"Roel Dobbe, Thomas\u00a0Krendl Gilbert, and Yonatan Mintz. 2019. Hard Choices in Artificial Intelligence: Addressing Normative Uncertainty through Sociotechnical Commitments. (Nov. 2019). arxiv:1911.09005"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_25_1","volume-title":"Offenses\u00a0Involving Drugsand Narco-Terrorism","author":"Conduct Offense","year":"2021","unstructured":"Offense Conduct: Offenses\u00a0Involving Drugsand Narco-Terrorism. 2021. U.S.S.G. \u00a72D. https:\/\/www.ussc.gov\/guidelines\/2021-guidelines-manual\/annotated-2021-chapter-2-d."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.31234\/osf.io\/9zn6m"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_27_1","volume-title":"International Conference on Machine Learning.","author":"Flach A.","year":"2011","unstructured":"Peter\u00a0A. Flach, Jos\u00e9 Hern\u00e1ndez-Orallo, and C\u00e8sar\u00a0Ferri Ramirez. 2011. A coherent interpretation of AUC as a measure of aggregated classification performance. In International Conference on Machine Learning."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_28_1","volume-title":"Flanagan and Kathleen Maguire","author":"J.","year":"1990","unstructured":"Timothy\u00a0J. Flanagan and Kathleen Maguire. 1990. Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics 1989. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_29_1","unstructured":"Anthony\u00a0W. Flores Kristin Bechtel and Christopher\u00a0T. Lowenkamp. 2016. False Positives False Negatives and False Analyses: A rejoinder to Machine Bias: There\u2019s software used across the country to predict future criminals. and it\u2019s biased against blacks. Federal. Probation 80(2016)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_30_1","volume-title":"On the Validity of Arrest as a Proxy for Offense: Race and the Likelihood of Arrest for Violent Crimes. (May","author":"Fogliato Riccardo","year":"2021","unstructured":"Riccardo Fogliato, Alice Xiang, Zachary Lipton, Daniel Nagin, and Alexandra Chouldechova. 2021. On the Validity of Arrest as a Proxy for Offense: Race and the Likelihood of Arrest for Violent Crimes. (May 2021). arxiv:2106.05498"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18637\/jss.v033.i01"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_32_1","first-page":"42","article-title":"Assessing risk: The use of risk assessment in sentencing","volume":"103","author":"Garrett Brandon","year":"2019","unstructured":"Brandon Garrett and John Monahan. 2019. Assessing risk: The use of risk assessment in sentencing. Judicature 103(2019), 42.","journal-title":"Judicature"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-criminol-011518-024739"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"John Geweke. 1992. Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculations of posterior moments. Bayesian statistics 4(1992) 641\u2013649.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198522669.003.0010"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_35_1","first-page":"677","article-title":"Defining flight risk","volume":"85","author":"Gouldin P.","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lauryn\u00a0P. Gouldin. 2018. Defining flight risk. University of Chicago Law Review 85 (2018), 677\u2013742.","journal-title":"University of Chicago Law Review"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/07418825.2014.932001"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1086\/688907"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10979-009-9180-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paul Heaton Sandra Mayson and Megan Stevenson. 2017. The downstream consequences of misdemeanor pretrial detention. Stanford Law Review 69(2017).","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.2809840"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0093854816678898"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_41_1","unstructured":"Imposition of a Sentence. 2018. 18 U.S.C. \u00a73553(a)(6)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_42_1","volume-title":"Measurement as governance in and for responsible AI. (Sept","author":"Jacobs Z.","year":"2021","unstructured":"Abigail\u00a0Z. Jacobs. 2021. Measurement as governance in and for responsible AI. (Sept. 2021). arxiv:2109.05658"},{"volume-title":"Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Virtual Event Canada). Association for Computing Machinery","author":"Z.","key":"e_1_3_2_1_43_1","unstructured":"Abigail\u00a0Z. Jacobs and Hanna Wallach. 2021. Measurement and Fairness. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Virtual Event Canada). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_44_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S2468-2667(20)30283-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_45_1","article-title":"Danger ahead: Risk assessment and the future of bail reform","volume":"93","author":"Koepke John\u00a0Logan","year":"2018","unstructured":"John\u00a0Logan Koepke and David\u00a0G Robinson. 2018. Danger ahead: Risk assessment and the future of bail reform. Washington Law Review 93, 4 (2018).","journal-title":"Washington Law Review"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_46_1","unstructured":"Besiki\u00a0Luka Kutateladze and Victoria\u00a0Z Lawson. 2015. How bad arrests lead to bad prosecution: Exploring the impact of prior arrests on plea bargaining. Cardozo Law Review 37(2015)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_47_1","volume-title":"Revitalizing the clemency process. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 39","author":"Larkin\u00a0Jr J","year":"2016","unstructured":"Paul\u00a0J Larkin\u00a0Jr. 2016. Revitalizing the clemency process. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 39 (2016)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_48_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3386\/w11491"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_49_1","volume-title":"Playing with the data: What legal scholars should learn about machine learning","author":"Lehr David","year":"2017","unstructured":"David Lehr and Paul Ohm. 2017. Playing with the data: What legal scholars should learn about machine learning. University of California, Davis Law Review 51 (2017)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_50_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1086\/695285"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_51_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1466-8238.2007.00358.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_52_1","volume-title":"The Impact of Incarceration on Recidivism. Annual Review of Criminology (Jan","author":"Loeffler E.","year":"2022","unstructured":"Charles\u00a0E. Loeffler and Daniel\u00a0S. Nagin. 2022. The Impact of Incarceration on Recidivism. Annual Review of Criminology (Jan. 2022)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_53_1","volume-title":"The epidemiological implications of incarceration dynamics in jails for community, corrections officer, and incarcerated population risks from COVID-19. MedRxiv","author":"Lofgren Eric","year":"2020","unstructured":"Eric Lofgren, Kristian Lum, Aaron Horowitz, Brooke Madubuonwu, Kellen Myers, and Nina\u00a0H. Fefferman. 2020. The epidemiological implications of incarceration dynamics in jails for community, corrections officer, and incarcerated population risks from COVID-19. MedRxiv (2020)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_54_1","first-page":"5","article-title":"Online access to court records - From documents to data, particulars to patterns","volume":"53","author":"Martin W.","year":"2008","unstructured":"Peter\u00a0W. Martin. 2008. Online access to court records - From documents to data, particulars to patterns. Villanova Law Review 53, 5 (Jan. 2008).","journal-title":"Villanova Law Review"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_55_1","volume-title":"Criminal discount factors and deterrence. Available at SSRN 2730969 (Feb","author":"Mastrobuoni Giovanni","year":"2016","unstructured":"Giovanni Mastrobuoni and David Rivers. 2016. Criminal discount factors and deterrence. Available at SSRN 2730969 (Feb. 2016)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_56_1","volume-title":"https:\/\/www.yalelawjournal.org\/article\/dangerous-defendants. The Yale Law Journal (Jan","author":"Mayson G.","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sandra\u00a0G. Mayson. 2018. Dangerous Defendants. https:\/\/www.yalelawjournal.org\/article\/dangerous-defendants. The Yale Law Journal (Jan. 2018)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_57_1","unstructured":"Robert McCulloch Matthew Pratola and Hugh Chipman. 2019. rbart: Bayesian Trees for Conditional Mean and Variance. https:\/\/CRAN.R-project.org\/package=rbart R package version 1.0."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_58_1","unstructured":"Kevin\u00a0I. Minor James\u00a0B. Wells and Crissy Sims. 2003. Recidivism Among Federal Probationers-Predicting Sentence Violations. Federal Probation 67(2003)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_59_1","unstructured":"Modification of an Imposed Term of Imprisonment. 2018. 18 U.S.C. \u00a73582(c)(1)(A)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_60_1","volume-title":"Human-Centered Study of Data Science Work Practices. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland UK) (CHI EA \u201919","author":"Muller Michael","year":"2019","unstructured":"Michael Muller, Melanie Feinberg, Timothy George, Steven\u00a0J. Jackson, Bonnie\u00a0E. John, Mary\u00a0Beth Kery, and Samir Passi. 2019. Human-Centered Study of Data Science Work Practices. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland UK) (CHI EA \u201919, Paper W15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1\u20138."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_61_1","volume-title":"Procurement as policy: Administrative process for machine learning. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 34","author":"Mulligan K.","year":"2019","unstructured":"Deirdre\u00a0K. Mulligan and Kenneth\u00a0A. Bamberger. 2019. Procurement as policy: Administrative process for machine learning. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 34 (2019)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_62_1","volume-title":"Federal Sentencing: The Basics. United States Sentencing Commission, Washington (Aug.","author":"General\u00a0Counsel The\u00a0Office","year":"2015","unstructured":"The\u00a0Office of General\u00a0Counsel and The\u00a0Office of Education & Sentencing\u00a0Process. 2015. Federal Sentencing: The Basics. United States Sentencing Commission, Washington (Aug. 2015)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_63_1","unstructured":"Bureau of Justice\u00a0Statistics. 2005. State Court Sentencing of Convicted Felons. (2005)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_64_1","unstructured":"Administrative\u00a0Office of\u00a0the U.S. Courts\u00a0(AOUSC). 2018. An overview of the federal post conviction risk assessment. (2018)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_65_1","unstructured":"Ngozi Okidegbe. 2021. The Democratizing Potential Of Algorithms?Connecticut Law Review Forthcoming(2021)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_66_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3287560.3287567"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_67_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/2053951720939605"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_68_1","volume-title":"Pastore and Kathleen Maguire","author":"L.","year":"2003","unstructured":"Ann\u00a0L. Pastore and Kathleen Maguire. 2003. Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics 2002. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_69_1","volume-title":"Global Prison Trends","author":"International Penal Reform","year":"2018","unstructured":"Penal Reform International. 2018. Global Prison Trends 2018. Penal Reform International, London, England."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_70_1","volume-title":"Locked In: The True Causes of Mass Incarceration-and How to Achieve Real Reform (illustrated edition ed.)","author":"Pfaff John","year":"2017","unstructured":"John Pfaff. 2017. Locked In: The True Causes of Mass Incarceration-and How to Achieve Real Reform (illustrated edition ed.). Basic Books."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_71_1","unstructured":"Matthew Pratola Hugh Chipman Edward George and Robert McCulloch. 2017. Heteroscedastic BART using multiplicative regression trees. (2017). arxiv:1709.07542"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_72_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0093854810376354"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_73_1","volume-title":"Overview of Federal Criminal Cases\u2013Fiscal Year","author":"Reedt Louis","year":"2011","unstructured":"Louis Reedt and Melissa Reimer. 2012. Overview of Federal Criminal Cases\u2013Fiscal Year 2011. United States Sentencing Commission, Washington (Sept. 2012)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_74_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.2026577118"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_75_1","volume-title":"Schmitt and Elizabeth Jones","author":"R.","year":"2017","unstructured":"Glenn\u00a0R. Schmitt and Elizabeth Jones. 2017. Overview of Federal Criminal Cases\u2013Fiscal Year 2016. United States Sentencing Commission, Washington (May 2017)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_76_1","volume-title":"Washington (Nov.","author":"Schmitt R.","year":"2017","unstructured":"Glenn\u00a0R. Schmitt, Louis Reedt, and Kevin Blackwell. 2017. Demographic differences in sentencing: An Update to the 2012 Booker Report. United States Sentencing Commission, Washington (Nov. 2017)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_77_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1525\/nclr.2019.22.4.434"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_78_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/bsl.2054"},{"volume-title":"Handbook of Recidivism Risk\/Needs Assessment Tools","author":"Singh P.","key":"e_1_3_2_1_79_1","unstructured":"Jay\u00a0P. Singh, Daryl\u00a0G. Kroner, J.\u00a0Stephen Wormith, Sarah\u00a0L. Desmarais, and Zachary Hamilton. 2018. Handbook of Recidivism Risk\/Needs Assessment Tools. John Wiley & Sons."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_80_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/lhb0000090"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_81_1","first-page":"680","article-title":"Risk, Race","volume":"54","author":"Skeem L.","year":"2016","unstructured":"Jennifer\u00a0L. Skeem and Christopher\u00a0T. Lowenkamp. 2016. Risk, Race, And Recidivism: Predictive Bias and Disparate Impact. Criminology 54, 4 (2016), 680\u2013712.","journal-title":"And Recidivism: Predictive Bias and Disparate Impact. Criminology"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_82_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.305459"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_83_1","volume-title":"Racial Disparities in Criminal Sentencing Vary Considerably across Federal Judges. SocArXiv (July","author":"Smith M.","year":"2021","unstructured":"Christian\u00a0M. Smith, Nicholas Goldrosen, Maria-Veronica Ciocanel, Rebecca Santorella, Chad\u00a0M. Topaz, and Shilad Sen. 2021. Racial Disparities in Criminal Sentencing Vary Considerably across Federal Judges. SocArXiv (July 2021)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_84_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/aler\/ahu010"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_85_1","unstructured":"Sonja\u00a0B. Starr and M.\u00a0Marit Rehavi. 2013. Mandatory sentencing and racial disparity: Assessing the role of prosecutors and the effects of Booker. Yale Law Journal 123(2013)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_86_1","volume-title":"On Estimating Disparity and Inferring Causation: Sur-Reply to the U.S. Sentencing Commission Staff. The Yale Law Journal Online 123","author":"Starr B.","year":"2013","unstructured":"Sonja\u00a0B. Starr and M.\u00a0Marit Rehavi. 2013. On Estimating Disparity and Inferring Causation: Sur-Reply to the U.S. Sentencing Commission Staff. The Yale Law Journal Online 123 (2013)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_87_1","volume-title":"Pretrial detention and the value of liberty. Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper2021-14","author":"Stevenson T.","year":"2021","unstructured":"Megan\u00a0T. Stevenson and Sandra\u00a0G. Mayson. 2021. Pretrial detention and the value of liberty. Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper2021-14 (2021)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_88_1","volume-title":"Sentencing and prison practices in Germany and the Netherlands: Implications for the United States","author":"Subramanian Ram","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ram Subramanian and Alison Shames. 2013. Sentencing and prison practices in Germany and the Netherlands: Implications for the United States. Vera Institute of Justice Center on Sentencing and Corrections (Oct. 2013)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_89_1","volume-title":"Colorado pretrial assessment tool validation study final report","author":"Terranova A.","year":"2020","unstructured":"Victoria\u00a0A. Terranova and Kyle\u00a0C. Ward. 2020. Colorado pretrial assessment tool validation study final report. National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (July 2020)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_90_1","unstructured":"The Annie E. Casey Foundation. 2007. Focus on Children of Incarcerated Parents. https:\/\/www.aecf.org\/resources\/focus-on-children-with-incarcerated-parents."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_91_1","volume-title":"Sentencing\u00a0Table","author":"Sentence Determining","year":"2021","unstructured":"Determining the Sentence: Sentencing\u00a0Table. 2021. U.S.S.G. \u00a75A. https:\/\/www.ussc.gov\/guidelines\/2021-guidelines-manual\/annotated-2021-chapter-5."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_92_1","volume-title":"The Treatment of Persons with Mental Illness in Prisons and Jails: A State Survey","author":"Torrey Fuller","year":"2014","unstructured":"E.\u00a0Fuller Torrey, Mary\u00a0T. Zdanowicz, Sheriff Aaron\u00a0D. Kennard, H.\u00a0Richard Lamb, Donald\u00a0F. Eslinger, Michael\u00a0C. Biasotti, and Doris\u00a0A. Fuller. 2014. The Treatment of Persons with Mental Illness in Prisons and Jails: A State Survey. Treatment Advocacy Center and National Sheriffs\u2019 Association Joint Report (April 2014)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_93_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph15112500"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_94_1","unstructured":"The Pew\u00a0Charitable Trusts. 2010. Collateral costs: Incarceration\u2019s effect on economic mobility. https:\/\/www.pewtrusts.org\/en\/research-and-analysis\/reports\/0001\/01\/01\/collateral-costs."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_95_1","unstructured":"Jenia\u00a0I. Turner. 2020. Transparency in Plea Bargaining. Notre Dame Law Review 96(2020)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_96_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-criminol-011518-024601"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_97_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cody Tuttle. 2019. Racial disparities in federal sentencing: Evidence from drug mandatory minimums. Available at SSRN 3080463(2019).","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3080463"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_98_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1745-9125.2006.00059.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_99_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/07418820902998063"},{"volume-title":"Life and Death in Rikers Island(1 ed.)","author":"Venters Homer","key":"e_1_3_2_1_100_1","unstructured":"Homer Venters. 2019. Life and Death in Rikers Island(1 ed.). Johns Hopkins University Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_101_1","volume-title":"Jail and overdose: Assessing the community impact of incarceration on overdose. Addiction (July","author":"Victor Grant","year":"2021","unstructured":"Grant Victor, Catherine Zettner, Philip Huynh, Bradley Ray, and Emily Sightes. 2021. Jail and overdose: Assessing the community impact of incarceration on overdose. Addiction (July 2021)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_102_1","volume-title":"Impact of risk assessment instruments on rates of pretrial detention, postconviction placements, and release: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior 43, 5","author":"Viljoen L.","year":"2019","unstructured":"Jodi\u00a0L. Viljoen, Melissa\u00a0R. Jonnson, Dana\u00a0M. Cochrane, Lee\u00a0M. Vargen, and Gina\u00a0M. Vincent. 2019. Impact of risk assessment instruments on rates of pretrial detention, postconviction placements, and release: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior 43, 5 (2019)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_103_1","unstructured":"Rebecca Wallace and Aaron Horowitz. 2020. Dangerous misleading and biased: A letter on pretrial risk assessment tools in Colorado. https:\/\/www.aclu-co.org\/sites\/default\/files\/Dangerous-Misleading-and-Biased-A-Letter-on-Pretrial-Risk-Assessment-Tools-in-Colorado.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_104_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-031025"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_105_1","volume-title":"Have Interjudge Sentencing Disparities Increased in an Advisory Guidelines Regime-Evidence from Booker","author":"Yang S.","year":"2014","unstructured":"Crystal\u00a0S. Yang. 2014. Have Interjudge Sentencing Disparities Increased in an Advisory Guidelines Regime-Evidence from Booker. New York University Law Review 89 (2014)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_106_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1086\/680989"}],"event":{"name":"FAccT '22: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency","sponsor":["ACM Association for Computing Machinery"],"location":"Seoul Republic of Korea","acronym":"FAccT '22"},"container-title":["2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3531146.3533104","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3531146.3533104","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3531146.3533104","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,17]],"date-time":"2025-06-17T19:02:08Z","timestamp":1750186928000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3531146.3533104"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,20]]},"references-count":105,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3531146.3533104","10.1145\/3531146"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3531146.3533104","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2022-06-20","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}