{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,21]],"date-time":"2026-07-21T01:59:57Z","timestamp":1784599197749,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":55,"publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,30]],"date-time":"2022-04-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651276800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,30]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Autonomous Systems (ASes) exchange reachability information between each other using BGP---the de-facto standard inter-AS routing protocol. While IPv4 (IPv6) routes more specific than \/24 (\/48) are commonly filtered (and hence not propagated), route collectors still observe many of them.<\/jats:p>\n          <jats:p>In this work, we take a closer look at those \"hyper-specific\" prefixes (HSPs). In particular, we analyze their prevalence, use cases, and whether operators use them intentionally or accidentally. While their total number increases over time, most HSPs can only be seen by route collector peers. Nonetheless, some HSPs can be seen constantly throughout an entire year and propagate widely. We find that most HSPs represent (internal) routes to peering infrastructure or are related to address block relocations or blackholing. While hundreds of operators intentionally add HSPs to well-known routing databases, we observe that many HSPs are possibly accidentally leaked routes.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1145\/3544912.3544916","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,20]],"date-time":"2022-06-20T20:35:27Z","timestamp":1655757327000},"page":"20-34","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Hyper-specific prefixes"],"prefix":"10.1145","volume":"52","author":[{"given":"Khwaja Zubair","family":"Sediqi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"MPI-INF"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lars","family":"Prehn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"MPI-INF"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Oliver","family":"Gasser","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"MPI-INF"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_1_1","unstructured":"Emile Aben and Colin Petrie. 2014. Propagation of Longer-than-\/24 IPv4 Prefixes. https:\/\/labs.ripe.net\/Members\/emileaben\/propagation-of-longer-than-24-ipv4-prefixes  Emile Aben and Colin Petrie. 2014. Propagation of Longer-than-\/24 IPv4 Prefixes. https:\/\/labs.ripe.net\/Members\/emileaben\/propagation-of-longer-than-24-ipv4-prefixes"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","unstructured":"Emile Aben and Colin Petrie. 2015. Has the Routability of Longer-than-\/24 Prefixes Changed? https:\/\/labs.ripe.net\/Members\/emileaben\/has-the-routability-of-longer-than-24-prefixes-changed  Emile Aben and Colin Petrie. 2015. Has the Routability of Longer-than-\/24 Prefixes Changed? https:\/\/labs.ripe.net\/Members\/emileaben\/has-the-routability-of-longer-than-24-prefixes-changed"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1109\/GLOCOM.2002.1189019","volume-title":"Global Telecommunications Conference, 2002. GLOBECOM'02. IEEE","volume":"3","author":"Bu Tian","year":"2002","unstructured":"Tian Bu , Lixin Gao , and Don Towsley . 2002 . On characterizing BGP routing table growth . In Global Telecommunications Conference, 2002. GLOBECOM'02. IEEE , Vol. 3 . IEEE, 2185--2189. Tian Bu, Lixin Gao, and Don Towsley. 2002. On characterizing BGP routing table growth. In Global Telecommunications Conference, 2002. GLOBECOM'02. IEEE, Vol. 3. IEEE, 2185--2189."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/MNET.2005.1407694"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3355369.3355596"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","unstructured":"Cisco. 2021. Removing Private AS Numbers from the AS Path in BGP. https:\/\/www.cisco.com\/c\/en\/us\/td\/docs\/ios-xml\/ios\/iproute_bgp\/configuration\/xe-16\/irg-xe-16-book\/removing-private-as-numbers-from-the-as-path-in-bgp.html  Cisco. 2021. Removing Private AS Numbers from the AS Path in BGP. https:\/\/www.cisco.com\/c\/en\/us\/td\/docs\/ios-xml\/ios\/iproute_bgp\/configuration\/xe-16\/irg-xe-16-book\/removing-private-as-numbers-from-the-as-path-in-bgp.html"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/JSAC.2010.101002"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","unstructured":"DE-CIX. 2021. BGP announcement filtering. https:\/\/www.de-cix.net\/en\/locations\/frankfurt\/route-server-guide  DE-CIX. 2021. BGP announcement filtering. https:\/\/www.de-cix.net\/en\/locations\/frankfurt\/route-server-guide"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-30505-9_24"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3281411.3281413"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_1","unstructured":"Gert D\u00f6ring. 2013. IPv6 BGP filter recommendations. https:\/\/www.space.net\/~gert\/RIPE\/ipv6-filters.html  Gert D\u00f6ring. 2013. IPv6 BGP filter recommendations. https:\/\/www.space.net\/~gert\/RIPE\/ipv6-filters.html"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.17487\/RFC7454"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_1","volume-title":"On Inferring Autonomous System Relationships in the Internet","author":"Gao Lixin","year":"2001","unstructured":"Lixin Gao . 2001. On Inferring Autonomous System Relationships in the Internet . IEEE\/ACM Transactions on networking 9, 6 ( 2001 ), 733--745. Lixin Gao. 2001. On Inferring Autonomous System Relationships in the Internet. IEEE\/ACM Transactions on networking 9, 6 (2001), 733--745."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3452296.3472928"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3131365.3131379"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3419394.3423624"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_17_1","unstructured":"Geoff Huston. 2017. BGP more specifics: routing vandalism or useful? https:\/\/blog.apnic.net\/2017\/06\/26\/bgp-specifics-routing-vandalism-useful\/  Geoff Huston. 2017. BGP more specifics: routing vandalism or useful? https:\/\/blog.apnic.net\/2017\/06\/26\/bgp-specifics-routing-vandalism-useful\/"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.17487\/RFC6483"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_19_1","unstructured":"irr.net. 2021. List of Routing Registries. http:\/\/www.irr.net\/docs\/list.html  irr.net. 2021. List of Routing Registries. http:\/\/www.irr.net\/docs\/list.html"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_20_1","unstructured":"Isolario 2021. Isolario Project. Available at https:\/\/isolario.it\/.  Isolario 2021. Isolario Project. Available at https:\/\/isolario.it\/."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_21_1","volume-title":"Your Remnant Tells Secret: Residual Resolution in DDoS Protection Services. In 2018 48th Annual IEEE\/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN). IEEE, 362--373","author":"Jin Lin","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lin Jin , Shuai Hao , Haining Wang , and Chase Cotton . 2018 . Your Remnant Tells Secret: Residual Resolution in DDoS Protection Services. In 2018 48th Annual IEEE\/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN). IEEE, 362--373 . Lin Jin, Shuai Hao, Haining Wang, and Chase Cotton. 2018. Your Remnant Tells Secret: Residual Resolution in DDoS Protection Services. In 2018 48th Annual IEEE\/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN). IEEE, 362--373."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_22_1","unstructured":"Juniper. 2021. Understanding BGP Confederations. https:\/\/www.juniper.net\/documentation\/us\/en\/software\/junos\/bgp\/topics\/topic-map\/bgp-confederations-for-scaling.html  Juniper. 2021. Understanding BGP Confederations. https:\/\/www.juniper.net\/documentation\/us\/en\/software\/junos\/bgp\/topics\/topic-map\/bgp-confederations-for-scaling.html"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"T. King C. Dietzel J. Snijders G. Doering and G. Hankins. 2016. BLACKHOLE Community. RFC 7999. RFC Editor.  T. King C. Dietzel J. Snijders G. Doering and G. Hankins. 2016. BLACKHOLE Community. RFC 7999. RFC Editor.","DOI":"10.17487\/RFC7999"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3487552.3487865"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2987443.2987458"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.comnet.2015.02.008"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/INFCOMW.2012.6193487"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/ITC.2013.6662950"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_29_1","unstructured":"MANRS. 2021. Prefix filter configuration tools. https:\/\/www.manrs.org\/isps\/guide\/filtering\/  MANRS. 2021. Prefix filter configuration tools. https:\/\/www.manrs.org\/isps\/guide\/filtering\/"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_30_1","volume-title":"Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference","author":"Marder Alexander","year":"2018","unstructured":"Alexander Marder , Matthew Luckie , Amogh Dhamdhere , Bradley Huffaker , KC Claffy , and Jonathan M Smith . 2018 . Pushing the boundaries with bdrmapit: Mapping router ownership at Internet scale . In Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference 2018. 56--69. Alexander Marder, Matthew Luckie, Amogh Dhamdhere, Bradley Huffaker, KC Claffy, and Jonathan M Smith. 2018. Pushing the boundaries with bdrmapit: Mapping router ownership at Internet scale. In Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference 2018. 56--69."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/1052812.1052827"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3355369.3355593"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_33_1","unstructured":"NLNOG. 2021. Filtering Small Prefixes. https:\/\/bgpfilterguide.nlnog.net\/guides\/small_prefixes\/  NLNOG. 2021. Filtering Small Prefixes. https:\/\/bgpfilterguide.nlnog.net\/guides\/small_prefixes\/"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_34_1","unstructured":"NOCTION. 2021. BGP Prefix Filtering. https:\/\/www.noction.com\/knowledge-base\/bgp-prefix-filtering  NOCTION. 2021. BGP Prefix Filtering. https:\/\/www.noction.com\/knowledge-base\/bgp-prefix-filtering"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3386367.3431314"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3386367.3431301"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/MCOM.2003.1200112"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_38_1","unstructured":"Rapid7. 2021. Rapid7 Open Data. https:\/\/opendata.rapid7.com\/  Rapid7. 2021. Rapid7 Open Data. https:\/\/opendata.rapid7.com\/"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.17487\/RFC4271"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.17487\/RFC3021"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_41_1","unstructured":"RIPE. 2021. RIPE Atlas Measurement Dumps - [2021\/05\/17-23]. https:\/\/data-store.ripe.net\/datasets\/atlas-daily-dumps\/  RIPE. 2021. RIPE Atlas Measurement Dumps - [2021\/05\/17-23]. https:\/\/data-store.ripe.net\/datasets\/atlas-daily-dumps\/"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_42_1","unstructured":"RIPE NCC. 2021. RIPE Atlas measurement platform. https:\/\/atlas.ripe.net\/  RIPE NCC. 2021. RIPE Atlas measurement platform. https:\/\/atlas.ripe.net\/"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_43_1","unstructured":"RIPE NCC. 2021. RIPE RPKI Snapshots. https:\/\/ftp.ripe.net\/rpki\/  RIPE NCC. 2021. RIPE RPKI Snapshots. https:\/\/ftp.ripe.net\/rpki\/"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_44_1","unstructured":"RIPE-RIS 2021. RIPE Routing Information Service. http:\/\/www.ripe.net\/ris\/.  RIPE-RIS 2021. RIPE Routing Information Service. http:\/\/www.ripe.net\/ris\/."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_45_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/JSAC.2011.111006"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_46_1","unstructured":"Routeviews 2021. Routeviews Project - University of Oregon. Available at http:\/\/www.routeviews.org\/.  Routeviews 2021. Routeviews Project - University of Oregon. Available at http:\/\/www.routeviews.org\/."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_47_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3359989.3365414"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_48_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/INFCOM.2004.1354576"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_49_1","unstructured":"P. Smith and R. Evans. 2011. RIPE-532 - RIPE Routing Working Group Recommendations on IPv6 Route Aggregation. https:\/\/www.ripe.net\/publications\/docs\/ripe-532  P. Smith and R. Evans. 2011. RIPE-532 - RIPE Routing Working Group Recommendations on IPv6 Route Aggregation. https:\/\/www.ripe.net\/publications\/docs\/ripe-532"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_50_1","unstructured":"P. Smith R. Evans and M. Hughes. 2006. RIPE-399 - RIPE Routing Working Group Recommendations on Route Aggregation. https:\/\/www.ripe.net\/publications\/docs\/ripe-399  P. Smith R. Evans and M. Hughes. 2006. RIPE-399 - RIPE Routing Working Group Recommendations on Route Aggregation. https:\/\/www.ripe.net\/publications\/docs\/ripe-399"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_51_1","volume-title":"BGP Even-More Specifics","author":"Strowes Stephen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Stephen Strowes and Colin Petrie . 2017. BGP Even-More Specifics in 2017 . https:\/\/labs.ripe.net\/Members\/stephen_strowes\/bgp-even-more-specifics-in-2017 Stephen Strowes and Colin Petrie. 2017. BGP Even-More Specifics in 2017. https:\/\/labs.ripe.net\/Members\/stephen_strowes\/bgp-even-more-specifics-in-2017"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_52_1","unstructured":"The Broadband Forum. 2018. TR-069: CPE WAN Management Protocol. https:\/\/www.broadband-forum.org\/technical\/download\/TR-069_Amendment-6.pdf  The Broadband Forum. 2018. TR-069: CPE WAN Management Protocol. https:\/\/www.broadband-forum.org\/technical\/download\/TR-069_Amendment-6.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_53_1","unstructured":"CAIDA UCSD. 2021. The IPv4 Routed \/24 Topology Dataset - [2021\/05\/17-23]. https:\/\/data.caida.org\/datasets\/topology\/ark\/ipv4\/probe-data\/  CAIDA UCSD. 2021. The IPv4 Routed \/24 Topology Dataset - [2021\/05\/17-23]. https:\/\/data.caida.org\/datasets\/topology\/ark\/ipv4\/probe-data\/"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_54_1","unstructured":"CAIDA UCSD. 2021. The IPv6 Routed \/48 Topology Dataset - [2021\/05\/17-23]. https:\/\/publicdata.caida.org\/datasets\/topology\/ark\/ipv6\/probe-data\/  CAIDA UCSD. 2021. The IPv6 Routed \/48 Topology Dataset - [2021\/05\/17-23]. https:\/\/publicdata.caida.org\/datasets\/topology\/ark\/ipv6\/probe-data\/"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_55_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3487552.3487853"}],"container-title":["ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3544912.3544916","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3544912.3544916","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,17]],"date-time":"2025-06-17T19:00:01Z","timestamp":1750186801000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3544912.3544916"}},"subtitle":["gotta enjoy the little things in interdomain routing"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,30]]},"references-count":55,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,30]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3544912.3544916"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3544912.3544916","relation":{},"ISSN":["0146-4833"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0146-4833","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,30]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2022-06-20","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}