{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,15]],"date-time":"2026-04-15T17:53:02Z","timestamp":1776275582647,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":97,"publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)","issue":"CSCW1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,14]],"date-time":"2023-04-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1681430400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100018569","name":"Snap Inc.","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100018569","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,14]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Prior work has identified a resilient phenomenon that threatens the performance of human-AI decision-making teams: overreliance, when people agree with an AI, even when it is incorrect. Surprisingly, overreliance does not reduce when the AI produces explanations for its predictions, compared to only providing predictions. Some have argued that overreliance results from cognitive biases or uncalibrated trust, attributing overreliance to an inevitability of human cognition. By contrast, our paper argues that people strategically choose whether or not to engage with an AI explanation, demonstrating empirically that there are scenarios where AI explanations reduce overreliance. To achieve this, we formalize this strategic choice in a cost-benefit framework, where the costs and benefits of engaging with the task are weighed against the costs and benefits of relying on the AI. We manipulate the costs and benefits in a maze task, where participants collaborate with a simulated AI to find the exit of a maze. Through 5 studies (N = 731), we find that costs such as task difficulty (Study 1), explanation difficulty (Study 2, 3), and benefits such as monetary compensation (Study 4) affect overreliance. Finally, Study 5 adapts the Cognitive Effort Discounting paradigm to quantify the utility of different explanations, providing further support for our framework. Our results suggest that some of the null effects found in literature could be due in part to the explanation not sufficiently reducing the costs of verifying the AI's prediction.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1145\/3579605","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,16]],"date-time":"2023-04-16T17:23:07Z","timestamp":1681665787000},"page":"1-38","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":261,"title":["Explanations Can Reduce Overreliance on AI Systems During Decision-Making"],"prefix":"10.1145","volume":"7","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6649-6905","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Helena","family":"Vasconcelos","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2972-462X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Matthew","family":"J\u00f6rke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7290-068X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Madeleine","family":"Grunde-McLaughlin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9162-0779","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tobias","family":"Gerstenberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8020-9434","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Michael S.","family":"Bernstein","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8784-2531","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ranjay","family":"Krishna","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_1_1","volume-title":"Ethics of Data and Analytics","author":"Angwin Julia","unstructured":"Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu, and Lauren Kirchner. 2016. Machine bias. In Ethics of Data and Analytics. Auerbach Publications, 254--264."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","volume-title":"The theory of learning by doing. Psychological review 86, 2","author":"Anzai Yuichiro","year":"1979","unstructured":"Yuichiro Anzai and Herbert A Simon. 1979. The theory of learning by doing. Psychological review 86, 2 (1979), 124."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1609\/hcomp.v7i1.5285"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","volume-title":"Marco Tulio Ribeiro, and Daniel S. Weld","author":"Bansal Gagan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gagan Bansal, Tongshuang Wu, Joyce Zhou, Raymond Fok, Besmira Nushi, Ece Kamar, Marco Tulio Ribeiro, and Daniel S. Weld. 2021. Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performance. arXiv:2006.14779 [cs.AI]"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","unstructured":"Bernard Barber. 1983. The logic and limits of trust. (1983)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0109264"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","volume-title":"The computational and neural basis of cognitive control: Charted territory and new frontiers. Cognitive science 38, 6","author":"Botvinick Matthew M","year":"2014","unstructured":"Matthew M Botvinick and Jonathan D Cohen. 2014. The computational and neural basis of cognitive control: Charted territory and new frontiers. Cognitive science 38, 6 (2014), 1249--1285."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3377325.3377498"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3449287"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/ICHI.2015.26"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2783258.2788613"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_1","unstructured":"Arjun Chandrasekaran Deshraj Yadav Prithvijit Chattopadhyay Viraj Prabhu and Devi Parikh. 2017. It Takes Two to Tango: Towards Theory of AI's Mind. arXiv:1704.00717 [cs.CV]"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/MCSE.2016.74"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3290605.3300761"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_1","unstructured":"Eric Chu Deb Roy and Jacob Andreas. 2020. Are Visual Explanations Useful? A Case Study in Model-in-the-Loop Prediction. arXiv:2007.12248 [cs.LG]"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_16_1","volume-title":"Clinical cognition and diagnostic error: applications of a dual process model of reasoning. Advances in health sciences education 14, 1","author":"Croskerry Pat","year":"2009","unstructured":"Pat Croskerry. 2009. Clinical cognition and diagnostic error: applications of a dual process model of reasoning. Advances in health sciences education 14, 1 (2009), 27--35."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/ACM.0b013e3181ace703"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1073191118793208"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/xge0000033"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.48550\/ARXIV.2106.05506"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1518\/0018720024494856"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3411764.3445188"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-60117-1_33"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3290607.3312787"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jonathan St BT Evans. 2003. In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in cognitive sciences 7 10 (2003) 454--459.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tics.2003.08.012"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shi Feng and Jordan Boyd-Graber. 2019. What can AI do for me: Evaluating Machine Learning Interpretations in Cooperative Play. arXiv:1810.09648 [cs.AI]","DOI":"10.1145\/3301275.3302265"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_27_1","volume-title":"Bayesian data analysis","author":"Gelman Andrew","unstructured":"Andrew Gelman, John B Carlin, Hal S Stern, and Donald B Rubin. 1995. Bayesian data analysis. Chapman and Hall\/CRC."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_28_1","unstructured":"Ana Valeria Gonzalez Gagan Bansal Angela Fan Robin Jia Yashar Mehdad and Srinivasan Iyer. 2020. Human Evaluation of Spoken vs. Visual Explanations for Open-Domain QA. arXiv:2012.15075 [cs.CL]"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3411764.3445423"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3359152"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_31_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Blinking on the Bench: How Judges Decide Cases","volume":"93","author":"Guthrie Chris","year":"2007","unstructured":"Chris Guthrie and Andrew J Wistrich. 2007. Blinking on the Bench: How Judges Decide Cases. Cornell Law Review 93 (2007), 1.","journal-title":"Cornell Law Review"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/jcmc\/zmz022"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_33_1","volume-title":"Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior? arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01831","author":"Hase Peter","year":"2020","unstructured":"Peter Hase and Mohit Bansal. 2020. Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior? arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01831 (2020)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1086\/286983"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0018720814547570"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_36_1","unstructured":"Benjamin D. Horne Dorit Nevo John O'Donovan Jin-Hee Cho and Sibel Adali. 2019. Rating Reliability and Bias in News Articles: Does AI Assistance Help Everyone? arXiv:1904.01531 [cs.CY]"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3411764.3445385"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_38_1","volume-title":"How machine-learning recommendations influence clinician treatment selections: the example of antidepressant selection. Translational psychiatry 11, 1","author":"Jacobs Maia","year":"2021","unstructured":"Maia Jacobs, Melanie F Pradier, Thomas H McCoy, Roy H Perlis, Finale Doshi-Velez, and Krzysztof Z Gajos. 2021. How machine-learning recommendations influence clinician treatment selections: the example of antidepressant selection. Translational psychiatry 11, 1 (2021), 1--9."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_39_1","volume-title":"Effort and accuracy in choice. Management science 31, 4","author":"Johnson Eric J","year":"1985","unstructured":"Eric J Johnson and John W Payne. 1985. Effort and accuracy in choice. Management science 31, 4 (1985), 395--414."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_40_1","volume-title":"A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. American psychologist 58, 9","author":"Kahneman Daniel","year":"2003","unstructured":"Daniel Kahneman. 2003. A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. American psychologist 58, 9 (2003), 697."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_41_1","unstructured":"Daniel Kahneman. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. Farrar Straus and Giroux New York."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3313831.3376219"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_43_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2858036.2858465"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_44_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3415234"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_45_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/a0031048"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_46_1","volume-title":"Mental labour. Nature human behaviour 2, 12","author":"Kool Wouter","year":"2018","unstructured":"Wouter Kool and Matthew Botvinick. 2018. Mental labour. Nature human behaviour 2, 12 (2018), 899--908."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_47_1","volume-title":"Cost-benefit arbitration between multiple reinforcement-learning systems. Psychological science 28, 9","author":"Kool Wouter","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wouter Kool, Samuel J Gershman, and Fiery A Cushman. 2017. Cost-benefit arbitration between multiple reinforcement-learning systems. Psychological science 28, 9 (2017), 1321--1333."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_48_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/a0020198"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_49_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/VLHCC.2013.6645235"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_50_1","volume-title":"Proceedings of mensch und computer","author":"Kulms Philipp","year":"2019","unstructured":"Philipp Kulms and Stefan Kopp. 2019. More human-likeness, more trust? The effect of anthropomorphism on self-reported and behavioral trust in continued and interdependent human-agent cooperation. In Proceedings of mensch und computer 2019. 31--42."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_51_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3290605.3300717"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_52_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Isaac Lage Emily Chen Jeffrey He Menaka Narayanan Been Kim Sam Gershman and Finale Doshi-Velez. 2019. An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanation. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/ARXIV.1902.00006","DOI":"10.48550\/ARXIV.1902.00006"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_53_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3313831.3376873"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_54_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3287560.3287590"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_55_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3287560.3287590"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_56_1","volume-title":"Dual-process cognitive interventions to enhance diagnostic reasoning: a systematic review. BMJ quality & safety 25, 10","author":"Lambe Kathryn Ann","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kathryn Ann Lambe, Gary O'Reilly, Brendan D Kelly, and Sarah Curristan. 2016. Dual-process cognitive interventions to enhance diagnostic reasoning: a systematic review. BMJ quality & safety 25, 10 (2016), 808--820."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_57_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.36.6.635"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_58_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/polq.12235"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_59_1","volume-title":"Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human factors 46, 1","author":"Lee John D","year":"2004","unstructured":"John D Lee and Katrina A See. 2004. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human factors 46, 1 (2004), 50--80."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_60_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/13546780802236308"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_61_1","unstructured":"Russell V. Lenth. 2021. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means aka Least-Squares Means. https:\/\/CRAN.R-project.org\/package=emmeans R package version 1.6.0."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_62_1","volume-title":"The structure and function of explanations. Trends in cognitive sciences 10, 10","author":"Lombrozo Tania","year":"2006","unstructured":"Tania Lombrozo. 2006. The structure and function of explanations. Trends in cognitive sciences 10, 10 (2006), 464--470."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_63_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2858036.2858288"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_64_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Scott Lundberg and Su-In Lee. 2017. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/ARXIV.1705.07874","DOI":"10.48550\/ARXIV.1705.07874"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_65_1","volume-title":"Shu-Fang Newman, Jerry Kim, et al.","author":"Lundberg Scott M","year":"2018","unstructured":"Scott M Lundberg, Bala Nair, Monica S Vavilala, Mayumi Horibe, Michael J Eisses, Trevor Adams, David E Liston, Daniel King-Wai Low, Shu-Fang Newman, Jerry Kim, et al. 2018. Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery. Nature biomedical engineering 2, 10 (2018), 749--760."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_66_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2018.02640"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_67_1","volume-title":"Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music, and Science. Citeseer, 213--222.","author":"McClendon Michael Scott","year":"2001","unstructured":"Michael Scott McClendon et al. 2001. The complexity and difficulty of a maze. In Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music, and Science. Citeseer, 213--222."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_68_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.0910662107"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_69_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tim Miller. 2018. Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences. arXiv:1706.07269 [cs.AI]","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2018.07.007"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_71_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_72_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3307339.3343255"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_73_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5772\/intechopen.70230"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_74_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3359204"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_75_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0278-7393.14.3.534"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_76_1","unstructured":"Joseph C Pitt. 1988. Theories of explanation. (1988)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_77_1","volume-title":"Individual differences in the calibration of trust in automation. Human factors 57, 4","author":"Pop Vlad L","year":"2015","unstructured":"Vlad L Pop, Alex Shrewsbury, and Francis T Durso. 2015. Individual differences in the calibration of trust in automation. Human factors 57, 4 (2015), 545--556."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_78_1","volume-title":"Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, and Hanna Wallach","author":"Poursabzi-Sangdeh Forough","year":"2021","unstructured":"Forough Poursabzi-Sangdeh, Daniel G. Goldstein, Jake M. Hofman, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, and Hanna Wallach. 2021. Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretability. arXiv:1802.07810 [cs.AI]"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_79_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pranav Rajpurkar Jian Zhang Konstantin Lopyrev and Percy Liang. 2016. SQuAD: 100 000 Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text. arXiv:1606.05250 [cs.CL]","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/D16-1264"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_80_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2017.12.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_81_1","volume-title":"Toward a rational and mechanistic account of mental effort. Annual review of neuroscience 40","author":"Shenhav Amitai","year":"2017","unstructured":"Amitai Shenhav, Sebastian Musslick, Falk Lieder, Wouter Kool, Thomas L Griffiths, Jonathan D Cohen, and Matthew M Botvinick. 2017. Toward a rational and mechanistic account of mental effort. Annual review of neuroscience 40 (2017), 99--124."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_82_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1751--9004.2009.00210.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_83_1","volume-title":"Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological review 63, 2","author":"Simon Herbert A","year":"1956","unstructured":"Herbert A Simon. 1956. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological review 63, 2 (1956), 129."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_84_1","volume-title":"The influence of decision aids on choice strategies: an experimental analysis of the role of cognitive effort. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 60, 1","author":"Todd Peter","year":"1994","unstructured":"Peter Todd and Izak Benbasat. 1994. The influence of decision aids on choice strategies: an experimental analysis of the role of cognitive effort. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 60, 1 (1994), 36--74."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_85_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/1978942.1979277"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_86_1","volume-title":"Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. science 185, 4157","author":"Tversky Amos","year":"1974","unstructured":"Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. science 185, 4157 (1974), 1124--1131."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_87_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00122574"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_88_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2020.103404"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_89_1","unstructured":"Milica Vasiljevic Mario Weick Peter Taylor-Gooby Dominic Abrams and Tim Hopthrow. 2013. Reasoning about extreme events: A review of behavioural biases in relation to catastrophe risks. (2013)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_90_1","volume-title":"War games and diagnostic errors. BMJ: British Medical Journal 355","author":"Vaughn Valerie M","year":"2016","unstructured":"Valerie M Vaughn, Vineet Chopra, and Joel D Howell. 2016. War games and diagnostic errors. BMJ: British Medical Journal 355 (2016)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_91_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3290605.3300831"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_92_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3397481.3450650"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_93_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3758\/s13415-015-0334-y"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_94_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0068210"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_95_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3290605.3300509"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_96_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3301275.3302277"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_97_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3351095.3372852"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_98_1","unstructured":"Shoshana Zuboff. 1988. In the age of the smart machine. (1988)."}],"container-title":["Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3579605","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3579605","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,17]],"date-time":"2025-06-17T17:48:43Z","timestamp":1750182523000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3579605"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,14]]},"references-count":97,"journal-issue":{"issue":"CSCW1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,14]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3579605"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3579605","relation":{},"ISSN":["2573-0142"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2573-0142","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,14]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2023-04-16","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}