{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,17]],"date-time":"2025-10-17T14:27:19Z","timestamp":1760711239254,"version":"3.41.0"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":46,"publisher":"ACM","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,19]],"date-time":"2023-06-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1687132800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,19]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3594536.3595156","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,7]],"date-time":"2023-09-07T23:40:01Z","timestamp":1694130001000},"page":"306-315","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Rebuilding 'ethics' to govern AI"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7952-2634","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mehmet B.","family":"Unver","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Hertfordshire Law School, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_1_1","unstructured":"American Bar Association (ABA). 2019. Model Rules of Professional Conduct https:\/\/www.americanbar.org\/groups\/professional_responsibility\/publications\/model_rules_of_professional_conduct\/."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_2_1","unstructured":"ABA. 2019. ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct 'Rule 3.4: Fairness to Opposing Party & Counsel'. https:\/\/www.americanbar.org\/groups\/professional_responsibility\/publications\/model_rules_of_professional_conduct\/rule_3_4_fairness_to_opposing_party_counsel\/."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_3_1","unstructured":"ABA. 2019. ABA Resolution 112. https:\/\/www.americanbar.org\/content\/dam\/aba\/directories\/policy\/annual-2019\/112-annual-2019.pdf."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_4_1","unstructured":"Anthony E. Davis 2020. The Future of Law Firms (and Lawyers) in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. The Professional Lawyer 27(1). https:\/\/www.americanbar.org\/groups\/professional_responsibility\/publications\/professional_lawyer\/27\/1\/."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"B. D. Mittelstadt et al 2016. The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate Big Data & Society 1 (July-December 2016).","DOI":"10.1177\/2053951716679679"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_6_1","volume-title":"Baker McKenzie Scales Up AI Transformation by Moving to Next Stage of Collaboration with SparkBeyond (24","author":"McKenzie Baker","year":"2021","unstructured":"Baker McKenzie. 2021. Baker McKenzie Scales Up AI Transformation by Moving to Next Stage of Collaboration with SparkBeyond (24 May 2021) https:\/\/www.bakermckenzie.com\/en\/newsroom\/2021\/05\/sparkbeyond-next-phase."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_7_1","unstructured":"Canadian Model Code of Professional Conduct (as amended October 19 2019). https:\/\/flsc-s3-storage-pub.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com\/Model-Code-October-2019.pdf."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_8_1","unstructured":"CCBE. 2021. Model Code of Conduct for European Lawyers. https:\/\/www.ccbe.eu\/fileadmin\/speciality_distribution\/public\/documents\/DEONTOLOGY\/DEON_CoC\/EN_DEONTO_2021_Model_Code.pdf."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_9_1","volume-title":"Guidance: Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safety ('UK Guidance 2019') (June","author":"Digital Central","year":"2019","unstructured":"Central Digital & Data Office and Office for Artificial Intelligence. 2019. Guidance: Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safety ('UK Guidance 2019') (June 2019). https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/guidance\/understanding-artificial-intelligence-ethics-and-safety."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_10_1","first-page":"43","article-title":". Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Professional Responsibilities of Lawyers","volume":"37","author":"Lam Chen Meng","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chen Meng Lam, 2020. Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Professional Responsibilities of Lawyers. Singapore Law Review 37, 43--60.","journal-title":"Singapore Law Review"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_11_1","unstructured":"Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE). 2020. Considerations on the Legal Aspects of Artificial Intelligence. https:\/\/www.ccbe.eu\/fileadmin\/speciality_distribution\/public\/documents\/IT_LAW\/ITL_Guides_recommendations\/EN_ITL_20200220_CCBE-considerations-on-the-Legal-Aspects-of-AI.pdf."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_12_1","volume-title":"Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (AI Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts","author":"Council of the European Union. 2022.","year":"2022","unstructured":"Council of the European Union. 2022. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (AI Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts, 25 November 2022 ('EU's Proposed AI Act')."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"D. Leslie et al 2021. Artificial intelligence human rights democracy and the rule of law: a primer prepared for the Council of Europe The Alan Turing Institute. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.4639743.","DOI":"10.5281\/zenodo.4639743"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_14_1","volume-title":"Muchman","author":"Linna Daniel W.","year":"2020","unstructured":"Daniel W. Linna Jr. and Wendy J. Muchman. 2020. Ethical Obligations to Protect Client Data when Building Artificial Intelligence Tools: Wigmore Meets AI. The Professional Lawyer, 27(1). https:\/\/www.americanbar.org\/groups\/professional_responsibility\/publications\/professional_lawyer\/27\/1\/."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_15_1","first-page":"173","article-title":"Ethical issues in Robo-Lawyering: The need for guidance on developing and using Artificial Intelligence in the practice of law","volume":"70","author":"Simshaw Drew","year":"2019","unstructured":"Drew Simshaw, 2019. Ethical issues in Robo-Lawyering: The need for guidance on developing and using Artificial Intelligence in the practice of law. Hastings Law Journal 70, 173--213.","journal-title":"Hastings Law Journal"},{"volume-title":"The Model Rules of Autonomous Conduct: Ethical Responsibilities of Lawyers and Artificial Intelligence","author":"Walters Ed","key":"e_1_3_2_1_16_1","unstructured":"Ed Walters, 2019. The Model Rules of Autonomous Conduct: Ethical Responsibilities of Lawyers and Artificial Intelligence. Georgia State University Law Review 35(4). https:\/\/readingroom.law.gsu.edu\/gsulr\/vol35\/iss4\/1."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_17_1","unstructured":"European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). 2018. European Ethical Charter on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial systems and their environment."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_18_1","unstructured":"Herbert B. Dixon Jr (Ret) 2020. What Judges and Lawyers Should Understand About Artificial Intelligence Technology. Judges' Journal. 59(1). https:\/\/www.americanbar.org\/groups\/judicial\/publications\/judges_journal\/2020\/winter\/."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_19_1","unstructured":"IEEE Standards Association. 2023. The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems. https:\/\/standards.ieee.org\/industry-connections\/ec\/autonomous-systems\/."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_20_1","unstructured":"Independent High-Level Expert Group (IHLEG) on Artificial Intelligence (set up by the European Commission). 2019. Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. https:\/\/digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu\/en\/library\/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_21_1","volume-title":"IBA International Principles on Conduct for the Legal Profession (28","author":"International Bar Association (IBA). 2011.","year":"2011","unstructured":"International Bar Association (IBA). 2011. IBA International Principles on Conduct for the Legal Profession (28 May 2011). https:\/\/www.icj.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/IBA_International_Principles_on_Conduct_for_the_legal_prof.pdf."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.37419\/JPL.V4.I5.1"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_23_1","volume-title":"Be competent in AI before adopting, integrating it into your practice' ABA Journal. (23","author":"Tashea Jason","year":"2019","unstructured":"Jason Tashea and Nicolas Economou, 2019. Be competent in AI before adopting, integrating it into your practice' ABA Journal. (23 April 2019). https:\/\/www.abajournal.com\/lawscribbler\/article\/before-lawyers-can-ethically-adopt-and-integrate-ai-into-their-practices-they-must-first-be-competent."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_24_1","volume-title":"IPRO, (October","author":"Wolf Jeffrey","year":"2022","unstructured":"Jeffrey Wolf, 2022. What is EDRM? (Electronic Discovery Reference Model) And How it Has Evolved. IPRO, (October 2022). https:\/\/ipro.com\/resources\/articles\/."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_25_1","unstructured":"John M. Barkett 2012. More on the Ethics of E-Discovery: Predictive Coding and Other Forms of Computer-Assisted Review. https:\/\/scholarship.law.duke.edu\/bolch\/8\/."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_26_1","volume-title":"Dierk Schindler and Roger Strathausen","author":"Jacob Kai","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kai Jacob, Dierk Schindler and Roger Strathausen, 2016. Liquid Legal: Transforming Legal into a Business Savvy, Information Enabled and Performance Driven Industry (Management for Professionals) Springer, Cham."},{"volume-title":"Emerging Rules on Artificial Intelligence: Trojan Horses of Ethics in the Realm of Law? In Larry A. DiMatteo et al. (Ed","author":"M\u00f6slein Florian","key":"e_1_3_2_1_27_1","unstructured":"Florian M\u00f6slein and Maximilian Horn. 2021. Emerging Rules on Artificial Intelligence: Trojan Horses of Ethics in the Realm of Law? In Larry A. DiMatteo et al. (Ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Lawyering in the Digital Age, 77--95. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_28_1","unstructured":"Law Council of Australia. 2020. Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules https:\/\/www.lawcouncil.asn.au\/policy-agenda\/regulation-of-the-profession-and-ethics\/australian-solicitors-conduct-rules."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_29_1","volume-title":"Technology collaboration transforming legal processes with AI innovation (1","author":"Futures Legal","year":"2019","unstructured":"Legal Futures. 2019. Technology collaboration transforming legal processes with AI innovation (1 October 2019). https:\/\/www.legalfutures.co.uk\/associate-news\/technology-collaboration-transforming-legal-processes-with-ai-innovation."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_30_1","unstructured":"Mehmet B. Unver 2022. Artificial Intelligence in the Legal Sector: Business as Usual? HertsLawSBlog. https:\/\/uhertslawblog.wordpress.com\/2022\/12\/06\/artificial-intelligence-in-the-legal-sector-business-as-usual\/."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_31_1","volume-title":"Ten principles for ethical AI. PwC Australia (April","author":"Axente Maria Luciana","year":"2022","unstructured":"Maria Luciana Axente and Ilana Golbin, 2022. Ten principles for ethical AI. PwC Australia (April 2022). https:\/\/www.pwc.com.au\/digitalpulse\/ten-principles-ethical-ai.html."},{"volume-title":"Personalisation in Markets, Politic and Law, 95--106","author":"Finck Mich\u00e8le","key":"e_1_3_2_1_32_1","unstructured":"Mich\u00e8le Finck. 2021. Hidden Personal Insights and Entangled in the Algorithmic Model: The Limits of the GDPR in the Personalisation Context. In U. Kohl and J. Eisler (Ed.) Data-Driven Personalisation in Markets, Politic and Law, 95--106. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge."},{"volume-title":"The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI, 197--213","author":"Diakopoulos Nicholas","key":"e_1_3_2_1_33_1","unstructured":"Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2020. Transparency. In M. D. Dubber, F. Pasquale and S. Das (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI, 197--213. Oxford University Press, New York."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_34_1","volume-title":"DiMatteo","author":"Ortolani Pietro","year":"2021","unstructured":"Pietro Ortolani and Larry A. DiMatteo. 2021. Lawyering in Digital Age? In Larry A. DiMatteo et al. (Ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Lawyering in the Digital Age, 1--37. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_35_1","unstructured":"R. Parnham M. Sako and J. Armour 2021. AI-assisted lawtech: its impact on law firms. University of Oxford (December 2021). https:\/\/www.law.ox.ac.uk\/sites\/default\/files\/migrated\/ai_final1097.pdf."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_36_1","unstructured":"Singapore Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules. 2015. https:\/\/sso.agc.gov.sg\/SL\/LPA1966-S706-2015."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_37_1","unstructured":"Slaughter and May. 2022. Collaborate. https:\/\/www.slaughterandmay.com\/our-firm\/innovation\/collaborate\/."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_38_1","unstructured":"Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). 2018. SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors RELs and RFLs. https:\/\/www.sra.org.uk\/solicitors\/standards-regulations\/code-conduct-solicitors\/."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_39_1","volume-title":"Guidance: Confidentiality of client information. https:\/\/www.sra.org.uk\/solicitors\/guidance\/confidentiality-client-information\/.","author":"SRA.","year":"2020","unstructured":"SRA. 2020. Guidance: Confidentiality of client information. https:\/\/www.sra.org.uk\/solicitors\/guidance\/confidentiality-client-information\/."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_40_1","unstructured":"The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems. 2019. Law. https:\/\/standards.ieee.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/import\/documents\/other\/ead_law.pdf."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_41_1","volume-title":"Horizon Scanning: Artificial Intelligence and the Legal Profession. https:\/\/www.lawsociety.org.uk\/topics\/research\/ai-artificial-intelligence-and-the-legal-profession.","author":"The Law Society of England and Wales.","year":"2018","unstructured":"The Law Society of England and Wales. 2018. Horizon Scanning: Artificial Intelligence and the Legal Profession. https:\/\/www.lawsociety.org.uk\/topics\/research\/ai-artificial-intelligence-and-the-legal-profession."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_42_1","unstructured":"Thomson Reuters. 2023. Case study: HSBC. https:\/\/legalsolutions.thomsonreuters.co.uk\/en\/products-services\/highq\/customer-stories\/hsbc.html"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_43_1","volume-title":"Office for Artificial Intelligence.","author":"Cabinet Office UK","year":"2021","unstructured":"UK Cabinet Office, Central Digital & Data Office, Office for Artificial Intelligence. 2021. Guidance: Ethics, Transparency and Accountability Framework for Automated Decision-Making."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_44_1","volume-title":"Responsibility, Transparency. Medium (March","author":"Dignum Virginia","year":"2018","unstructured":"Virginia Dignum, 2023. The ART of AI - Accountability, Responsibility, Transparency. Medium (March 2018). https:\/\/medium.com\/@virginiadignum."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_45_1","volume-title":"Ethics and Law: An Introduction","author":"Wendel W. Bradley","unstructured":"W. Bradley Wendel. 2014. Ethics and Law: An Introduction (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.","edition":"1"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_46_1","volume-title":"BIPA: The Most Important Biometric Privacy Law in the US? In Amba Kak (Ed.) Regulating Biometrics: Global Approaches and Urgent Questions","author":"Hartzog Woodrow","year":"2020","unstructured":"Woodrow Hartzog, 2020. BIPA: The Most Important Biometric Privacy Law in the US? In Amba Kak (Ed.) Regulating Biometrics: Global Approaches and Urgent Questions. AI Now Institute. https:\/\/ainowinstitute.org\/publication\/regulating-biometrics-global-approaches-and-open-questions."}],"event":{"name":"ICAIL 2023: Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law","sponsor":["IAAIL Intl Asso for Artifical Intel & Law","UMinho University of Minho","SIGAI ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence","AAAI Am Assoc for Artifical Intelligence"],"location":"Braga Portugal","acronym":"ICAIL 2023"},"container-title":["Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3594536.3595156","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3594536.3595156","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,17]],"date-time":"2025-06-17T18:09:06Z","timestamp":1750183746000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3594536.3595156"}},"subtitle":["How to re-set the boundaries for the legal sector?"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,19]]},"references-count":46,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3594536.3595156","10.1145\/3594536"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3594536.3595156","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,19]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2023-09-07","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}