{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,14]],"date-time":"2026-07-14T04:16:54Z","timestamp":1784002614102,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":99,"publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)","issue":"CSCW1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,17]],"date-time":"2024-04-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1713312000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,17]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) show the potential to significantly augment or even replace complex human writing activities. However, for complex tasks where people need to make decisions as well as write a justification, the trade offs between making work efficient and hindering decisions remain unclear. In this paper, we explore this question in the context of designing intelligent scaffolding for writing meta-reviews for an academic peer review process. We prototyped a system called \"MetaWriter'' trained on five years of open peer review data to support meta-reviewing. The system highlights common topics in the original peer reviews, extracts key points by each reviewer, and on request, provides a preliminary draft of a meta-review that can be further edited. To understand how novice and experienced meta-reviewers use MetaWriter, we conducted a within-subject study with 32 participants. Each participant wrote meta-reviews for two papers: one with and one without MetaWriter. We found that MetaWriter significantly expedited the authoring process and improved the coverage of meta-reviews, as rated by experts, compared to the baseline. While participants recognized the efficiency benefits, they raised concerns around trust, over-reliance, and agency. We also interviewed six paper authors to understand their opinions of using machine intelligence to support the peer review process and reported critical reflections. We discuss implications for future interactive AI writing tools to support complex synthesis work.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1145\/3637371","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,29]],"date-time":"2024-04-29T10:05:31Z","timestamp":1714385131000},"page":"1-32","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":34,"title":["MetaWriter: Exploring the Potential and Perils of AI Writing Support in Scientific Peer Review"],"prefix":"10.1145","volume":"8","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5560-7123","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lu","family":"Sun","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0291-8600","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Stone","family":"Tao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7137-7719","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Junjie","family":"Hu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1354-9866","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Steven P.","family":"Dow","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_1_1","unstructured":"2009. Grammarly. https:\/\/grammarly.com\/."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","unstructured":"2018. Notion. https:\/\/www.notion.so\/."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","unstructured":"2020. sudowrite. https:\/\/www.sudowrite.com\/."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","unstructured":"2020. wordtune. https:\/\/www.wordtune.com."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","unstructured":"2022. ChatGPT. https:\/\/chat.openai.com\/."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3290605.3300233"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3442381.3450088"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3411764.3445717"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-45507-5_2"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dominik Beese Beg\u00fcm Altunbas G\u00f6rkem G\u00fczeler and Steffen Eger. 2022. Detecting Stance in Scientific Papers: Did we get more Negative Recently? http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2202.13610 arXiv:2202.13610 [cs].","DOI":"10.1098\/rsos.221159"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3581641.3584060"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3397271.3401190"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"John D Bransford and Daniel L Schwartz. 1999. Chapter 3: Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of research in education 24 1 (1999) 61--100.","DOI":"10.3102\/0091732X024001061"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_1","volume-title":"Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2","author":"Braun Virginia","year":"2006","unstructured":"Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3449287"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/290941.291025"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2020.emnlp-main.569"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_18_1","volume-title":"Mapping the design space of human-ai interaction in text summarization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.14863","author":"Cheng Ruijia","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ruijia Cheng, Alison Smith-Renner, Ke Zhang, Joel R Tetreault, and Alejandro Jaimes. 2022. Mapping the design space of human-ai interaction in text summarization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.14863 (2022)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Allan Collins. 2006. Cognitive apprenticeship: The cambridge handbook of the learning sciences R. Keith Sawyer.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511816833.005"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbi.2009.08.007"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_21_1","volume-title":"Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805","author":"Devlin Jacob","year":"2018","unstructured":"Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2018. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 (2018)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/23294906211031810"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3377325.3377501"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_24_1","volume-title":"Does my rebuttal matter? insights from a major nlp conference. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.11367","author":"Gao Yang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Yang Gao, Steffen Eger, Ilia Kuznetsov, Iryna Gurevych, and Yusuke Miyao. 2019. Does my rebuttal matter? insights from a major nlp conference. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.11367 (2019)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-0663.95.2.393"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3290605.3300526"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_27_1","volume-title":"Chilton","author":"Gero Katy Ilonka","year":"2021","unstructured":"Katy Ilonka Gero, Vivian Liu, and Lydia B. Chilton. 2021. Sparks: Inspiration for Science Writing using Language Models. arXiv. http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2110.07640 arXiv:2110.07640 [cs]."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_28_1","volume-title":"What Else Do I Need to Know? The Effect of Background Information on Users' Reliance on AI Systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14331","author":"Goyal Navita","year":"2023","unstructured":"Navita Goyal, Eleftheria Briakou, Amanda Liu, Connor Baumler, Claire Bonial, Jeffrey Micher, Clare R Voss, Marine Carpuat, and Hal Daum\u00e9 III. 2023. What Else Do I Need to Know? The Effect of Background Information on Users' Reliance on AI Systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14331 (2023)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/P16-1150"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2020.coling-main.285"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1807184115"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-52237-7_20"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/302979.303030"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_34_1","volume-title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.06896","author":"Hsu Chao-Chun","year":"2021","unstructured":"Chao-Chun Hsu and Chenhao Tan. 2021. Decision-Focused Summarization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.06896 (2021)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_35_1","volume-title":"Argument mining for understanding peer reviews. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.10104","author":"Hua Xinyu","year":"2019","unstructured":"Xinyu Hua, Mitko Nikolov, Nikhil Badugu, and Lu Wang. 2019. Argument mining for understanding peer reviews. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.10104 (2019)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3544548.3581029"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3173574.3173596"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jacob Jacoby and Michael S Matell. 1971. Three-point Likert scales are good enough.","DOI":"10.2307\/3150242"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3544548.3581196"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.287.21.2784"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_41_1","volume-title":"Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. Comput. Surveys","author":"Ji Ziwei","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ziwei Ji, Nayeon Lee, Rita Frieske, Tiezheng Yu, Dan Su, Yan Xu, Etsuko Ishii, Yejin Bang, Andrea Madotto, and Pascale Fung. 2022. Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. Comput. Surveys (2022)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/1978942.1979444"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_43_1","volume-title":"Sebastian Kohlmeier, Eduard Hovy, and Roy Schwartz.","author":"Kang Dongyeop","year":"2018","unstructured":"Dongyeop Kang, Waleed Ammar, Bhavana Dalvi, Madeleine Van Zuylen, Sebastian Kohlmeier, Eduard Hovy, and Roy Schwartz. 2018. A dataset of peer reviews (peerread): Collection, insights and nlp applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.09635 (2018)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_44_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3532106.3533556"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_45_1","volume-title":"Rajarshi Das, Hamed Zamani, and Andrew McCallum.","author":"Kennard Neha Nayak","year":"2021","unstructured":"Neha Nayak Kennard, Tim O'Gorman, Akshay Sharma, Chhandak Bagchi, Matthew Clinton, Pranay Kumar Yelugam, Rajarshi Das, Hamed Zamani, and Andrew McCallum. 2021. A Dataset for Discourse Structure in Peer Review Discussions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.08520 (2021)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_46_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3563657.3595996"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_47_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/JCDL52503.2021.00064"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_48_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3375627.3375833"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_49_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2732417"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_50_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3491102.3502030"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_51_1","volume-title":"Bart: Denoising sequence-to-sequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.13461","author":"Lewis Mike","year":"2019","unstructured":"Mike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad, Abdelrahman Mohamed, Omer Levy, Ves Stoyanov, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2019. Bart: Denoising sequence-to-sequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.13461 (2019)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_52_1","unstructured":"Miao Li Jianzhong Qi and Jey Han Lau. 2022. PeerSum: A Peer Review Dataset for Abstractive Multi-document Summarization. http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2203.01769 arXiv:2203.01769 [cs]."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_53_1","volume-title":"Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Text summarization branches out. 74--81.","author":"Lin Chin-Yew","year":"2004","unstructured":"Chin-Yew Lin. 2004. Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Text summarization branches out. 74--81."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_54_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3115\/1218955.1219032"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_55_1","volume-title":"Truthfulqa: Measuring how models mimic human falsehoods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.07958","author":"Lin Stephanie","year":"2021","unstructured":"Stephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, and Owain Evans. 2021. Truthfulqa: Measuring how models mimic human falsehoods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.07958 (2021)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_56_1","volume-title":"Text summarization with pretrained encoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.08345","author":"Liu Yang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Yang Liu and Mirella Lapata. 2019. Text summarization with pretrained encoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.08345 (2019)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_57_1","unstructured":"Alison McCook. 2006. Is peer review broken? Submissions are up reviewers are overtaxed and authors are lodging complaint after complaint about the process at top-tier journals. What's wrong with peer review? The scientist 20 2 (2006) 26--35."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_58_1","volume-title":"The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology","author":"McKnight Patrick E","year":"2010","unstructured":"Patrick E McKnight and Julius Najab. 2010. Mann-Whitney U Test. The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology (2010), 1--1."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_59_1","unstructured":"Piotr Mirowski Kory W. Mathewson Jaylen Pittman and Richard Evans. 2022. Co-Writing Screenplays and Theatre Scripts with Language Models: An Evaluation by Industry Professionals. arXiv. http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2209.14958 arXiv:2209.14958 [cs]."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_60_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3411763.3443441"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_61_1","volume-title":"fairseq: A fast, extensible toolkit for sequence modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.01038","author":"Ott Myle","year":"2019","unstructured":"Myle Ott, Sergey Edunov, Alexei Baevski, Angela Fan, Sam Gross, Nathan Ng, David Grangier, and Michael Auli. 2019. fairseq: A fast, extensible toolkit for sequence modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.01038 (2019)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_62_1","volume-title":"How model accuracy and explanation fidelity influence user trust. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.12652","author":"Papenmeier Andrea","year":"2019","unstructured":"Andrea Papenmeier, Gwenn Englebienne, and Christin Seifert. 2019. How model accuracy and explanation fidelity influence user trust. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.12652 (2019)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_63_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/W14-2105"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_64_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/P15-1053"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_65_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3411764.3445315"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_66_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2979672"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_67_1","volume-title":"ForSense: Accelerating Online Research Through Sensemaking Integration and Machine Research Support. In 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 608--618","author":"Rachatasumrit Napol","year":"2021","unstructured":"Napol Rachatasumrit, Gonzalo Ramos, Jina Suh, Rachel Ng, and Christopher Meek. 2021. ForSense: Accelerating Online Research Through Sensemaking Integration and Machine Research Support. In 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 608--618."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_68_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3415240"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_69_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1207\/s15327809jls1303_2"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_70_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2939672.2939778"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_71_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/17439884.2021.1936017"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_72_1","volume-title":"An overview of challenges, experiments, and computational solutions in peer review (extended version). Commun. ACM","author":"Shah Nihar B","year":"2022","unstructured":"Nihar B Shah. 2022. An overview of challenges, experiments, and computational solutions in peer review (extended version). Commun. ACM (2022)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_73_1","volume-title":"Design and analysis of the NIPS 2016 review process. Journal of machine learning research","author":"Shah Nihar B","year":"2018","unstructured":"Nihar B Shah, Behzad Tabibian, Krikamol Muandet, Isabelle Guyon, and Ulrike Von Luxburg. 2018. Design and analysis of the NIPS 2016 review process. Journal of machine learning research (2018)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_74_1","volume-title":"Mred: A meta-review dataset for structure-controllable text generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.07474","author":"Shen Chenhui","year":"2021","unstructured":"Chenhui Shen, Liying Cheng, Ran Zhou, Lidong Bing, Yang You, and Luo Si. 2021. Mred: A meta-review dataset for structure-controllable text generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.07474 (2021)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_75_1","volume-title":"Direct manipulation vs. interface agents. interactions 4, 6","author":"Shneiderman Ben","year":"1997","unstructured":"Ben Shneiderman and Pattie Maes. 1997. Direct manipulation vs. interface agents. interactions 4, 6 (1997), 42--61."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_76_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/014107680609900414"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_77_1","volume-title":"Juan Jos\u00e9 L\u00f3pez-Jim\u00e9nez, Joaqu\u00edn Nicol\u00e1s Ros, and Jos\u00e9 Luis Fern\u00e1ndez-Alem\u00e1n.","author":"Sobrino-Duque Raimel","year":"2022","unstructured":"Raimel Sobrino-Duque, Juan Manuel Carrillo-de Gea, Juan Jos\u00e9 L\u00f3pez-Jim\u00e9nez, Joaqu\u00edn Nicol\u00e1s Ros, and Jos\u00e9 Luis Fern\u00e1ndez-Alem\u00e1n. 2022. Usevalia: Managing Inspection-Based Usability Audits. International Journal of Human-- Computer Interaction (2022), 1--25."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_78_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3531146.3533177"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_79_1","unstructured":"Ivan Stelmakh Nihar B Shah and Aarti Singh. 2019. PeerReview4All: Fair and accurate reviewer assignment in peer review. In Algorithmic Learning Theory. PMLR 828--856."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_80_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3640543.3645159"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_81_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11412-006-9657-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_82_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/P17-2039"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_83_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3359313"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_84_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Qingyun Wang Qi Zeng Lifu Huang Kevin Knight Heng Ji and Nazneen Fatema Rajani. 2020. ReviewRobot: Explainable Paper Review Generation based on Knowledge Synthesis. http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2010.06119 arXiv:2010.06119 [cs].","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2020.inlg-1.44"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_85_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3377325.3377538"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_86_1","volume-title":"et al","author":"Weidinger Laura","year":"2021","unstructured":"Laura Weidinger, John Mellor, Maribeth Rauh, Conor Griffin, Jonathan Uesato, Po-Sen Huang, Myra Cheng, Mia Glaese, Borja Balle, Atoosa Kasirzadeh, et al . 2021. Ethical and social risks of harm from language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.04359 (2021)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_87_1","volume-title":"Voyager: Exploratory analysis via faceted browsing of visualization recommendations","author":"Wongsuphasawat Kanit","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kanit Wongsuphasawat, Dominik Moritz, Anushka Anand, Jock Mackinlay, Bill Howe, and Jeffrey Heer. 2015. Voyager: Exploratory analysis via faceted browsing of visualization recommendations. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 22, 1 (2015), 649--658."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_88_1","volume-title":"Text summarization as a decision support aid. BMC medical informatics and decision making 12, 1","author":"Workman T Elizabeth","year":"2012","unstructured":"T Elizabeth Workman, Marcelo Fiszman, and John F Hurdle. 2012. Text summarization as a decision support aid. BMC medical informatics and decision making 12, 1 (2012), 1--12."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_89_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3491102.3517582"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_90_1","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Association for Computational Linguistics","author":"Xiong Wenting","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wenting Xiong and Diane Litman. 2011. Automatically Predicting Peer-Review Helpfulness. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland, Oregon, USA, 502--507. https:\/\/aclanthology.org\/P11--2088"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_91_1","volume-title":"Neural extractive text summarization with syntactic compression. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.00863","author":"Xu Jiacheng","year":"2019","unstructured":"Jiacheng Xu and Greg Durrett. 2019. Neural extractive text summarization with syntactic compression. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.00863 (2019)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_92_1","volume-title":"Doc: Improving long story coherence with detailed outline control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10077","author":"Yang Kevin","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kevin Yang, Dan Klein, Nanyun Peng, and Yuandong Tian. 2022. Doc: Improving long story coherence with detailed outline control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10077 (2022)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_93_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v33i01.33017378"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_94_1","volume-title":"Wordcraft: Story Writing With Large Language Models. In 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 841--852","author":"Yuan Ann","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ann Yuan, Andy Coenen, Emily Reif, and Daphne Ippolito. 2022. Wordcraft: Story Writing With Large Language Models. In 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 841--852."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_95_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2818048.2819953"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_96_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.1.12862"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_97_1","volume-title":"Ranjodh Singh Dhaliwal, and Toby Jia-Jun Li","author":"Zhang Zheng","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zheng Zhang, Jie Gao, Ranjodh Singh Dhaliwal, and Toby Jia-Jun Li. 2023. VISAR: A Human-AI Argumentative Writing Assistant with Visual Programming and Rapid Draft Prototyping. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07810 (2023)."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_98_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3274463"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_99_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3209978.3210080"}],"container-title":["Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3637371","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3637371","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,22]],"date-time":"2025-08-22T17:30:32Z","timestamp":1755883832000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3637371"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,17]]},"references-count":99,"journal-issue":{"issue":"CSCW1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,17]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3637371"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3637371","relation":{},"ISSN":["2573-0142"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2573-0142","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,17]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-04-26","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}